A randomized controlled trial of 5% lidocaine gel for HIV-associated distal symmetric polyneuropathy

L Estanislao, K Carter, J McArthur… - JAIDS Journal of …, 2004 - journals.lww.com
L Estanislao, K Carter, J McArthur, R Olney, D Simpson
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2004journals.lww.com
Objective: To investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine gel in painful HIV-
associated distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP). Background: Painful DSP, the most
common neurologic complication in HIV infection, is difficult to treat. Lidocaine 5% gel was
effective in alleviating neuropathic pain in an open-label study of HIV DSP. Methods: In a
double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center study, 64 subjects were
randomized to receive 5% lidocaine or vehicle gel for 2 weeks (phase A). A washout period …
Abstract
Objective:
To investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine gel in painful HIV-associated distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP).
Background:
Painful DSP, the most common neurologic complication in HIV infection, is difficult to treat. Lidocaine 5% gel was effective in alleviating neuropathic pain in an open-label study of HIV DSP.
Methods:
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center study, 64 subjects were randomized to receive 5% lidocaine or vehicle gel for 2 weeks (phase A). A washout period of 2 weeks was followed by a crossover to the alternate agent for another 2 weeks (phase B). The primary outcome was difference in average pain scores (Gracely pain scale) between the 2 groups during the second week of each treatment period. Secondary outcomes included differential effect of the first treatment, difference in global pain relief, and pain response by neurotoxin exposure.
Results:
The baseline pain scores of the 2 groups were similar. The average pain scores during the second week of each phase of the lidocaine gel group did not differ from those of the placebo group (phase A: lidocaine 1.09, placebo 1.15; phase B: lidocaine 1.16, placebo 1.10). There also was no difference noted in secondary outcomes. The pain responses of lidocaine gel-treated subjects with current exposure to neurotoxic antiretrovirals (1.18) did not differ compared with those without (1.10)(P= 0.358). There were no significant adverse effects.
Conclusion:
Lidocaine 5% gel is a safe but ineffective agent in the treatment of pain in HIV-associated DSP.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins