Clinical considerations in selecting antiplatelet therapy in cerebrovascular disease

JW Harbison - American journal of health-system pharmacy, 1998 - academic.oup.com
JW Harbison
American journal of health-system pharmacy, 1998academic.oup.com
Effective antiplatelet drugs—aspirin, ticlopidine, dipyridamole, and clopidogrel—are
reviewed. Aspirin has remained the pharmacologic foundation of stroke prevention, primarily
because of its low cost. It has been shown to provide a 22% relative risk reduction of stroke
in high-risk patients. Its principal adverse effect is gastrotoxicity. Ticlopidine has been widely
used in patients with a high risk of stroke who are sensitive to aspirin or in whom aspirin has
failed. It has been associated with a median reduction in adenosine diphosphate-induced …
Abstract
Effective antiplatelet drugs—aspirin, ticlopidine, dipyridamole, and clopidogrel—are reviewed.
Aspirin has remained the pharmacologic foundation of stroke prevention, primarily because of its low cost. It has been shown to provide a 22% relative risk reduction of stroke in high-risk patients. Its principal adverse effect is gastrotoxicity. Ticlopidine has been widely used in patients with a high risk of stroke who are sensitive to aspirin or in whom aspirin has failed. It has been associated with a median reduction in adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation of 70% in about 8-11 days. Ticlopidine has been shown to be superior to aspirin at three years in preventing stroke. The principal adverse effects are diarrhea and rash; there has been a 2.4% occurrence of neutropenia. In a trial comparing aspirin, dipyridamole, and a combination of the two, the risk of stroke was 18% lower with aspirin, 16% lower with dipyridamole, and 37% lower with combination therapy compared with placebo. The adverse-effect profile of dipyridamole has proven to be less problematic than that of aspirin or ticlopidine. In a trial comparing clopidogrel with aspirin, patients receiving clopidogrel had an annual 5.32% risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death compared with 5.83% for patients receiving aspirin. Clopidogrel has been associated with a small occurrence of rash and diarrhea, and gastrointestinal intolerance and hemorrhage were less frequent with clopidogrel than with aspirin. Both aspirin and clopidogrel are associated with a low occurrence of neutropenia.
Aspirin, ticlopidine, dipyridamole, and clopidogrel have earned a role in stroke prevention; the different adverse-effect profiles of the drugs will influence the choice of agent.
Oxford University Press