Abnormal Myocardial Contraction in α1A–and α1B–adrenoceptor double-knockout mice

DT McCloskey, L Turnbull, P Swigart… - Journal of molecular and …, 2003 - Elsevier
DT McCloskey, L Turnbull, P Swigart, TD O'Connell, PC Simpson, AJ Baker
Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2003Elsevier
We used double-knockout mice (ABKO) lacking both predominant myocardial α1–
adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes (α1A and α1B) to determine if α1–ARs are required for
normal myocardial contraction. Langendorff-perfused ABKO hearts had higher developed
pressure than wild type (WT) hearts (123±3 mmHg n= 22 vs. 103±3 mmHg, n= 38, P<
0.001). Acutely inhibiting α1–ARs in WT hearts with prazosin did not increase pressure,
suggesting that the increased pressure of ABKO hearts was mediated by long-term trophic …
We used double-knockout mice (ABKO) lacking both predominant myocardial α1–adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes (α1A and α1B) to determine if α1–ARs are required for normal myocardial contraction. Langendorff-perfused ABKO hearts had higher developed pressure than wild type (WT) hearts (123 ± 3 mmHg n = 22 vs. 103 ± 3 mmHg, n = 38, P < 0.001). Acutely inhibiting α1–ARs in WT hearts with prazosin did not increase pressure, suggesting that the increased pressure of ABKO hearts was mediated by long-term trophic effects on contraction rather than direct regulatory effects of α1–AR removal. Similar to perfused hearts, ABKO ventricular trabeculae had higher submaximal force at 2 mM extracellular [Ca2+] than WT (11.4 ± 1.7 vs. 6.9 ± 0.6 mN/mm2, n = 8, P < 0.05); however, the peaks of fura-2 Ca2+ transients were not different (0.79 ± 0.11 vs. 0.75 ± 0.16 μM, n = 10–12, P > 0.05), suggesting ABKO myocardium had increased myofilament Ca2+–sensitivity. This conclusion was supported by measuring the Ca2+–force relationship using tetanization. Increased myofilament Ca2+–sensitivity was not explained by intracellular pH, which did not differ between ABKO and WT (7.41 ± 0.01 vs. 7.39 ± 0.02, n = 4–6, P > 0.05; from BCECF fluorescence). However, ABKO displayed impaired troponin I phosphorylation, which may have played a role. In contrast to increased submaximal force, ABKO trabeculae had lower maximal force than WT at high extracellular [Ca2+] (29.6 ± 1.9 vs. 37.6 ± 1.4 mN/mm2, n = 7, P < 0.01). However, peak cytosolic [Ca2+] was not different (1.13 ± 0.15 vs. 1.19 ± 0.04 μM, n = 6–7, P > 0.05), suggesting ABKO myocardium had impaired myofilament function. Finally, ABKO myocardium had decreased responsiveness to β-AR stimulation. We conclude: α1–ARs are required for normal myocardial contraction; α1–ARs mediate long-term trophic effects on contraction; loss of α1–AR function causes some of the functional abnormalities that are also found in heart failure.
Elsevier