Phase III study of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor prinomastat in non–small-cell lung cancer

D Bissett, KJ O'Byrne, J Von Pawel… - Journal of Clinical …, 2005 - ascopubs.org
D Bissett, KJ O'Byrne, J Von Pawel, U Gatzemeier, A Price, M Nicolson, R Mercier…
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005ascopubs.org
Purpose Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade extracellular proteins and facilitate
tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This trial was undertaken to
determine the effect of prinomastat, an inhibitor of selected MMPs, on the survival of patients
with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), when given in combination with
gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients
were randomly assigned to receive prinomastat 15 mg or placebo twice daily orally …
Purpose
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade extracellular proteins and facilitate tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This trial was undertaken to determine the effect of prinomastat, an inhibitor of selected MMPs, on the survival of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), when given in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy.
Patients and Methods
Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomly assigned to receive prinomastat 15 mg or placebo twice daily orally continuously, in combination with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, every 21 days for up to six cycles. The planned sample size was 420 patients.
Results
Study results at an interim analysis and lack of efficacy in another phase III trial prompted early closure of this study. There were 362 patients randomized (181 on prinomastat and 181 on placebo). One hundred thirty-four patients had stage IIIB disease with T4 primary tumor, 193 had stage IV disease, and 34 had recurrent disease (one enrolled patient was ineligible with stage IIIA disease). Overall response rates for the two treatment arms were similar (27% for prinomastat v 26% for placebo; P = .81). There was no difference in overall survival or time to progression; for prinomastat versus placebo patients, the median overall survival times were 11.5 versus 10.8 months (P = .82), 1-year survival rates were 43% v 38% (P = .45), and progression-free survival times were 6.1 v 5.5 months (P = .11), respectively. The toxicities of prinomastat were arthralgia, stiffness, and joint swelling. Treatment interruption was required in 38% of prinomastat patients and 12% of placebo patients.
Conclusion
Prinomastat does not improve the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC.
ASCO Publications