[HTML][HTML] Differential gene expression profiles are dependent upon method of peripheral blood collection and RNA isolation

AL Asare, SA Kolchinsky, Z Gao, R Wang, K Raddassi… - BMC genomics, 2008 - Springer
AL Asare, SA Kolchinsky, Z Gao, R Wang, K Raddassi, K Bourcier, V Seyfert-Margolis
BMC genomics, 2008Springer
Background RNA isolation and purification steps greatly influence the results of gene
expression profiling. There are two commercially available products for whole blood RNA
collection, PAXgene™ and Tempus™ blood collection tubes, and each comes with their
own RNA purification method. In both systems the blood is immediately lysed when
collected into the tube and RNA stabilized using proprietary reagents. Both systems enable
minimal blood handling procedures thus minimizing the risk of inducing changes in gene …
Background
RNA isolation and purification steps greatly influence the results of gene expression profiling. There are two commercially available products for whole blood RNA collection, PAXgene™ and Tempus™ blood collection tubes, and each comes with their own RNA purification method. In both systems the blood is immediately lysed when collected into the tube and RNA stabilized using proprietary reagents. Both systems enable minimal blood handling procedures thus minimizing the risk of inducing changes in gene expression through blood handling or processing. Because the RNA purification steps could influence the total RNA pool, we examined the impact of RNA isolation, using the PAXgene™ or Tempus™ method, on gene expression profiles.
Results
Using microarrays as readout of RNA from stimulated whole blood we found a common set of expressed transcripts in RNA samples from either PAXgene™ or Tempus™. However, we also found several to be uniquely expressed depending on the type of collection tube, suggesting that RNA purification methods impact results of differential gene expression profiling. Specifically, transcripts for several known PHA-inducible genes, including IFNγ, IL13, IL2, IL3, and IL4 were found to be upregulated in stimulated vs. control samples when RNA was isolated using the ABI Tempus™ method, but not using the PAXgene™ method (p < 0.01, FDR corrected). Sequenom Quantiative Gene Expression (QGE) (SanDiego, CA) measures confirmed IL2, IL4 and IFNγ up-regulation in Tempus™ purified RNA from PHA stimulated cells while only IL2 was up-regulated using PAXgene™ purified (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Here, we demonstrate that peripheral blood RNA isolation methods can critically impact differential expression results, particularly in the clinical setting where fold-change differences are typically small and there is inherent variability within biological cohorts. A modified method based upon the Tempus™ system was found to provide high yield, good post-hybridization array quality, low variability in expression measures and was shown to produce differential expression results consistent with the predicted immunologic effects of PHA stimulation.
Springer