Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research ArticleGastroenterologyInflammation Open Access | 10.1172/JCI190575

Concomitant COX-1 and COX-2 suppression is not sufficient to induce enteropathy associated with chronic NSAID use

Kayla Barekat,1 Soumita Ghosh,1 Christin Herrmann,2 Karl Keat,3 Charles-Antoine Assenmacher,4 Ceylan Tanes,5 Naomi Wilson,5 Ronan Lordan,1 Antonijo Mrčela,1 Lubica Rauova,6 Arjun Sengupta,7 Ujjalkumar Subhash Das,1 Robin Joshi,1 Elliot Friedman,8 Marylyn D. Ritchie,3 Kyle Bittinger,5 Aalim Weljie,7 Ken Cadwell,2 Frederic D. Bushman,9 Gary D. Wu,8 Garret A. FitzGerald,1,7 and Emanuela Ricciotti7

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Barekat, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Ghosh, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Herrmann, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Keat, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Assenmacher, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Tanes, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Wilson, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Lordan, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Mrčela, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Rauova, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Sengupta, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Das, U. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Joshi, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Friedman, E. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Ritchie, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Bittinger, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Weljie, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Cadwell, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Bushman, F. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Wu, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by FitzGerald, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,

2Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and

3Division of Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

4Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

5Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, and

6Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

7Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,

8Department of Microbiology, and

9Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Find articles by Ricciotti, E. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published January 27, 2026 - More info

Published in Volume 136, Issue 6 on March 16, 2026
J Clin Invest. 2026;136(6):e190575. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190575.
© 2026 Barekat et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published January 27, 2026 - Version history
Received: January 10, 2025; Accepted: January 15, 2026
View PDF
Abstract

NSAIDs are the most widely used medications for the management of chronic pain; however, they are associated with numerous gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Although many mechanisms have been suggested, NSAID-induced enteropathy is thought to be primarily due to inhibition of both COX-1 and -2, which results in suppression of prostaglandin synthesis. Yet surprisingly, we found that concomitant postnatal deletion of Cox-1 and -2 over 10 months failed to cause intestinal injury in mice unless they were treated with naproxen or its structural analog, phenylpropionic acid, which is not a COX inhibitor. Cox double-knockout mice exhibited a distinct gut microbiome composition, and cohousing them with controls rescued their dysbiosis and delayed the onset of NSAID-induced GI bleeding. In both the UK Biobank and All of Us human cohorts, coadministration of antibiotics with NSAIDs was associated with an increased frequency of GI bleeding. These results showed that prostaglandin suppression played a trivial role in NSAID-induced enteropathy. However, Cox deletion caused dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, which amplified the enteropathic response to NSAIDs.

Introduction

NSAIDs are the most widely used medications for the management of chronic pain and inflammation, with tens of millions of people worldwide consuming them daily (1, 2). NSAIDs are not addictive like opiates, but they are still associated with gastrointestinal (GI) (3) and cardiovascular (4) adverse events. Endoscopic studies have estimated the prevalence of inflammation in 60%–70%, blood loss and anemia in 30%, and mucosal ulceration in 30%–40% of chronic users (5, 6). Notably, there is a wide range of interindividual variation in response to NSAIDs – in both safety and efficacy – which cannot be fully explained by genetic differences in host metabolizing enzymes (7, 8). While the mechanisms underlying NSAID-induced gastropathy are well established (9–17). NSAID-induced enteropathy remains poorly understood, and there is still no treatment or preventative solution for the intestinal symptoms.

The antiinflammatory, analgesic efficacy of NSAIDs is attributable to suppression of prostaglandins by COX-1 and -2 (18, 19). COX-1 is the more constitutively expressed isoform, while COX-2 is induced by inflammatory and mitogenic stimuli (20). However, these distinctions are not absolute: COX-1 can be upregulated under certain circumstances (21–24), and COX-2 is constitutively expressed in some tissues (25–29). Enteropathy has been attributed to inhibition of COX-1–dependent synthesis of prostaglandin (PG) E2 and prostacyclin (PGI2) in intestinal epithelial cells, which are involved in protection of the mucosal barrier (30). This is compounded by inhibition of COX-1–dependent thromboxane (Tx) A2 formation in platelets, predisposing to hemorrhage (31). However, pharmacological inhibition or genetic deletion of COX-1 alone does not result in spontaneous enteric lesions (32, 33). Conventional deletion of both COXs is embryonically lethal, but combined genetic deletion of one and pharmacological inhibition of the other (as well as pharmacological inhibition of both) result in enterotoxicity (33–35). COX-2–derived PGs also play key roles in intestinal mucosal defense (36) and injury repair (37, 38). Yet similar to the case of COX-1 suppression alone, COX-2 suppression alone results in little to no enteric injury relative to nonselective NSAIDs in mice (39–42). In humans, clinical trials in arthritis have shown that selective inhibition of COX-2 roughly halves the incidence of GI bleeds compared with mixed inhibitors (43, 44), and although expression of both enzymes is upregulated in inflammatory synovia (45), comparative efficacy trials of selective versus nonselective NSAIDs have not been performed.

While PG suppression has been thought to be the dominant cause of NSAID enteropathy, additional factors, including direct chemical toxicity (46–48), disruption of mitochondrial function (49, 50), intestinal dysbiosis (51–57), and bile acid toxicity (58–60), have also been implicated. To address further the mechanisms that underlie NSAID enteropathy, we developed 2 reagents: (a) mice in which deletion of both enzymes is achieved postnatally, thereby circumventing the critical role of COXs in pregnancy and embryonic development (61, 62); and (b) a chronic dosing model with the NSAID naproxen, where drug exposure and PG suppression correspond to what is seen in humans (63, 64). To our surprise, there was minimal evidence of enteropathy consequent to Cox deletion, whereas naproxen-induced GI toxicity was amplified in the double knockouts (DKOs). As PG suppression was comparable between the DKOs and naproxen treatment, it is not the explanation for the NSAID enterotoxicity. Rather, drug interactions with the gut microbiome are of more importance.

Results

Inducible Cox-1 and -2 deletion mouse model demonstrates that chronic PG depletion alone does not result in spontaneous GI injury. Upon confirmation that Cox-1 and -2 are expressed in human epithelial cells (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190575DS1), we developed a tamoxifen-inducible universal Cre-recombinase mouse line with loxP sites flanking both Cox-1 and -2. We first confirmed that these Cox-1fl/fl Cox-2fl/fl CMV-Cre+/– (Cox-DKO) mice exhibited reduced expression of the genes in 2 separate tissues (Supplemental Figure 2A), as well as reduced protein levels in small intestine under stimulated conditions (Supplemental Figure 2, B–E). We next confirmed PG suppression in vivo in the DKOs by measuring urinary metabolites over a sustained period (Figure 1A). This difference from Cre–/– control littermates was evoked further by stimulation of PG synthesis with LPS, which induces Cox expression (Figure 1B). Blinded assessment of tissue histology (Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 3) failed to detect GI ulcers or visible signs of enteropathy (Figure 1C) 10 months after tamoxifen-induced genetic deletion (~1 year of age) in the DKOs. Furthermore, no blood was detected in the stool of any individual mouse with weekly hemoccult testing (Figure 1D). Thus, marked suppression of PG synthesis alone does not result in gastroenteropathy.

