X-linked inhibitor regulating TRAIL-induced apoptosis in chemoresistant human primary glioblastoma cells

WH Roa, H Chen, D Fulton… - Clinical and …, 2003 - search.proquest.com
WH Roa, H Chen, D Fulton, S Gulavita
Clinical and investigative medicine, 2003search.proquest.com
TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity in 2 human primary glioblastoma cell lines by XTT assay
demonstrated that ED 326. BT was moderately sensitive in a dose-dependent fashion,
whereas ED 273b. BT was resistant (< 20% response)(Fig. 1A). The results were confirmed
by Hoechst staining for apoptotic nuclear morphology. Furthermore, these 2 cell lines were
incubated with cisplatin or VP 16 for 24 hours at concentrations ranging from 20.00 to 0.33
[mu] g/mL. The chemotherapeutic drugs alone induced only a limited cell kill of these 2 cell …
Abstract
TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity in 2 human primary glioblastoma cell lines by XTT assay demonstrated that ED 326. BT was moderately sensitive in a dose-dependent fashion, whereas ED 273b. BT was resistant (< 20% response)(Fig. 1A). The results were confirmed by Hoechst staining for apoptotic nuclear morphology. Furthermore, these 2 cell lines were incubated with cisplatin or VP 16 for 24 hours at concentrations ranging from 20.00 to 0.33 [mu] g/mL. The chemotherapeutic drugs alone induced only a limited cell kill of these 2 cell lines (Fig. 1, B and C). This finding was similar to the 25% and 0% apoptotic cell kill identified with 100 ng/mL of TRAIL alone in ED 326. BT and ED 273b. BT respectively. When cisplatin or VP 16 was applied in combination with a fixed concentration of TRAIL (100 ng/mL) to ED 326. BT and ED 273b. BT cell lines, different results were obtained (Fig. 1, B and C). Here, ED 326. BT with low expression of Bcl-x^ sub L^ showed a synergistic response to TRAIL and cisplatin or VP 16, whereas ED 273b. BT with high level of Bcl-x^ sub L^ did not. Moreover, XIAP was expressed to a similar degree in both cell lines irrespective of their sensitivity to TRAIL (Fig. 1D).
ProQuest