Epidermal growth factor receptor–activating (EGFR-activating) mutations are established biomarkers of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in lung cancer, yet the precise molecular mechanism and effective therapeutic strategies remain elusive. In this study, we show that EGFR overexpression and amplification recapitulated the negative effect of EGFR driver mutations on the ICB response, indicating a proactive involvement of EGFR signaling in antagonizing the antitumor immune response. Functional studies unveiled that EGFR activation suppressed the cellular response to IFN-γ following ICB treatment across multiple cancer models. This impairment in IFN-γ responsiveness further limited the upregulation of T cell–recruiting chemokines and antigen presentation, resulting in reduced T cell infiltration and activation, ultimately undermining antitumor immunity. Mechanistically, EGFR promotes Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) activation to accelerate STAT1 dephosphorylation, leading to premature termination of the IFN-γ response. SHP2 inhibition restored ICB sensitivity in EGFR-activated tumors, significantly reducing tumor burden while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Our findings suggest that the EGFR/SHP2 axis functions as a molecular brake to disrupt the initiation and amplification of the IFN-γ–mediated antitumor response during immunotherapy. This discovery unveils a potential avenue to overcome immunotherapy resistance in EGFR-driven tumors, particularly lung cancer, through SHP2-targeted combination strategies.
Wei-Tao Zhuang, Lan-Lan Pang, Li-Yang Hu, Jun Liao, Jian-Hua Zhan, Ting Li, Ri-Xin Chen, Jia-Ni Zheng, An-Lin Li, Wen-Yan Yu, Tian-Qin Mao, Liang Chen, Yu-Jian Huang, Shao-Dong Hong, Jing Li, Jun-Han Wu, Yi-Ming Zeng, Meng-Juan Yang, Hai-Qing Zeng, Ya-Xiong Zhang, Li Zhang, Wen-Feng Fang
Usage data is cumulative from January 2026 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,785 | 0 |
| 700 | 0 | |
| Figure | 188 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 454 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 80 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,207 | 0 |
| Total Views | 3,207 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.