Postnatal deletion of Cox-1 and -2 reveals that chronic PG depletion aloneFigure 1

Postnatal deletion of Cox-1 and -2 reveals that chronic PG depletion alone is not sufficient to induce spontaneous GI injury in mice. (A) Longitudinal tracking of universal inducible Cox-DKO mice was conducted over 10 months after tamoxifen exposure (administered at 10–12 weeks of age). Monthly urinary PGI2 (PGIM), PGD2 (PGDM), PGE2 (PGDM), and thromboxane (TxM) metabolite levels measured by LC-MS/MS, analyzed separately for each sex. n = 14 Cox-DKO mice and 6 Cre–/– controls. (B) Attempted induction of PG synthesis in Cox-DKO mice via LPS challenge. Mice received 1 mg/kg BW LPS by i.p. injection, and urine was collected overnight. n = 7–9 mice per group. Urinary PG metabolites measured by LC-MS/MS for male and female Cox-DKO mice and Cre–/– controls at baseline versus post-LPS exposure. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA. (C) Total ulcer count throughout the entire GI tract (including stomach, small intestine, and large intestine), as counted by a blinded pathologist, paired with qualitative/semiquantitative pathology scores throughout the entire GI tract for longitudinal tracking experiment. Each data point represents a single mouse. (D) Weekly hemoccult test results plotted as a Kaplan-Meier curve for percentage of each group that tested negative for blood in the stool. Any individual that tested positive was marked positive for that first week and all subsequent weeks, resembling a survival curve.

Table 1

GI pathology scoring criteria

Chronic naproxen treatment in WT mice recapitulates signs of NSAID-induced enteropathy observed in human patients. Naproxen is a nonselective NSAID that can elicit GI injury in both mice and humans, while celecoxib, selective for inhibition of COX-2, is associated with a reduced GI toxicity profile (44). Naproxen was chosen for our chronic NSAID dosing model because it is commonly used for long-term daily treatment in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, owing to its long half-life and relatively favorable cardiovascular profile (63). To establish our chronic NSAID dosing model, C57BL/6 WT mice were fed a custom diet with either naproxen (230 mg/kg), celecoxib (100 mg/kg), or no drug (control) dry-mixed into it and were allowed to feed ad libitum for 3 full weeks prior to tissue collection. Plasma drug concentrations at steady state for both NSAIDs corresponded to human systemic drug exposure under chronic dosing conditions (63–66) (Supplemental Figure 4A). As reported in humans, mice treated with naproxen — but not those treated with celecoxib — showed a significant reduction in serum TxB2 (Supplemental Figure 5A). The half-life of naproxen in mice is approximately 7.5 hours (Supplemental Figure 5B).

Within 3 weeks of exposure, naproxen (but not celecoxib) caused GI ulcers and inflammation in some mice, more severely in females and mostly located in the small intestine (Figure 2A). Some of the mice with enteropathy showed signs of anemia (Figure 2B), neutrophilia and lymphopenia (Figure 2C), an increase in spleen weight relative to BW (Figure 2D), and decreases in albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and total serum proteins (Figure 2E). In summary, levels of systemic naproxen exposure that correspond to those attained clinically result in intestinal ulceration, intestinal and systemic inflammation, GI bleeding, anemia, and protein deficiency characteristic of NSAID-induced enteropathy in humans.

Chronic naproxen dosing in mice mimics NSAID enteropathy in humans.Figure 2

Chronic naproxen dosing in mice mimics NSAID enteropathy in humans. WT C57BL/6J mice were treated with either control diet, celecoxib diet (100 mg/kg), or naproxen diet (230 mg/kg) and allowed to feed ad libitum for 3 weeks prior to tissue collection. (A) Ulcer count for total GI tract versus small intestine only as well as pathology score for total GI tract versus small intestine only; males and females are graphed separately. n = 4–6 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA. (B) Red blood cell count and hemoglobin measured by complete blood count (CBC); males and females are graphed separately. n = 6–9 mice per group. *P < 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA. (C) Percentage of neutrophils and lymphocytes relative to all white blood cells measured by CBC; males and females are graphed separately. n = 6–9 mice per group. **P < 0.01 by 1-way ANOVA. (D) Spleen weight relative to total BW; males and females are graphed separately. n = 6–9 mice per group. **P < 0.01 by 1-way ANOVA. (E) Serum proteins and liver enzymes measured by clinical automated chemistry analyzer; males and females are graphed separately. n = 3–5 mice per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by 1-way ANOVA (top) or unpaired 1-tailed t test (bottom).

Naproxen-induced enteropathy is more severe on Cox-DKO background. We next administered the same naproxen diet to Cox-DKO mice and Cre–/– control littermates. Urinary PGE2 and PGD2 metabolites were suppressed in both sexes to a similar degree by Cox deletion and naproxen treatment, while urinary Tx-M was depressed in both sexes in the DKOs but not on naproxen. Addition of naproxen to the DKO mice did not significantly further depress PG synthesis (Figure 3A). DKO mice exhibited blood in the stool (Figure 3B), weight loss (Figure 3C), and ulcers (Figure 3D) only when they were treated with naproxen. However, naproxen-induced GI injury was amplified when given on a background of Cox depletion. This was also true of indirect indices of GI blood loss: reticulocytosis and anemia (Figure 3E), neutrophilia and lymphopenia (Figure 3F), and increased spleen weight (Figure 3G). As an additional marker of GI inflammation, fecal calprotectin — a calcium-binding protein found in granulocytes that correlates closely with neutrophil infiltration of the intestinal mucosa — was found to be elevated only in mice treated with naproxen (Figure 3H).

Naproxen enteropathy is exacerbated in Cox-DKO mice.Figure 3

Naproxen enteropathy is exacerbated in Cox-DKO mice. Cox-DKO and Cre–/– control mice were treated with either control diet or naproxen diet (230 mg/kg) and allowed to feed ad libitum for 3 weeks prior to tissue collection. n = 7–10 mice per group for entire figure. (A) Urinary PG metabolites measured by LC-MS/MS, analyzed separately for each sex. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA. (B) Weekly hemoccult test results plotted as a Kaplan-Meier curve for percentage of each group that tested negative for blood in the stool. Any individual that tested positive was marked positive for that first week and all subsequent weeks, resembling a survival curve. (C) Percent change in BW relative to baseline BW. (D) Ulcer count for total GI tract versus small intestine only as well as pathology score for total GI tract versus small intestine only; males and females are graphed separately. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA. (E) Red blood cells, hemoglobin, and reticulocytes measured by CBC. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA. (F) Percentage of neutrophils and lymphocytes relative to all white blood cells measured by CBC. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA. (G) Spleen weight relative to total BW. ****P < 0.0001 by 1-way ANOVA. (H) Fecal calprotectin measured by ELISA. *P < 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA.

As a further control, we repeated the chronic naproxen dosing experiment in DKO mice and Cre–/– littermates using (R)-(–)-2-phenylpropionic acid (PPA), which is a weakly acidic structural analog of naproxen that lacks its COX inhibitory property (67) and should thus be roughly equivalent to untreated Cre–/– mice in terms of urinary PG metabolite measurements. The same concentration of PPA (230 mg/kg) as naproxen was dry-mixed into the diet, and mice were allowed to feed ad libitum for 3 weeks prior to tissue harvest. As expected, PPA did not depress PG synthesis (Supplemental Figure 6A), but it did cause anemia (Supplemental Figure 6B) and enteropathy (Supplemental Figure 6C), again exacerbated by Cox depletion as observed with naproxen. Unlike naproxen, PPA did not cause weight loss (Supplemental Figure 6D). Many of the Cox-DKOs on PPA exhibited some degree of GI injury, whereas the Cre–/– controls were mostly unaffected. Of note, the injury induced by PPA was more heavily localized to the stomach than the small intestine. PPA does not undergo notable enterohepatic recirculation; therefore, it causes intestinal damage primarily through direct contact with the intestinal mucosa, but to a lesser extent than naproxen, which, in addition to directly damaging the intestinal mucosa, undergoes enterohepatic recirculation and inhibits protective PGs. In summary, although PG suppression alone – by Cox depletion – does not cause enteropathy, it enhances the sensitivity of the mice to enteropathy induced by naproxen or its structural analog PPA.

