Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk

EL Goode, CM Ulrich, JD Potter - Cancer epidemiology biomarkers & …, 2002 - AACR
EL Goode, CM Ulrich, JD Potter
Cancer epidemiology biomarkers & prevention, 2002AACR
Common polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may alter protein function and an individual's
capacity to repair damaged DNA; deficits in repair capacity may lead to genetic instability
and carcinogenesis. To establish our overall understanding of possible in vivo relationships
between DNA repair polymorphisms and the development of cancer, we performed a
literature review of epidemiological studies that assessed associations between such
polymorphisms and risk of cancer. Thirty studies of polymorphisms in OGG1, XRCC1 …
Abstract
Common polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may alter protein function and an individual’s capacity to repair damaged DNA; deficits in repair capacity may lead to genetic instability and carcinogenesis. To establish our overall understanding of possible in vivo relationships between DNA repair polymorphisms and the development of cancer, we performed a literature review of epidemiological studies that assessed associations between such polymorphisms and risk of cancer. Thirty studies of polymorphisms in OGG1, XRCC1, ERCC1, XPC, XPD, XPF, BRCA2, and XRCC3 were identified in the April 30, 2002 MEDLINE database (National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubMed Database: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez). These studies focused on adult glioma, bladder cancer, breast cancer, esophageal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, skin cancer (melanoma and nonmelanoma), squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and stomach cancer. We found that a small proportion of the published studies were large and population-based. Nonetheless, published data were consistent with associations between: (a) the OGG1 S326C variant and increased risk of various types of cancer; (b) the XRCC1 R194W variant and reduced risk of various types of cancer; and (c) the BRCA2 N372H variant and increased risk of breast cancer. Suggestive results were seen for polymorphisms in other genes; however, small sample sizes may have contributed to false-positive or false-negative findings. We conclude that large, well-designed studies of common polymorphisms in DNA repair genes are needed. Such studies may benefit from analysis of multiple genes or polymorphisms and from the consideration of relevant exposures that may influence the likelihood of cancer in the presence of reduced DNA repair capacity.
AACR