Bone marrow micronucleus assay: a review of the mouse stocks used and their published mean spontaneous micronucleus frequencies

MF Salamone, KH Mavournin - Environmental and Molecular …, 1994 - Wiley Online Library
MF Salamone, KH Mavournin
Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 1994Wiley Online Library
We have examined published negative control data from 581 papers on micronucleated
bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes (mnPCE) for differences in mean frequency and
the frequency distribution profile among the mouse stocks used with the bone marrow
micronucleus assay. For the 55 mouse stocks with published micronucleus assay data, the
overall mean frequency is 1.95 mnPCE/1,000 PCE (1.95 mnPCE/1,000); for the 13 stocks
most commonly used in the assay, it is 1.88 mnPCE/1,000. During the last 5 years, the …
Abstract
We have examined published negative control data from 581 papers on micronucleated bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes (mnPCE) for differences in mean frequency and the frequency distribution profile among the mouse stocks used with the bone marrow micronucleus assay. For the 55 mouse stocks with published micronucleus assay data, the overall mean frequency is 1.95 mnPCE/1,000 PCE (1.95 mnPCE/1,000); for the 13 stocks most commonly used in the assay, it is 1.88 mnPCE/1,000. During the last 5 years, the mnPCE rate for these 13 major stocks has been 1.74 mnPCE/1,000. This current mean frequency is a substantial decrease from the mean of 3.07 mnPCE/1,000 observed for these 13 stocks for data published prior to 1981. Of the major stocks, the highest mean mnPCE negative control frequencies were observed for MS/Ae > BALB/c > C57B1/6,and the lowest for CD‐1 < Swiss Webster. We note that hybrid mouse stocks appear to have lower and less variable negative control frequencies than either of their parent strains and that the negative control frequency for some progeny stocks have diverged significantly from that of the parent stocks. Overall mean negative control frequencies appear to be correlated with breadth of the frequency distribution profile of published mean negative control values. Furthermore, a possible correlation between negative control frequency in the micronucleus assay and sensitivity to clastogens of different mouse strains may be indicated. The databases generated here allow us to define a range of norms for both the historical mean frequency and individual experimental mean frequencies for most stocks, but in particular, for the more commonly used mouse stocks. Our analysis, for the most part, bears out the recommendation of the first Gene‐Tox Report on the micronucleus assay that the historical negative control frequency for a mouse stock should fall between 1 and 3 mnPCE/1,000. Eighty‐six percent of the most commonly used mouse stocks have historical mean frequencies within this range. Though individual experimental mean values would not necessarily be expected to fall within the 1–3.00 mnPCE/1,000 range, 65.3% of the 2,327 published negative control values do, and 83.5% are <3 mnPCE/1,000. The frequency with which an individual experimental mean value lies outside the 1.00 to 3.00 mnPCE/1,000 range differs among stocks and appears related to the mouse mean frequency. We suggest that the recommended range for historical mean frequency be extended slightly, to approximately 3.4 mnPCE/ 1,000, to accommodate some commonly used strains with overall mean negative control frequencies just above 3.00 mnPCE/1,000. In addition, we recommend that individual experimental mean control values outside the normal range for a given mouse stock be confirmed. The values which define normality will differ with each stock. In general, however, the database generated here indicates that experimental mean control values above 4 mnPCE/1,000 are unusual for at least half of the major mouse stocks. Furthermore, experimental negative control results ≧5 mnPCE/1,000 should be questioned and in most cases confirmed, while those negative control values ≧6.00 mnPCE/1,000 should routinely be verified by repetition regardless of the mouse used, as these are rare events. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Wiley Online Library