Cox-DKO mice exhibit distinct gut microbiome composition at baseline, predisposing them to more severe enteropathy upon naproxen treatment. Given the extensive literature reports that pharmacological inhibition of COX isozymes is associated with dysbiosis in both rodents and humans (51, 53, 54, 57, 68–70), we performed 16S rRNA sequencing of feces from the DKOs and Cre–/– controls to investigate the effect of adult COX-1 and COX-2 deletion on the composition of the gut microbiome. Littermates were separated by genotype shortly after weaning, prior to tamoxifen exposure. The heatmap summary shows that the baseline gut microbiome differed by genotype (Figure 4A), with the Cox-DKOs displaying an increased relative abundance of Prevotella and a decreased relative abundance of Turicibacter and Dubosiella. Both sexes exhibited distinct microbiome composition by genotype when taking into account abundance of taxa (weighted UniFrac distance, male P = 0.001, female P = 0.005), but only females showed differences based on presence versus absence of taxa (unweighted UniFrac distance, male P = 0.08, female P = 0.02) (Figure 4B). After naproxen treatment, microbiome composition still differed by genotype for both the weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance metrics (Figure 4C; male P = 0.001, female P = 0.005 for weighted UniFrac; male P = 0.03, female P = 0.03 for unweighted UniFrac). Microbiome differences did not manifest with treatment alone, and the effect of genotype was independent of treatment. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio was also altered in the Cox-DKO mice (Figure 4D; baseline: male P = 0.004, female P = 0.03; after treatment: male P = 0.004, female P = 0.01).

Divergent gut microbiome composition at baseline predisposes Cox-DKO mice tFigure 4

Divergent gut microbiome composition at baseline predisposes Cox-DKO mice to more severe enteropathy when treated with naproxen. Cox-DKO and Cre–/– control mice were treated with either control diet or naproxen diet (230 mg/kg) and allowed to feed ad libitum for either 10 days (separately housed by genotype) or 21 days (cohoused) prior to tissue collection; difference in duration was due to increased rate of naproxen-induced weight loss when mice were separately housed by genotype. n = 7–10 mice per group for entire figure. (A) Baseline bacterial taxa relative abundance heatmap including taxa at genus level or higher with an average relative abundance of at least 1% across all fecal samples. White tiles indicate no detection. (B and C) Beta diversity principal coordinate analysis PCoA plots of bacterial UniFrac distances at baseline (B) and after 10 days of naproxen treatment (C). Ellipses denote 95% confidence intervals on genotypes: control (black) and Cox-DKO (gray). (D) Box plots of the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidota relative abundances at baseline (top) and after 10 days of naproxen treatment (bottom). (E) Box plots of differentially abundant taxa between genotypes at baseline. Top: separately housed animals. Bottom: cohoused animals. The box plots in D and E depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. (F) Change in BW relative to baseline in separately housed (10 days) versus cohoused (21 days) experiments.

The relative increase in Gram-negative relative to Gram-positive taxa in the Cox-DKO mice is consistent with previously published data on NSAID-induced enteropathy (51, 53, 54, 68–70). However, here, we associated this result with PG suppression in the absence of enteropathy and, unlike prior acute studies with other NSAIDs, we did not observe dysbiosis with chronic dosing of naproxen alone. High-abundance genera or families that were distinct between Cox-DKOs and control mice at baseline included Turicibacter (male q = 0.17, female q < 0.05), Dubosiella (male q < 0.05), Prevotellaceae (male q = 0.06, female q < 0.05), and Alistipes (male q < 0.05, female q = 0.1). However, these differential patterns were markedly dampened when littermate animals were not separated by genotype (all q > 0.05), shifting the Cox-DKO gut microbiome composition toward that of the controls (Figure 4E). No taxa met the FDR cutoff when littermates were not separated by genotype (Supplemental Figure 7, A and B). This cohousing of the Cox-DKOs with controls also delayed the onset of naproxen-induced weight loss (Figure 4F), suggesting a protective role of commensal microbiota (68, 70) from NSAID-associated enteropathy. These patterns remained consistent in species-level analyses. We found that Lactobacillus murinus, Bacteroides uniformus, Bacteroides acidifaciens, and an uncultured Bacteroides species were more abundant in the DKOs when separately housed by genotype (Supplemental Figure 8, A and B), but no statistically significant differences were detected at species level when cohoused (Supplemental Figure 8C).

Chronic naproxen treatment elicits a distinct pattern in gut microbe–dependent bile acid conjugation, and suppression of bile acid synthesis is protective against naproxen-induced enteropathy. We sought bacteria-derived metabolites of functional relevance that might result from the dysbiosis consequent to Cox depletion. A targeted measurement of entero-protective short-chain fatty acids (Supplemental Figure 9A) and an untargeted screen of metabolites (Supplemental Figure 9B) failed to identify candidates. Similarly, Cox depletion did not impact immune cells, as measured by flow cytometry, that could predispose the mice to exacerbate NSAID-induced enteropathy; proinflammatory patterns in myeloid cells that did not discriminate by genotype were only detected with naproxen challenge (Supplemental Figure 10). We also used an acute dose of indomethacin, an NSAID known to undergo enterohepatic recirculation, to address the possibility that the DKO-induced dysbiosis might influence bacterial glucuronidase activity to modify the duration of drug exposure (55, 60, 71) (Supplemental Figure 11A). However, no difference in glucuronidated versus parent indomethacin was observed between DKOs and controls (Supplemental Figure 11B).

Naproxen also undergoes enterohepatic recirculation, and intestinal bacteria may influence bile acid conjugation; deconjugation of primary bile acids has been shown to increase their toxicity to intestinal mucosa (70, 72). We observed that naproxen exposure in WT C57BL/6 mice resulted in decreased bile acid conjugation (Figure 5A). Bile acids activate the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), which downregulates CYP7A1 and thereby the hepatic conversion of cholesterol to primary bile acids. Here, we showed that the FXR agonist GW4064 suppressed total bile acid levels in the proximal small intestinal lumen relative to vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose) on a Cox-DKO background (Figure 5B). This suppression was largely driven by the most abundant bile acid subtype, taurocholic acid (Figure 5C). We then demonstrated that coadministration of the FXR agonist with naproxen protected against naproxen-induced GI bleeding (Figure 5D) and reduced ulcer count and pathology score (Figure 5E), and this protective effect was predominantly seen in the small intestine.

