Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • 100th Anniversary of Insulin's Discovery (Jan 2021)
    • Hypoxia-inducible factors in disease pathophysiology and therapeutics (Oct 2020)
    • Latency in Infectious Disease (Jul 2020)
    • Immunotherapy in Hematological Cancers (Apr 2020)
    • Big Data's Future in Medicine (Feb 2020)
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Targeting methyltransferase PRMT5 eliminates leukemia stem cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia
Yanli Jin, … , Ruibao Ren, Jingxuan Pan
Yanli Jin, … , Ruibao Ren, Jingxuan Pan
Published September 19, 2016
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2016;126(10):3961-3980. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI85239.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hematology

Targeting methyltransferase PRMT5 eliminates leukemia stem cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Imatinib-insensitive leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are believed to be responsible for resistance to BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors and relapse of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Identifying therapeutic targets to eradicate CML LSCs may be a strategy to cure CML. In the present study, we discovered a positive feedback loop between BCR-ABL and protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) in CML cells. Overexpression of PRMT5 was observed in human CML LSCs. Silencing PRMT5 with shRNA or blocking PRMT5 methyltransferase activity with the small-molecule inhibitor PJ-68 reduced survival, serial replating capacity, and long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-ICs) in LSCs from CML patients. Further, PRMT5 knockdown or PJ-68 treatment dramatically prolonged survival in a murine model of retroviral BCR-ABL–driven CML and impaired the in vivo self-renewal capacity of transplanted CML LSCs. PJ-68 also inhibited long-term engraftment of human CML CD34+ cells in immunodeficient mice. Moreover, inhibition of PRMT5 abrogated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in CML CD34+ cells by depleting dishevelled homolog 3 (DVL3). This study suggests that epigenetic methylation modification on histone protein arginine residues is a regulatory mechanism to control self-renewal of LSCs and indicates that PRMT5 may represent a potential therapeutic target against LSCs.

Authors

Yanli Jin, Jingfeng Zhou, Fang Xu, Bei Jin, Lijing Cui, Yun Wang, Xin Du, Juan Li, Peng Li, Ruibao Ren, Jingxuan Pan

×

Figure 7

Pharmacological inhibition of PRMT5 activity decreases the frequency of in vivo CML LSCs.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Pharmacological inhibition of PRMT5 activity decreases the frequency of ...
(A) The mixture of 2 × 105 BM cells from normal C57BL/6 mice with increasing numbers of CML BM cells (2 × 106, 1 × 106, or 5 × 105) from CML mice receiving IM, PJ-68, or their combination (n = 8 for each cell number) was transplanted into WT C57BL/6 mice irradiated at 550 cGy. Engraftment was monitored by analyzing peripheral blood (PB) every week, and GFP+ cells were detected in PB by flow cytometry. (B) The percentages of GFP+ cells at 16 weeks after transplantation. A percentage of GFP+ cells in PB greater than 0.5% was considered as positive engraftment. ***P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA, post hoc intergroup comparisons, Tukey’s test. Control (n = 23), IM (n = 14), PJ-68 (n = 18), PJ-68+IM (n = 22). (C) The frequency of LSCs after treatment is summarized in Table 1.
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts