Chronic pain is a complex clinical problem comprising multiple conditions that may share a common genetic profile. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many risk loci whose cell-type context remains unclear. Here, we integrated GWAS data on chronic pain (N = 1,235,695) with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from human brain and dorsal root ganglia (hDRG), and single-cell chromatin accessibility data from human brain and mouse dorsal horn. Pain-associated variants were enriched in glutamatergic neurons; mainly in prefrontal cortex, hippocampal CA1-3, and amygdala. In hDRG, the hPEP.TRPV1/A1.2 neuronal subtype showed robust enrichment. Chromatin accessibility analyses revealed variant enrichment in excitatory and inhibitory neocortical neurons in brain and in midventral neurons and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the mouse dorsal horn. Gene-level heritability in the brain highlighted roles for kinase activity, GABAergic synapses, axon guidance, and neuron projection development. In hDRG, implicated genes related to glutamatergic signaling and neuronal projection. In cervical DRG of patients with acute or chronic pain (N = 12), scRNA-seq data from neuronal or non-neuronal cells were enriched for chronic pain-associated genes (e.g., EFNB2, GABBR1, NCAM1, SCN11A). This cell-type-specific genetic architecture of chronic pain across central and peripheral nervous system circuits provides a foundation for targeted translational research.
Sylvanus Toikumo, Marc Parisien, Michael J. Leone, Chaitanya Srinivasan, Huasheng Yu, Asta Arendt-Tranholm, Úrzula Franco-Enzástiga, Christoph Hofstetter, Michele Curatolo, Wenqin Luo, Andreas R. Pfenning, Rebecca P. Seal, Rachel L. Kember, Theodore J. Price, Luda Diatchenko, Stephen G. Waxman, Henry R. Kranzler
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,064 | 0 |
| 431 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 132 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,672 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,672 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.