Distinct gut microbe–dependent bile acid conversions are observed with chroFigure 5

Distinct gut microbe–dependent bile acid conversions are observed with chronic naproxen treatment, and suppression of bile acid synthesis protects against naproxen-induced enteropathy in a COX-independent manner. (A) WT C57BL/6J mice were treated with either control diet, celecoxib diet (100 mg/kg), or naproxen diet (230 mg/kg) and allowed to feed ad libitum for 3 weeks prior to tissue collection. n = 5–9 mice per group. Bile acids (BAs) were measured in intestinal luminal content samples via UPLC. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by 1-way ANOVA. (B–E) Cox-DKO mice were fed naproxen diet (230 mg/kg) ad libitum, paired with either 30 mg/kg GW4064 or 0.5% methylcellulose (vehicle) by twice daily oral gavage for 10 days. n = 6 mice per group, females only. (B) Total bile acids in proximal small intestine luminal contents measured by UPLC. *P < 0.05 by unpaired 1-tailed t test. (C) Individual bile acids in proximal small intestine luminal contents measured by UPLC. (D) Hemoccult test reported as percentage of mice that tested positive in each treatment group within the 10-day period. (E) Ulcer count for total GI tract versus small intestine only as well as pathology score for total GI tract versus small intestine only. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by unpaired 1-tailed t test.

We also validated microbiome-dependent bile acid patterns in a separate 16S study of C57BL/6 WT mice treated with naproxen that could help explain the observed sexual dimorphism. In this dataset, we identified 3 differentially abundant taxa in females on naproxen that were not differentially abundant in males: Firmicutes Clostridium, Firmicutes Lachnospiraceae, and Firmicutes Lachnoclostridium (Supplemental Figure 12, A and B). The first of these taxa yielded the same pattern and direction as for the lactobacilli seen in the DKOs; an increase in Firmicutes Clostridium results in increased bile salt hydrolase (73), which results in more deconjugation of primary bile acids specifically in female mice treated with naproxen. The other 2 differentially abundant taxa in the WT naproxen females do not possess bile salt hydrolase, but do possess 7α-dehydroxylase, which is responsible for converting primary bile acids to secondary bile acids; a decrease in Firmicutes Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 results in decreased bile acid 7α-dehydroxylation (74), which results in less conversion of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids. The same applies with the decrease in Firmicutes Lachnoclostridium (75). Both mechanisms could help explain the increase in the percentage of primary bile acids in the naproxen-treated females.

Administration of NSAIDs and antibiotics together results in higher risk of GI bleeding in 2 separate human patient cohorts. To address the possibility that the gut microbiome might influence NSAID-induced enteropathy in humans, we assessed the impact of coincident antibiotic treatment with NSAIDs on enteropathy in 2 human retrospective cohorts: the UK Biobank (76) and All of Us Research Program (77). In both data sets, the incidence of NSAID-associated GI bleeding was greater when they were coadministered with antibiotics, potentially implicating the ablation of protective commensal bacteria (68, 70) (Figure 6, A and B). For the UK Biobank population, the relative incidence of GI bleeding for patients taking NSAIDs alone versus in combination with antibiotics was 6.87% versus 9.48% (Figure 6A, P = 1.9 × 10–35). For the All of Us population, the relative incidence of GI bleeding for patients taking NSAIDs alone versus in combination with antibiotics was 4.10% versus 8.47% (Figure 6B, P < 1.0 × 10–100).

Coincident administration of NSAIDs and antibiotics in humans increases theFigure 6

Coincident administration of NSAIDs and antibiotics in humans increases the risk of GI bleeding. Queries of GI ulceration and bleeding rates in human patients taking NSAIDs alone, antibiotics alone, or concurrent NSAIDs and antibiotics using UK Biobank (A) and All of Us (B). For the UK Biobank (UKBB) population, the relative incidence of GI bleeding for patients taking NSAIDs alone versus in combination with antibiotics was 6.87% versus 9.48% (P = 1.9 × 10–35); for the All of Us population, the relative incidence of GI bleeding for patients taking NSAIDs alone versus in combination with antibiotics was 4.10% versus 8.47% (P < 1.0 × 10–100). P values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test. (C–F) Validation of human NSAIDs with antibiotics GI bleeding patterns in mice. Cox-DKO mice were treated with either vancomycin (0.5 g/L dissolved in the drinking water) or control drinking water and fed either 1,323 ppm naproxen diet or control diet ad libitum for 1 week. n = 6–10 mice per group. (C) Survival plotted as a Kaplan-Meier curve. (D) Change in absolute BW over 1 week. (E) Percent change in BW relative to baseline BW over 1 week. (F) Hemoccult test reported as percentage of mice that tested positive in each treatment group within the 7-day period.

We then performed a validation study to determine whether we could replicate these human patterns in our Cox-DKO mouse model. We chose vancomycin as it targets Gram-positive bacteria and has been shown to shift the gut microbial composition toward a higher abundance of Gram-negative taxa, resulting in more severe naproxen-induced intestinal damage in rats (70). This is consistent with the baseline differences in the DKO microbiome relative to Cre–/– controls in Figure 4, as cohousing protects against naproxen-induced enteropathy by increasing the relative abundance of protective Gram-positive commensal bacteria in the DKOs. To push the taxonomic composition in a further Gram-negative direction, DKO mice were pretreated with either 0.5 g/L vancomycin dissolved in drinking water or untreated drinking water for 1 week. Then, baseline BW and feces were collected, and mice were further separated into naproxen diet or control diet treatment groups for an additional week. Several mice in the naproxen + vancomycin coadministration group did not survive the full week, contrary to naproxen or vancomycin treatment alone (Figure 6C). Furthermore, naproxen + vancomycin coadministration resulted in greater absolute (Figure 6D) and relative (Figure 6E) weight loss compared with the other 2 treatment groups. Naproxen + vancomycin coadministration also resulted in more mice with blood detected in the stool relative to naproxen or vancomycin treatment alone (Figure 6F). Despite baseline differences between human versus murine microbiome composition, this pattern of more severe NSAID-induced GI injury occurring with antibiotic coadministration is conserved across species.

Discussion

Although multiple mechanisms have been implicated in NSAID-induced enteropathy, here, we make the surprising observation that suppression of PG formation alone is of minimal, if any, importance. Prolonged follow-up of mice depleted postnatally of both COXs showed they did not develop enteropathy despite PG suppression. Furthermore, both the COX inhibitor naproxen and its structural analog, PPA, devoid of COX inhibitory activity evoke enteropathy in these mice. Thus, the enteropathy evoked by clinical levels of naproxen exposure is largely independent of its ability to suppress PG production.

A second surprising observation was that although adding naproxen to COX-depleted mice does not further suppress PG production, the severity of the NSAID-induced enteropathy is markedly augmented when compared with its evocation in WT mice. Depletion or inhibition of the COX enzymes caused dysbiosis of the gut microbiome and, consistent with prior observations, we observed a relative increase in Gram-negative taxa in the DKOs compared with control mice. While such a shift in the composition of the gut microbiota might have multiple effects of relevance to the augmentation of naproxen-evoked enteropathy, we saw no impact on absorbed bacterial metabolites, host immune function, or drug metabolism.

Consistent with a previous report (70), we found that naproxen may have increased bile acid cytotoxicity by promoting the deconjugation of primary bile acids in WT mice. Thus, coadministration of an FXR agonist to the DKO mice significantly reduced the severity of naproxen-evoked enteropathy, as previously reported in WT mice (78). Bile duct ligation also successfully prevents the formation of indomethacin-induced enteric ulcers in mice (51), further implicating bile acids as an important contributor to NSAID-induced enteropathy. We acknowledge that bile acid pathways in mice differ from those in humans. However, there is much functional redundancy amongst bile acid–modifying enzymes that bacterial taxa can possess (e.g., bile salt hydrolases; refs. 73, 79).

