Smads and early developmental signaling by the TGFβ superfamily

M Whitman - Genes & development, 1998 - genesdev.cshlp.org
Genes & development, 1998genesdev.cshlp.org
Members of the transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) superfamily of peptide growth factors
regulate a broad range of cellular functions, including proliferation, apoptosis, extracellular
matrix secretion and adhesion, terminal differentiation, and specification of developmental
fate (Roberts and Sporn 1993; Wall and Hogan 1994; Moses and Serra 1996). Although
regulation of each of these functions by TGFß superfamily factors is important throughout
embryonic development, it is the potency of these factors in regulating developmental fate …
Members of the transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) superfamily of peptide growth factors regulate a broad range of cellular functions, including proliferation, apoptosis, extracellular matrix secretion and adhesion, terminal differentiation, and specification of developmental fate (Roberts and Sporn 1993; Wall and Hogan 1994; Moses and Serra 1996). Although regulation of each of these functions by TGFß superfamily factors is important throughout embryonic development, it is the potency of these factors in regulating developmental fate that has been the focus of recent excitement among embryologists. This has been primarily because of indications in both vertebrate and invertebrate model systems that TGFßs can serve as morphogens, acting across developing tissues in a graded fashion to specify a patterned array of cell fates (Gurdon et al. 1994; Nellen et al. 1996; Neumann and Cohen 1997). A defining feature of morphogens is their ability to specify multiple cell types over a range of concentrations. This capacity has been demonstrated for several members of the TGFß superfamily in early Xenopus embryos (Green and Smith 1990; Dosch et al. 1997; Wilson et al. 1997) and for the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) homolog decapentaplegic (dpp) in the early Drosophila embryo and wing disc (Gelbart 1989; Ferguson and Anderson 1992; Wharton et al. 1993; Lecuit et al. 1996; Nellen et al. 1996). The intracellular mechanisms by which ligand dose can be transduced into multiple developmental fates is therefore a current focus of interest for understanding TGFßs as morphogens.
A second striking feature of TGFß superfamily signals is the variety of effects they can evoke, contingent on the developmental history of the responding cell. For example, at the gastrula stage, BMP2 can specify frog blastomeres as epidermal rather than neural progenitors (Wilson et al. 1997); at later stages it can specify dorsoventral pattern in the neural tube (for review, see Tanabe and Jessell 1997), neural crest (NC) cells to form neuronal rather than Schwann cells (for review, see Mehler et al. 1997), and apoptotic patterning of the NC during rhombomere segmentation (Graham and Lumsden 1996). How the developmental history of a particular cell intersects with an instructive signal from a TGFß super-
genesdev.cshlp.org