Phase I trial of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in patients with advanced cancer

DB Solit, SP Ivy, C Kopil, R Sikorski, MJ Morris… - Clinical Cancer …, 2007 - AACR
DB Solit, SP Ivy, C Kopil, R Sikorski, MJ Morris, SF Slovin, WK Kelly, A DeLaCruz, T Curley…
Clinical Cancer Research, 2007AACR
Purpose: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of
17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered using continuous
and intermittent dosing schedules. Experimental Design: Patients with progressive solid
tumor malignancies were treated with 17-AAG using an accelerated titration dose escalation
schema. The starting dose and schedule were 5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days with cycles repeated
every 21 days. Dosing modifications based on safety, pharmacodynamic modeling, and …
Abstract
Purpose: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered using continuous and intermittent dosing schedules.
Experimental Design: Patients with progressive solid tumor malignancies were treated with 17-AAG using an accelerated titration dose escalation schema. The starting dose and schedule were 5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days with cycles repeated every 21 days. Dosing modifications based on safety, pharmacodynamic modeling, and clinical outcomes led to the evaluation of the following schedules: daily × 3 repeated every 14 days; twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, and 11) for 2 weeks every 3 weeks; and twice weekly (days 1 and 4) without interruption. During cycle 1, blood was collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies.
Results: Fifty-four eligible patients were treated. The MTD was schedule dependent: 56 mg/m2 on the daily × 5 schedule; 112 mg/m2 on the daily × 3 schedule; and 220 mg/m2 on the days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every-21-day schedule. Continuous twice-weekly dosing was deemed too toxic because of delayed hepatotoxicity. Hepatic toxicity was also dose limiting with the daily × 5 schedule. Other common toxicities encountered were fatigue, myalgias, and nausea. This latter adverse effect may have been attributable, in part, to the DMSO-based formulation. Concentrations of 17-AAG above those required for activity in preclinical models could be safely achieved in plasma. Induction of a heat shock response and down-regulation of Akt and Raf-1 were observed in biomarker studies.
Conclusion: The MTD and toxicity profile of 17-AAG were schedule dependent. Intermittent dosing schedules were less toxic and are recommended for future phase II studies.
AACR