To acquire clinical evidence connecting the dysbiosis caused by PG suppression with NSAID-evoked enteropathy, we compared its incidence in patients with and without concomitant treatment with antibiotics. The higher rates of enteropathy in the UK Biobank and All of Us cohorts on the drug combination are consistent with the hypothesis that microbial ablation by the antibiotics removed commensals that limit NSAID-evoked tissue injury, whether by topical irritation, bile acids, or other mechanisms. Postoperatively, patients often receive both treatments. A limitation is that these databases cannot identify the location of injury within the GI tract. Also, this study does not evaluate the effects of social or most demographic factors on the risk of NSAID-induced small intestinal damage.

Although naproxen-induced enteropathy appears more common and severe in females in the mice, this observation requires further investigation, given the sample sizes and very limited support in existing literature (52, 80, 81). Similarly, clinical trials of NSAIDs are heavily biased toward inclusion of women (82–84), and interrogation of a sex-dependent incidence of NSAID-induced enteropathy in humans has been similarly underpowered (85–88). Our work frames the hypothesis that differential abundance of key bacterial taxa and their corresponding bile acid–modifying enzymes may contribute to the sexual dimorphism that we observed.

In summary, PG suppression plays a trivial role in NSAID-induced enteropathy. However, Cox deletion causes dysbiosis of the gut microbiome that amplifies the enteropathic response to NSAIDs.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable

Both male and female mice and humans were included throughout all experiments and analyzed separately versus combined to account for sex as a biological variable.

Animals

All mice were bred and maintained in our animal facility and fed ad libitum with standard chow diet (LabDiet 5010, Laboratory Autoclavable Rodent Diet) unless placed on a special formulated diet for a particular study. Mice were kept under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle, with lights on at 7 am and lights off at 7 pm. Male and female mice aged 10–12 weeks were used for all experiments, and data were always analyzed separately for each sex.

Genotypes

All mice were on a C57BL/6J background. Cox-1fl/fl mice (89) were gifted to us from the Herschman Lab at UCLA, and they were selectively bred with our tamoxifen-inducible Cox-2fx/fx CMV-Cre+/– mice (90) that we maintained in-house to yield the Cox-1fl/fl Cox-2fl/fl CMV-Cre+/– and Cox-1fl/fl Cox-2fl/fl CMV-Cre–/– mice that were used throughout these experiments for universal Cox-DKO and Cre–/– controls derived from the same litter. Primer sequences for genotyping were as follows: Cox-1 flox forward 1: 5′-TACCGCTGTCTCAGATTTTCCAGC-3′; Cox-1 flox reverse 1: 5′-GTGGAGCTGAAGCTAGGAAACAGC-3′; Cox-1 flox reverse 2: 5′-CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCTTCCG-3′; Cox-2 flox forward: 5′-TGAGGCAGAAAGAGGTCCAGCCTT-3′; Cox-2 flox reverse: 5′-ACCAATACTAGCTCAATAAGTGAC-3′; CMV-Cre forward: 5′-CGATGCAACGAGTGATGAGG-3′; CMV-Cre reverse: 5′-GCATTGCTGTCACTTGGTCGT-3′.

Chemicals

All chemicals and materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated.

Considerations for chronic NSAID dosing in mice

In humans, NSAID-induced enteropathy typically occurs after chronic NSAID exposure, as seen in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. To mimic this condition, we exposed mice to a 3-week naproxen-containing diet, during which they recapitulated many of the clinical features of NSAID-induced enteropathy observed in humans. After just 1 week of treatment, the mice began to show early signs of enteropathy, such as weight loss and positive fecal occult blood tests. We carefully dosed naproxen and celecoxib in mice to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations relevant to humans. A diet containing 230 mg/kg of naproxen corresponds to a human equivalent dose (HED) of 18.7 mg/kg, while a diet containing 100 mg/kg of celecoxib corresponds to an HED of 8.1 mg/kg. The HEDs were calculated from the animal doses using the formula reported by Nair and Jacob (64).

In vivo study designs

Study 1 design: longitudinal tracking of Cox-DKO mice. Baseline weight, feces, and urine were collected (prior to Cre-recombinase activation by tamoxifen). Then mice of both Cox-DKO and Cre–/– control genotypes were administered tamoxifen (200 mg/kg BW per day for 5 consecutive days, dissolved in 85% corn oil/15% ethanol solution) via oral gavage at approximately 10–12 weeks of age to induce genetic deletion of Cox-1 and Cox-2. One month was allowed for tamoxifen washout, then weight was measured and feces were collected weekly, and urine was collected monthly for 10 months (until the mice reached ~1 year of age). GI tissues were harvested and prepared for histology. n = 14 Cox-DKO mice and 6 Cre–/– controls.

Study 2 design: LPS challenge on Cox-DKO background. Mice of both Cox-DKO and Cre–/– control genotypes were administered tamoxifen (200 mg/kg BW per day for 5 consecutive days, dissolved in 85% corn oil/15% ethanol solution) via oral gavage at approximately 10–12 weeks of age to induce genetic deletion of Cox-1 and Cox-2. One month was allowed for tamoxifen washout. Then after baseline urine collection, mice received a single dose of LPS (1 mg/kg BW dissolved in 1× PBS) by i.p. injection, and urine was collected overnight in metabolic cages. n = 7-9 mice per group.

Study 3 design: pharmacokinetic time course of naproxen in WT mice. Adult WT C57BL/6J mice were fed 1,323 ppm naproxen diet (Envigo) ad libitum for 1 week to achieve steady state. Then blood was collected from the retroorbital vein at the following time points after naproxen exposure: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 16 hours. Plasma drug concentrations were then measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). n = 3–6 mice per time point, females only.

Study 4 design: chronic naproxen exposure on WT background. Adult WT C57BL/6J mice were fed control diet (Purina Lab Chow, Envigo) ad libitum for 2 weeks, at which point baseline weight was measured and feces and urine were collected. Then cages were assigned either control diet or an identical diet with 1,323 ppm naproxen or 550 ppm celecoxib dry-mixed into the formulation (Naproxen Custom Diet, Envigo) for 3 weeks. Weight was measured and feces were collected each week, and urine was collected at the end of the 3-week period prior to tissue harvest. GI tissues were fixed for histology, and blood was collected for complete blood counts and serum protein measurements. n = 6–9 mice per group.

Study 5 design: chronic naproxen exposure on Cox-DKO background. Mice of both Cox-DKO and Cre–/– control genotypes were administered tamoxifen (200 mg/kg BW per day for 5 consecutive days, dissolved in 85% corn oil/15% ethanol solution) via oral gavage at approximately 10–12 weeks of age to induce genetic deletion of Cox-1 and Cox-2. One month was allowed for tamoxifen washout, during which mice were fed control diet (Purina Lab Chow) ad libitum. Then after baseline weight measurement and feces and urine collection, cages were assigned either control diet or an identical diet with 1,323 ppm naproxen dry-mixed into the formulation (Naproxen Custom Diet) for 3 weeks. Weight was measured and feces were collected each week, and urine was collected at the end of the 3-week period before tissues were harvested. GI tissues were fixed for histology, and blood was collected for complete blood counts. This experiment was performed 2 slightly different ways to assess relative contribution of the gut microbiome and host immune system: (a) littermate mice of both genotypes cohoused in the same cage for the duration of the experiment and (b) littermate mice separated by genotype prior to tamoxifen administration; this second version was terminated at 10 days rather than 21 days due to increased rate of weight loss in Cox-DKO + naproxen cages. n = 7–10 mice per group.

