Role of endogenous tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 1 for experimental tumor growth and the development of cancer cachexia

J Gelin, LL Moldawer, C Lönnroth, B Sherry… - Cancer research, 1991 - AACR
J Gelin, LL Moldawer, C Lönnroth, B Sherry, R Chizzonite, K Lundholm
Cancer research, 1991AACR
The aim of this study was to evaluate to what extent tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and
interleukin 1 may explain the development of experimental cancer cachexia. For this
purpose, C57BL/6J mice bearing a transplantable low differentiated rapidly growing tumor
were passively immunized every other day with rabbit or rat neutralizing immunoglobulins
against either TNF-α (anti-TNF) or against an interleukin 1 receptor (anti-IL-lr). Anti-IL-1r in
itself had no agonistic effect to the type I, T-cell/fibroblast IL-receptor. Tumor-bearing mice …
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate to what extent tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 1 may explain the development of experimental cancer cachexia. For this purpose, C57BL/6J mice bearing a transplantable low differentiated rapidly growing tumor were passively immunized every other day with rabbit or rat neutralizing immunoglobulins against either TNF-α (anti-TNF) or against an interleukin 1 receptor (anti-IL-lr). Anti-IL-1r in itself had no agonistic effect to the type I, T-cell/fibroblast IL-receptor. Tumor-bearing mice receiving either preimmune antiserum or nonimmune rat hybridoma IgG served as controls.
Anti-TNF and anti-IL-1r inhibited tumor growth significantly, as measured by a lower wet and dry tumor weight at the end of 11 days of antiserum treatment (P < 0.05). The acute phase response in tumor-bearing animals, measured as an increase in liver weight, hepatic RNA content, and increases in plasma concentrations of circulating IL-6, serum amyloid P, transferrin, complement (C3), and a decrease in plasma albumin, were unaffected by the specific antiserum treatments. Food intake, which declined significantly in pre/nonimmune injected tumor-bearing controls, was significantly improved in tumor-bearing animals immunized against TNF-α or the IL-1r. Whole body lipid content showed a trend to improvement in specifically immunized animals (P < 0.07). The effects on whole body fat-free dry weight were insignificant, although numerically higher in specifically immunized tumor-bearing animals. The combination of anti-TNF and anti-IL-1r antiserum had no additive effects compared to single antiserum treatment suggesting that the two antibody treatments acted through a common mechanism. Cultured tumor cells, established from growing tumors, were sensitive to anti-TNF and anti-IL-1r, which both reduced tumor growth in vitro. This inhibitory effect by the antiserum could in part be reversed by the addition of recombinant IL-1α and TNFα.
We conclude that both TNF and IL-1 are involved in tumor growth and thus the progression of cancer cachexia. It seems as if the role of TNF and IL-1 was to promote tumor growth rather than restrict tumor growth in the present model. In this sense both TNF and IL-1 may act as tumor growth factors.
AACR