Adipose tissue volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in rats

R Ross, L Leger, R Guardo… - Journal of Applied …, 1991 - journals.physiology.org
Journal of Applied Physiology, 1991journals.physiology.org
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the viability of magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) as a means of measuring the body composition of rodents. To do so we
compared adipose tissue (AT) volumes measured by MRI with those obtained by X-ray
computerized tomography (CT) in a group of rats (n= 17) varying in weight (465-815 g) and
percent body fat (5.4-31.1%), with the latter determined by chemical analysis. For both MRI
and CT, AT volumes (cm3) per transverse slice (3-mm thickness, 21-mm centers) were …
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the viability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a means of measuring the body composition of rodents. To do so we compared adipose tissue (AT) volumes measured by MRI with those obtained by X-ray computerized tomography (CT) in a group of rats (n = 17) varying in weight (465-815 g) and percent body fat (5.4-31.1%), with the latter determined by chemical analysis. For both MRI and CT, AT volumes (cm3) per transverse slice (3-mm thickness, 21-mm centers) were determined using a computer-based image analysis system that permitted detailed comparisons of both visceral and subcutaneous AT depots. Total AT volumes were calculated using a linear interpolation of AT areas obtained on consecutive slices. Correlation coefficients between MRI and CT for visceral [r = 0.98, standard error of estimate (SEE) = 6.8 cm3], subcutaneous (r = 0.98, SEE = 6.5 cm3), and total AT volumes (r = 0.99, SEE = 9.0 cm3) were highly significant (P less than 0.001). Both MRI- and CT-predicted AT mass (assuming fat density = 0.90 g/ml) correlated strongly with chemically extracted lipid (grams) values (r = 0.98, SEE 9.6 g and r = 0.99, SEE = 6.9 g, respectively). Post hoc Scheffe contrasts demonstrated that the mean AT and lipid mass values derived by the three methods were not significantly different (P = 0.01). No systematic differences were observed because the regression lines derived for either MRI or CT vs. chemical analysis were not significantly different from the identity line.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
American Physiological Society