Study 6 design: chronic PPA exposure on Cox-DKO background. Mice of both Cox-DKO and Cre–/– control genotypes were administered tamoxifen (200 mg/kg BW per day for 5 consecutive days, dissolved in 85% corn oil/15% ethanol solution) via oral gavage at approximately 10–12 weeks of age to induce genetic deletion of Cox-1 and Cox-2. One month was allowed for tamoxifen washout. Then after baseline weight measurement and feces and urine collection, mice were fed a diet with 1,323 ppm PPA dry-mixed into the formulation (PPA Custom Diet, Envigo) for 3 weeks. Weight was measured and feces were collected each week, and urine was collected at the end of the 3-week period before tissues were harvested and prepared for histology. n = 6–9 mice per group.

Study 7 design: coadministration of FXR agonist and naproxen on Cox-DKO background. Cox-1fl/fl Cox-2fl/fl CMV-Cre+/– mice were administered tamoxifen (200 mg/kg BW per day for 5 consecutive days, dissolved in 85% corn oil/15% ethanol solution) via oral gavage at approximately 10–12 weeks of age to induce genetic deletion of Cox-1 and Cox-2. One month was allowed for tamoxifen washout. All mice were fed 1,323 ppm naproxen diet ad libitum, paired with either 30 mg/kg BW GW4064 (BePharm Scientific) or 0.5% methylcellulose (vehicle) by twice daily oral gavage. Feces, small intestine luminal contents, and GI tissue were collected after 10 days of treatment. n = 6 mice per group, females only.

Study 8 design: microbiome-dependent elimination of indomethacin. Adult WT C57BL/6J mice were administered either an antibiotic cocktail (1 g/L ampicillin, 0.2 g/L vancomycin, 1 g/L neomycin, 1 g/L metronidazole, and 4 g/L aspartame) or vehicle (4 g/L aspartame) in their drinking water for 1 week prior to receiving a single dose of indomethacin (10 mg/kg BW dissolved in PEG400) via oral gavage, and urine was collected for the following 4 hours to measure indomethacin-glucuronide/indomethacin ratio. n = 4 mice per group. Additionally, separately housed Cox-DKO mice and Cre-negative controls were treated with a single dose of indomethacin (10 mg/kg BW dissolved in PEG400) via oral gavage, and urine was collected for the following 4 hours to measure urinary indomethacin-glucuronide/indomethacin ratio. n = 10–11 mice per group.

Study 9 design: coadministration of vancomycin and naproxen on Cox-DKO background. Cox-1fl/fl Cox-2fl/fl CMV-Cre+/– mice were administered tamoxifen (200 mg/kg BW per day for 5 consecutive days, dissolved in 85% corn oil/15% ethanol solution) via oral gavage at approximately 10–12 weeks of age to induce genetic deletion of Cox-1 and Cox-2. One month was allowed for tamoxifen washout. Then mice were treated with either vancomycin (0.5 g/L dissolved in the drinking water) or control drinking water for 1 week. After this pretreatment, baseline weight was measured and feces were collected. Then mice were fed either 1,323 ppm naproxen diet or control diet (Purina Lab Chow) ad libitum for 1 week, weight was measured, and feces were collected at days 2, 5, and 7. n = 6–10 mice per group.

MS analysis of prostanoids

Urinary PG metabolites were measured by LC-MS/MS as previously described (91). Briefly, urine samples were collected using metabolic cages over 4-hour periods. Labeled internal standards of known concentrations for metabolites of PGE2, PGD2, PGI2, and TxB2 were spiked into urine samples prior to solid phase extraction (SPE). Then SPE was performed using Strata-X 33 μm polymeric reversed phase cartridges (Phenomenex). Spectra were generated using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC system. Peak area ratios of target analytes to internal standards were calculated using TargetLynx 4.1 software (Waters). Urinary prostanoid metabolite measurements were normalized to urinary creatinine measurements.

Histological analysis of GI injury

All histology sectioning, staining, and analysis were performed at the Penn Vet Comparative Pathology Core (RRID:SCR_022438). Briefly, during dissection, the stomach was isolated, and intestinal tissues were separated into 4 segments: proximal small intestine (~duodenum), middle small intestine (~jejunum), distal small intestine (~ileum), and colon. The stomach was first injected with fixative (methacarn solution: 60% methanol, 30% chloroform, and 10% acetic acid) to preserve its shape, placed into a 50 mL conical tube filled with fixative, and later transferred to a cassette. Intestinal segments were Swiss rolled, placed into separate 50 mL conical tubes filled with fixative, and later transferred to cassettes. Samples were then transported to the core facility to be dehydrated with ethanol, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5 μm sections, and stained with H&E. Slides were then evaluated by a trained, fully blinded veterinary pathologist with no knowledge of respective treatment or genotype identities among the samples. The qualitative/semiquantitative scoring system included assessment of ulcer distribution (none, focal, or multifocal), number of ulcers, ulcer severity (superficial, up to muscularis mucosa, or transmural), presence of peritonitis/serositis, and inflammation (none, minimal, mild, moderate, or severe).

Fecal occult blood test

The Hemoccult Sensa Rapid Test Kit (Beckman Coulter) was used to detect blood in freshly collected stool samples on a weekly basis. Briefly, if hemoglobin is present in a fecal sample, the resulting peroxidase activity catalyzes the oxidation of α-guaiaconic acid (in the test strip) by hydrogen peroxide (in the developer solution) to form a conjugated blue quinone compound. If the test strip turns blue, then the fecal sample is positive for occult blood. Results were reported as positive or negative (not quantifiable beyond binary designation).

Complete blood count analysis

Whole blood (>100 μL per sample) was collected in K2EDTA-coated tubes to prevent clotting and briefly stored at room temperature. Samples were then immediately transported to the CHOP Translational Core Laboratory within 3–4 hours of collection to perform complete blood count (CBC) analysis using a Sysmex XT-2000iV automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex America).

Serum protein measurements

The serum proteins and liver enzymes were measured by the CHOP Translational Core using the Roche Cobas c311 platform, a clinical automated chemistry analyzer.

Fecal calprotectin measurements

Calprotectin was measured in murine stool samples. The samples were homogenized and analyzed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (100A8/A9/Calprotectin ELISA, Immunodiagnostik). Results were expressed as nanograms of calprotectin per microgram of sample.

16S rRNA gene sequencing

Library preparation (16S V1–V2 high biomass). Bacterial DNA was isolated from fecal and small intestine luminal content samples via the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen). Isolated samples were then submitted to the Penn CHOP Microbiome Core for all subsequent steps. Barcoded PCR primers annealing to the V1–V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene were used for library generation. PCR reactions were carried out in duplicate using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB). Each PCR reaction contained 0.5 μM each primer, 0.34 U Q5 polymerase, 1× buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, and 5 μL DNA in a total volume of 50 μL. Cycling conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 98°C for 1 minute; 20 cycles of 98°C for 10 seconds, 56°C for 20 seconds, and 72°C for 20 seconds; 1 cycle of 72°C for 8 minutes. After amplification, duplicate PCR reactions were pooled and purified using a 1:1 volume of SPRI beads. DNA in each sample was then quantified using PicoGreen and pooled in equal molar amounts. The resulting library was sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq using 2x250 bp chemistry. Extraction blanks and DNA-free water were subjected to the same amplification and purification procedure to allow for empirical assessment of environmental and reagent contamination. Positive controls, consisting of 8 artificial 16S gene fragments synthesized in gene blocks and combined in known abundances, were also included.

