[HTML][HTML] Selectivity of repaglinide and glibenclamide for the pancreatic over the cardiovascular KATP channels

D Stephan, M Winkler, P Kühner, U Russ, U Quast - Diabetologia, 2006 - Springer
D Stephan, M Winkler, P Kühner, U Russ, U Quast
Diabetologia, 2006Springer
Aims/hypothesis Sulfonylureas and glinides close beta cell ATP-sensitive K+(K ATP)
channels to increase insulin release; the concomitant closure of cardiovascular K ATP
channels, however, leads to complications in patients with cardiac ischaemia. The
insulinotrope repaglinide is successful in therapy, but has been reported to inhibit the
recombinant K ATP channels of beta cells, cardiocytes and non-vascular smooth muscle
cells with similar potencies, suggesting that the (patho-) physiological role of the …
Aims/hypothesis
Sulfonylureas and glinides close beta cell ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channels to increase insulin release; the concomitant closure of cardiovascular KATP channels, however, leads to complications in patients with cardiac ischaemia. The insulinotrope repaglinide is successful in therapy, but has been reported to inhibit the recombinant KATP channels of beta cells, cardiocytes and non-vascular smooth muscle cells with similar potencies, suggesting that the (patho-)physiological role of the cardiovascular KATP channels may be overstated. We therefore re-examined repaglinide’s potency at and affinity for the recombinant pancreatic, myocardial and vascular KATP channels in comparison with glibenclamide.
Methods
KATP channel subunits (i.e. inwardly rectifying K+ channels [Kir6.x] and sulfonylurea receptors [SURx]) were expressed in intact human embryonic kidney cells and assayed in whole-cell patch-clamp and [3H]glibenclamide binding experiments at 37°C.
Results
Repaglinide and glibenclamide, respectively, were ≥30 and ≥1,000 times more potent in closing the pancreatic than the cardiovascular channels and they did not lead to complete inhibition of the myocardial channel. Binding assays showed that the selectivity of glibenclamide was essentially based on high affinity for the pancreatic SUR, whereas binding of repaglinide to the SUR subtypes was rather non-selective. After coexpression with Kir6.x to form the assembled channels, however, the affinity of the pancreatic channel for repaglinide was increased 130-fold, an effect much larger than with the cardiovascular channels. This selective effect of coexpression depended on the piperidino substituent in repaglinide.
Conclusions/interpretation
Repaglinide and glibenclamide show higher potency and efficacy in inhibiting the pancreatic than the cardiovascular KATP channels, thus supporting their clinical use.
Springer