Platelet-derived growth factor-BB and Ets-1 transcription factor negatively regulate transcription of multiple smooth muscle cell differentiation marker genes

F Dandré, GK Owens - American Journal of Physiology …, 2004 - journals.physiology.org
F Dandré, GK Owens
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2004journals.physiology.org
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, a potent mitogen for mesenchymal cells, also
downregulates expression of multiple smooth muscle (SM) cell (SMC)-specific markers.
However, there is conflicting evidence whether PDGF-BB represses SMC marker expression
at a transcriptional or posttranscriptional level, and little is known regarding the mechanisms
responsible for these effects. Results of the present studies provide clear evidence that
PDGF-BB treatment strongly repressed SM α-actin, SM myosin heavy chain (MHC), and …
Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, a potent mitogen for mesenchymal cells, also downregulates expression of multiple smooth muscle (SM) cell (SMC)-specific markers. However, there is conflicting evidence whether PDGF-BB represses SMC marker expression at a transcriptional or posttranscriptional level, and little is known regarding the mechanisms responsible for these effects. Results of the present studies provide clear evidence that PDGF-BB treatment strongly repressed SM α-actin, SM myosin heavy chain (MHC), and SM22α promoters in SMCs. Of major significance for resolving previous controversies in the field, we found PDGF-BB-induced repression of SMC marker gene promoters in subconfluent, but not postconfluent, cultures. Treatment of postconfluent SMCs with a tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor restored PDGF-BB-induced repression, whereas treatment of subconfluent SMCs with a tyrosine kinase blocker abolished PDGF-BB-induced repression, suggesting that a tyrosine phosphorylation event mediates cell density-dependent effects. On the basis of previous observations that Ets-1 transcription factor is upregulated within phenotypically modulated neointimal SMCs, we tested whether Ets-1 would repress SMC marker expression. Consistent with this hypothesis, results of cotransfection experiments indicated that Ets-1 overexpression reduced transcriptional activity of SMC marker promoter constructs in SMCs, whereas it increased activity of SM α-actin promoter in endothelial cells. PDGF-BB treatment increased expression of Ets-1 in cultured SMCs, and SM α-actin mRNA expression was reduced in multiple independent clones of SMCs stably transfected with an Ets-1-overexpressing construct. Taken together, results of these experiments provide novel insights regarding possible mechanisms whereby PDGF-BB and Ets-1 may contribute to SMC phenotypic switching associated with vascular injury.
American Physiological Society