Deletion of estrogen receptors reveals a regulatory role for estrogen receptors-β in bone remodeling in females but not in males

NA Sims, S Dupont, A Krust, P Clement-Lacroix… - Bone, 2002 - Elsevier
NA Sims, S Dupont, A Krust, P Clement-Lacroix, D Minet, M Resche-Rigon, M Gaillard-Kelly…
Bone, 2002Elsevier
To determine the contributions of estrogen receptor (ER) α and ERβ in bone growth and
remodeling in male and female mice, we generated and analyzed full knockouts for each
receptor, and a double ER knockout. Although suppression of the ligand to the ERs (ie,
estradiol) after menopause or gonadectomy in females led to a catastrophic increase in
bone turnover and concomitant bone loss, deletion of one or both ERs failed to show such
an effect. Complete deletion of ERα led to a decrease, not an increase, in bone turnover and …
To determine the contributions of estrogen receptor (ER)α and ERβ in bone growth and remodeling in male and female mice, we generated and analyzed full knockouts for each receptor, and a double ER knockout. Although suppression of the ligand to the ERs (i.e., estradiol) after menopause or gonadectomy in females led to a catastrophic increase in bone turnover and concomitant bone loss, deletion of one or both ERs failed to show such an effect. Complete deletion of ERα led to a decrease, not an increase, in bone turnover and an increase, not a decrease, in trabecular bone volume in both male and female animals. Deletion of ERβ led to different responses in males, where bone was unaffected, and in females, where bone resorption was decreased and trabecular bone volume increased. In contrast, deletion of both ERs led to a profound decrease in trabecular bone volume in females, which was associated with a decrease, not an increase, in bone turnover. Finally, deletion of ERα, but not ERβ, led to major changes in circulating levels of estradiol and/or testosterone, indirectly affecting bone remodeling and bone mass. Thus, only ERα was shown to regulate bone remodeling in males, whereas in females both receptor subtypes influenced this process and could, at least under basal knockout conditions, compensate for each other.
Elsevier