Bioinformatics processing. QIIME2 version 2023.2.0 (92) was employed to process sequencing reads with DADA2 version 1.26.0 (93) to denoise reads and identify amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). ASVs were assigned to taxonomies by sequence comparison to the SILVA 138 database (94) using a Naive Bayes classifier implemented in scikit-bio (95). MAFFT (96) was used to build a phylogenetic tree for calculating UniFrac distances (97, 98).

Statistical analyses. Statistical analyses of ASV tables and diversity metrics were performed with R libraries. UniFrac distances were visualized with principal coordinate analysis plots, and differences between study groups were assessed using permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) (99) with the adonisplus R package, which utilizes the vegan adonis2 software. PERMANOVAs were run with 999 permutations, and cage effect was accounted for by restricted shuffling of samples between cages. Differential abundance of any taxon with an average abundance of at least 0.1% across all fecal samples was assessed by generalized linear mixed effects models on log10-transformed relative abundances. Cage number was included as a random effect and genotype as a fixed effect. Multiple tests were adjusted for FDR using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

Bile acid measurements

Bile acid quantifications were performed by the Microbial Culture and Metabolomics Core of the Penn CHOP Microbiome Program and the Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases as described previously (100, 101). Briefly, luminal contents were collected neat into preweighed tubes from the proximal half of the small intestine, and each individual sample weight was recorded (between 25 and 100 mg per sample). Samples were stored at –80°C. Samples and sample weights were then submitted to the Microbial Culture & Metabolomics Core, and 16 different bile acids were quantified in each sample using a Waters ACQUITY ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system with a Cortecs UPLC C-18+ 1.6 μm 2.1 × 50 mm column and a QDa single quadrupole mass detector. Samples were suspended in methanol (5 μL/mg stool), vortexed for 1 minute, and centrifuged twice at 13,000g for 5 minutes. Intestinal flushes were vortexed for 1 minute and centrifuged twice at 13,000g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube, sealed, and stored at 4°C until analysis. The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min, the injection volume was 4 μL, the column temperature was 30°C, the sample temperature was 4°C, and the run time was 4 minutes per sample. Eluent A was 0.1% formic acid in water; eluent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile; the weak needle wash was 0.1% formic acid in water; the strong needle wash was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile; and the seal wash was 10% acetonitrile in water. The gradient was as follows: initial flow 70% eluent A; linear gradient to 100% eluent B over 2.5 minutes; hold at 100% eluent B for 0.6 minutes; and linear gradient to 70% eluent A over 0.9 minutes. The mass detection channels were as follows: +357.35 for chenodeoxycholic acid and deoxycholic acid; +359.25 for lithocholic acid; –407.5 for cholic, α-muricholic, β-muricholic, γ-muricholic, and ω-muricholic acids; –432.5 for glycolithocholic acid; –448.5 for glycochenodeoxycholic and glycodeoxycholic acids; –464.5 for glycocholic acid; –482.5 for taurolithocholic acid; –498.5 for taurochenodeoxycholic and taurodeoxycholic acids; and –514.4 for taurocholic acid. Samples were quantified against standard curves of at least 5 points and run in triplicate (chemicals obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology and Steraloids). Standard curves were run at the beginning and end of each metabolomics run. Blanks and standards were run every 8 samples. Measurements were normalized to luminal content sample weights.

NSAIDs/antibiotics queries in human databases

To study rates of GI bleeding following NSAID treatment and how those rates differ with concomitant antibiotic use in a real patient population, we created lists of NSAIDs and antibiotics that we queried in both the UK Biobank (76) and All of Us (77) databases. We defined patients taking concomitant NSAIDs and antibiotics as those taking antibiotics within 5 days of being prescribed an NSAID, filtering out prescriptions for topical antibiotics. We then compared rates of a composite GI phenotype as defined by 1 or more instances of peptic ulcer, gastrojejunal ulcer, gastric ulcer, or duodenal ulcer in the medical records of those who did and did not receive antibiotics. We also created a list of antibiotics that specifically target Gram-positive and -negative bacteria and compared rates of GI bleeding between those classes of antibiotics as well. All P values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test.

Further information may be found in Supplemental Methods.

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 9/10, QIIME/R Studio (for 16S sequencing analyses), or SciPy/Jupyter Notebook (for analyses in All of Us and UK Biobank). One-way ANOVA (P < 0.05 considered significant), unpaired 1-tailed t test (P < 0.05 considered significant), Fisher’s exact test, PERMANOVA, orthogonal partial least squares–discriminant analysis, and accompanying methods of FDR correction were all conducted as described in each figure legend. Wherever applicable, all data were plotted as mean ± SD.

Study approval

Experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institute for Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pennsylvania under protocol number 804445. The UK Biobank research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 32133.

Data availability

All underlying data values can be found in the Supporting Data Values file. The 16S sequencing data can be accessed through the following link in the Sequence Read Archive (SRP655337): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?term=SRP655337

Author contributions

KB wrote the manuscript, generated the Cox-DKO mouse line, designed/executed all in vivo experiments involving the transgenic mice, and directed collaborations regarding histology, flow cytometry, 16S sequencing, bile acids, metabolomics, and the human data. SG, USD, and RJ conducted all LC-MS/MS analyses. CH conducted the flow cytometry experiments. CAA performed all GI pathology scoring assessments. CT and NW conducted all 16S sequencing analyses. RL conducted all Western blots. AM completed the analyses derived from the Human Pan-GI Cell Atlas. LR performed the FXR agonist platelet activation studies. KK performed queries in UK Biobank and All of Us. AS conducted all NMR analyses. EF performed all bile acid quantifications and analyses. MDR, KB, AW, KC, FDB, and GDW oversaw the above experiments, provided reagents, and edited the manuscript. GAF supervised the project, acquired funding, and edited the manuscript. ER generated the chronic NSAID dosing model, supervised the project, acquired funding, and edited the manuscript.

Funding support

This work is the result of NIH funding, in part, and is subject to the NIH Public Access Policy. Through acceptance of this federal funding, the NIH has been given a right to make the work publicly available in PubMed Central.

  • NIH grant U54TR001878 to GAF.
  • PhRMA Research Starter Grant in Translational Medicine and Therapeutics to ER.
  • Merit Award from the American Heart Association to GAF.
  • Microbial Culture and Metabolomics Core of the Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases (NIH P30DK050306) for bile acid work to GDW.
  • Abramson Cancer Center Support grant NIH P30 CA016520 to CAA.
  • NIH grant F31 HG013246 to KK.
  • NIH grant R01-DK-134575 to MDR.
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Unedited blot and gel images

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Ian Henrich and Elizabeth Hennessy for assistance with editing as well as Soon Yew Tang, Katherine Theken, Tilo Grosser, Christoph Thaiss, Michael Silverman, Chris Lengner, Harvey Herschman, Jia Nong, and Enrico Radaelli for reagents and technical support. We would also like to acknowledge the Penn Vet Comparative Pathology Core (RRID:SCR_022438) and the Microbial Culture and Metabolomics Core of the Penn CHOP Microbiome Program and the Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases for their assistance with specialized readouts. The UK Biobank research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 32133. This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the National Health Service as part of their care and support. We gratefully acknowledge All of Us participants for their contributions, without whom this research would not have been possible. We also thank the NIH’s All of Us Research Program for making available the participant data examined in this study.

Address correspondence to: Garret A. FitzGerald or Emanuela Ricciotti, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, Room 10-122, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Phone: 1.215.898.1185; Email: garret@upenn.edu (GAF). Phone: 1.215.898.9391; Email: emanuela@pennmedicine.upenn.edu (ER).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: GW receives research funding from Intercept Pharmaceuticals.

