Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • Gut-Brain Axis (Jul 2021)
    • Tumor Microenvironment (Mar 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Antihypertensive effects of selective prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 1 targeting
Youfei Guan, … , Richard M. Breyer, Matthew D. Breyer
Youfei Guan, … , Richard M. Breyer, Matthew D. Breyer
Published September 4, 2007
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2007;117(9):2496-2505. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI29838.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology

Antihypertensive effects of selective prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 1 targeting

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Clinical use of prostaglandin synthase–inhibiting NSAIDs is associated with the development of hypertension; however, the cardiovascular effects of antagonists for individual prostaglandin receptors remain uncharacterized. The present studies were aimed at elucidating the role of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) E-prostanoid receptor subtype 1 (EP1) in regulating blood pressure. Oral administration of the EP1 receptor antagonist SC51322 reduced blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. To define whether this antihypertensive effect was caused by EP1 receptor inhibition, an EP1-null mouse was generated using a “hit-and-run” strategy that disrupted the gene encoding EP1 but spared expression of protein kinase N (PKN) encoded at the EP1 locus on the antiparallel DNA strand. Selective genetic disruption of the EP1 receptor blunted the acute pressor response to Ang II and reduced chronic Ang II–driven hypertension. SC51322 blunted the constricting effect of Ang II on in vitro–perfused preglomerular renal arterioles and mesenteric arteriolar rings. Similarly, the pressor response to EP1-selective agonists sulprostone and 17-phenyltrinor PGE2 were blunted by SC51322 and in EP1-null mice. These data support the possibility of targeting the EP1 receptor for antihypertensive therapy.

Authors

Youfei Guan, Yahua Zhang, Jing Wu, Zhonghua Qi, Guangrui Yang, Dou Dou, Yuansheng Gao, Lihong Chen, Xiaoyan Zhang, Linda S. Davis, Mingfeng Wei, Xuefeng Fan, Monica Carmosino, Chuanming Hao, John D. Imig, Richard M. Breyer, Matthew D. Breyer

×

Figure 4

Effect of i. v. infusion of EP1/EP3 receptor agonists on MAP in EP1–/– and EP1+/+ mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Effect of i. v. infusion of EP1/EP3 receptor agonists on MAP in EP1–/– a...
(A) Temporal course showing reduced pressor effects of the mixed EP1/EP3 agonist 17-phenyltrinor PGE2 (20 μg/kg i.v. bolus) in EP1–/– (n = 5) versus EP1+/+ (n = 3) mice. P < 0.0001, repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA. (B) Increase in peak MAP (at about 40–70 s) following 17-phenyltrinor PGE2 (20 μg/kg i.v. bolus) was significantly less in EP1–/– than in EP1+/+ mice. ****P < 0.0001. (C) Identical peak pressor response to the pure EP3 agonist MB28767 in EP1–/– (n = 3) and EP1+/+ (n = 4) mice. (D) The peak pressor response to sulprostone (Sulp), another EP1/EP3 agonist, was reduced in EP1–/– mice. ***P < 0.001. (E) Pretreatment of mice with the EP1-selective agonist SC51322 (n = 5) significantly reduced the peak pressor response to sulprostone. *P < 0.05.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts