Core and penumbral nitric oxide synthase activity during cerebral ischemia and reperfusion

S Ashwal, B Tone, HR Tian, DJ Cole, WJ Pearce - Stroke, 1998 - Am Heart Assoc
S Ashwal, B Tone, HR Tian, DJ Cole, WJ Pearce
Stroke, 1998Am Heart Assoc
Background and Purpose—The present studies examined the hypothesis that the
distribution of cerebral injury after a focal ischemic insult is associated with the regional
distribution of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity. Methods—Based on previous studies that
certain anatomically well-defined areas are prone to become either core or penumbra after
middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), we measured NOS activity in these areas from the
right and left hemispheres in a spontaneously hypertensive rat filament model. Four groups …
Background and Purpose—The present studies examined the hypothesis that the distribution of cerebral injury after a focal ischemic insult is associated with the regional distribution of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity.
Methods—Based on previous studies that certain anatomically well-defined areas are prone to become either core or penumbra after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), we measured NOS activity in these areas from the right and left hemispheres in a spontaneously hypertensive rat filament model. Four groups were studied: (1) controls (immediate decapitation); (2) 1.5 hours of MCAO with no reperfusion (R0); (3) 1.5 hours of MCAO with 0.5 hour of reperfusion (R0.5); and (4) 1.5 hours of MCAO with 24 hours of reperfusion (R24). Three groups of corresponding isoflurane sham controls were also included: 1.5 (S1.5) or 2 (S2.0) hours of anesthesia and 1.5 hours of anesthesia+24 hours of observation (S24).
Results—Control core NOS activity for combined right and left hemispheres was 129% greater than penumbral NOS activity (P<0.05). Combined core NOS activity was also greater (P<0.05) in the three sham groups: 208%, 122%, and 161%, respectively. In the three MCAO groups, ischemic and nonischemic core NOS remained higher than penumbral regions (P<0.05). However, NOS activity was lower in the ischemic than in the nonischemic core in all three groups: R0 (29% lower), R0.5 (48%), and R24 (86%) (P<0.05). Addition of cofactors (10 μmol/L tetrahydrobiopterin, 3 μmol/L flavin adenine dinucleotide, and 3 μmol/L flavin mononucleotide) increased NOS activity in all groups and lessened the decrease in ischemic core and penumbral NOS.
Conclusions—Greater NOS activity in core regions could explain in part the increased vulnerability of that region to ischemia and could theoretically contribute to the progression of the infarct over time. The data also suggest that NOS activity during ischemia and reperfusion could be influenced by the availability of cofactors.
Am Heart Assoc