EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) that are vulnerable to the EGFR antagonist osimertinib (Osi) eventually relapse, owing in part to the emergence of drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells that arise through epigenetic mechanisms. Intratumoral DTP cells can herald a worse clinical outcome, but the way in which DTP cells influence LUAD progression remains unclear. Osi-resistant (OR) cells exhibit typical DTP cell features, including a propensity to undergo senescence and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which can activate heightened secretory states. Therefore, we postulated that OR cells influence LUAD progression through paracrine mechanisms. To test this hypothesis, we utilized congenic pairs of EGFR-mutant LUAD cell lines in which drug-naive (DN) cells were rendered OR by chronic exposure to escalating doses of Osi. Cocultured in vitro or coinjected into mice, paracrine signals from OR cells enhanced the growth and metastatic properties of DN cells. EMT and senescence activated nonoverlapping secretomes, and OR cells governed DN cells by undergoing EMT but not senescence. Mechanistically, Osi rapidly increased TGF-β2 levels to initiate EMT, which triggered a Golgi remodeling process that accelerated the biogenesis and anterograde trafficking of secretory vesicles. The protumorigenic activity of OR cells was diminished by depletion of EMT-dependent secreted proteins or the EMT-activating transcription factor ZEB1. These findings identify paracrine mechanisms by which OR cells drive LUAD progression.
Madhurima Ghosh, Chao Wu, Abhishek Kumar, Monique Nilsson, John V. Heymach, Weina Zhao, Jiang Yu, Xin Liu, Na Ding, Shike Wang, Guan-Yu Xiao, Angelo Chen, Kate Grimley, William K. Russell, Chad J. Creighton, Xiaochao Tan, Jonathan M. Kurie
Usage data is cumulative from December 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,333 | 255 |
| 956 | 49 | |
| Figure | 806 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 614 | 20 |
| Citation downloads | 184 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,893 | 324 |
| Total Views | 6,217 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.