A cornerstone of research to improve cancer outcomes involves studies of model systems to identify causal drivers of oncogenesis, understand mechanisms leading to metastases, and develop new therapeutics. Although most cancer types are represented by large cell line panels that reflect diverse neoplastic genotypes and phenotypes found in patients, prostate cancer is notable for a very limited repertoire of models that recapitulate the pathobiology of human disease. Of these, the lymph node carcinoma of the prostate (LNCaP) cell line has served as the major resource for basic and translational studies. Here, we delineated the molecular composition of LNCaP and multiple substrains through analyses of whole-genome sequences, transcriptomes, chromatin structure, androgen receptor (AR) cistromes, and functional studies. Our results determined that LNCaP exhibits substantial subclonal diversity, ongoing genomic instability, and phenotype plasticity. Several oncogenic features were consistently present across strains, but others were unexpectedly variable, such as ETV1 expression, Y chromosome loss, a reliance on WNT and glucocorticoid receptor activity, and distinct AR alterations maintaining AR pathway activation. These results document the inherent molecular heterogeneity and ongoing genomic instability that drive diverse prostate cancer phenotypes and provide a foundation for the accurate interpretation and reproduction of research findings.
Arnab Bose, Armand Bankhead III, Ilsa Coleman, Thomas Persse, Wanting Han, Patricia Galipeau, Brian Hanratty, Tony Chu, Jared Lucas, Dapei Li, Rabeya Bilkis, Pushpa Itagi, Sajida Hassan, Mallory Beightol, Minjeong Ko, Ruth Dumpit, Michael Haffner, Colin Pritchard, Gavin Ha, Peter S. Nelson
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through February 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,742 | 77 |
| 552 | 24 | |
| Figure | 464 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 406 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 70 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,234 | 105 |
| Total Views | 3,339 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.