The increasing recognition of a new category of encephalitides that occur in association with antibodies against neuronal surface proteins has prompted the use of terms like “autoimmune psychosis” and “autoimmune psychiatric disorders.” However, although psychosis and other psychiatric symptoms can occur in autoimmune encephalitides and systemic autoimmune diseases, evidence for a distinct psychiatric entity beyond these conditions is lacking. A particularly defining condition is anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, which has been central to promoting concepts such as autoimmune psychosis and autoimmune psychiatric disorders. While anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis can resemble primary psychiatric conditions, certain clinical features often suggest the specific diagnosis. This Review traces the development of the autoimmune psychosis concept and examines the implications of framing it as a separate entity. We discuss leading theories of psychosis and the convergence of the NMDA receptor hypofunction/glutamate hypothesis with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis mechanisms. The interest generated by such disorders has driven uncontrolled antibody testing in psychiatric populations, often neglecting pretest probability and favoring prevalence over diagnostic specificity. Finally, we highlight the main limitations of current approaches and propose directions for future research.
José Maria Cabrera-Maqueda, Jesús Planagumà, Mar Guasp, Josep Dalmau
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through February 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 5,064 | 378 |
| 1,266 | 184 | |
| Figure | 652 | 0 |
| Table | 477 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 108 | 0 |
| Totals | 7,567 | 562 |
| Total Views | 8,129 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.