Copyright: © 2026, Barekat et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2026;136(6):e190575. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190575.

References
  1. Bhala N, et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2013;382(9894):769–779.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Paakkari H. Epidemiological and financial aspects of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1994;75(suppl 2):56–59.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Bjarnason I, et al. Mechanisms of damage to the gastrointestinal tract from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(3):500–514.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Grosser T, et al. The cardiovascular pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38(8):733–748.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Lanas A, Sopeña F. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and lower gastrointestinal complications. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2009;38(2):333–352.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. García-Rayado G, et al. NSAID induced gastrointestinal damage and designing GI-sparing NSAIDs. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018;11(10):1031–1043.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Martin JH, et al. Is cytochrome P450 2C9 genotype associated with NSAID gastric ulceration? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51(6):627–630.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Vonkeman HE, et al. Allele variants of the cytochrome P450 2C9 genotype in white subjects from The Netherlands with serious gastroduodenal ulcers attributable to the use of NSAIDs. Clin Ther. 2006;28(10):1670–1676.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Ivey KJ. Mechanisms of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric damage. Actions of therapeutic agents. Am J Med. 1988;84(2a):41–48.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Overholt BF, Pollard HM. Acetylsalicylic acid and ionic fluxes across the gastric mucosa of man. Gastroenterology. 1968;54(4):538–542.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Smith BM, et al. Permeability of the human gastric mucosa. Alteration by acetylsalicylic acid and ethanol. N Engl J Med. 1971;285(13):716–721.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Ivey KJ, et al. Effect of salicylates on the gastric mucosal barrier in man. J Appl Physiol. 1972;33(1):81–85.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Rees WD, et al. The role of histamine receptors in the pathophysiology of gastric mucosal damage. Gastroenterology. 1977;72(1):67–71.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Kauffman GL Jr. Prostaglandin and cimetidine inhibit the formation of ulcers produced by parenteral salicylates. Gastroenterology. 1978;75(6):1099–1102.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Daneshmend TK, et al. Abolition by omeprazole of aspirin induced gastric mucosal injury in man. Gut. 1990;31(5):514–517.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Yeomans ND, et al. A comparison of omeprazole with ranitidine for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Acid Suppression Trial: Ranitidine versus Omeprazole for NSAID-associated Ulcer Treatment (ASTRONAUT) Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(11):719–726.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Wallace JL. NSAID gastropathy and enteropathy: distinct pathogenesis likely necessitates distinct prevention strategies. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(1):67–74.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin-like drugs. Nat New Biol. 1971;231(25):232–235.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(5):986–1000.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Smith WL, Dewitt DL. Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases-1 and -2. Adv Immunol. 1996;62:167–215.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Jackson BA, et al. Effects of transforming growth factor beta and interleukin-1 beta on expression of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 and phospholipase A2 mRNA in lung fibroblasts and endothelial cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;197(3):1465–1474.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Smith CJ, et al. Differentiation of monocytoid THP-1 cells with phorbol ester induces expression of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-1 (COX-1). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;192(2):787–793.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Brannon TS, et al. Prostacyclin synthesis in ovine pulmonary artery is developmentally regulated by changes in cyclooxygenase-1 gene expression. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(5):2230–2235.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Samet JM, et al. Selective induction of prostaglandin G/H synthase I by stem cell factor and dexamethasone in mast cells. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(14):8044–8049.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Yamagata K, et al. Expression of a mitogen-inducible cyclooxygenase in brain neurons: regulation by synaptic activity and glucocorticoids. Neuron. 1993;11(2):371–386.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Harris RC, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with the macula densa of rat kidney and increases with salt restriction. J Clin Invest. 1994;94(6):2504–2510.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Walenga RW, et al. Constitutive expression of prostaglandin endoperoxide G/H synthetase (PGHS)-2 but not PGHS-1 in human tracheal epithelial cells in vitro. Prostaglandins. 1996;52(5):341–359.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Zimmermann KC, et al. Constitutive cyclooxygenase-2 expression in healthy human and rabbit gastric mucosa. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54(3):536–540.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. MacNaughton WK, Cushing K. Role of constitutive cyclooxygenase-2 in prostaglandin-dependent secretion in mouse colon in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;293(2):539–544.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Whittle BJ. Temporal relationship between cyclooxygenase inhibition, as measured by prostacyclin biosynthesis, and the gastrointestinal damage induced by indomethacin in the rat. Gastroenterology. 1981;80(1):94–98.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Moncada S, et al. An enzyme isolated from arteries transforms prostaglandin endoperoxides to an unstable substance that inhibits platelet aggregation. Nature. 1976;263(5579):663–665.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Tanaka A, et al. Role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 inhibition in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced intestinal damage in rats: relation to various pathogenic events. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;303(3):1248–1254.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Sigthorsson G, et al. COX-1 and 2, intestinal integrity, and pathogenesis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy in mice. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(7):1913–1923.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Tanaka A, et al. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 by inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1: a key to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced intestinal damage. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300(3):754–761.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Hotz-Behofsits C, et al. Role of COX-2 in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy in rodents. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(7-8):822–827.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Wallace JL, Devchand PR. Emerging roles for cyclooxygenase-2 in gastrointestinal mucosal defense. Br J Pharmacol. 2005;145(3):275–282.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Reuter BK, et al. Exacerbation of inflammation-associated colonic injury in rat through inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. J Clin Invest. 1996;98(9):2076–2085.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Mizuno H, et al. Induction of cyclooxygenase 2 in gastric mucosal lesions and its inhibition by the specific antagonist delays healing in mice. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(2):387–397.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Masferrer JL, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: a new class of anti-inflammatory agents that spare the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1996;25(2):363–372.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Morham SG, et al. Prostaglandin synthase 2 gene disruption causes severe renal pathology in the mouse. Cell. 1995;83(3):473–482.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Dinchuk JE, et al. Renal abnormalities and an altered inflammatory response in mice lacking cyclooxygenase II. Nature. 1995;378(6555):406–409.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Seibert K, et al. Pharmacological and biochemical demonstration of the role of cyclooxygenase 2 in inflammation and pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(25):12013–12017.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Bombardier C, et al. Comparison of uppergastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(21):1520–1528.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Silverstein FE, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. JAMA. 2000;284(10):1247–1255.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Iñiguez MA, et al. Detection of COX-1 and COX-2 isoforms in synovial fluid cells from inflammatory joint diseases. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(7):773–778.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Lichtenberger LM, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) associate with zwitterionic phospholipids: insight into the mechanism and reversal of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal injury. Nat Med. 1995;1(2):154–158.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Lichtenberger LM, et al. NSAID injury to the gastrointestinal tract: evidence that NSAIDs interact with phospholipids to weaken the hydrophobic surface barrier and induce the formation of unstable pores in membranes. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2006;58(11):1421–1428.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Manrique-Moreno M, et al. The membrane-activity of Ibuprofen, Diclofenac, and Naproxen: a physico-chemical study with lecithin phospholipids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788(6):1296–1303.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Somasundaram S, et al. Mitochondrial damage: a possible mechanism of the “topical” phase of NSAID induced injury to the rat intestine. Gut. 1997;41(3):344–353.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Somasundaram S, et al. Uncoupling of intestinal mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and inhibition of cyclooxygenase are required for the development of NSAID-enteropathy in the rat. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(5):639–650.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Kent TH, et al. Small intestinal ulcers and intestinal flora in rats given indomethacin. Am J Pathol. 1969;54(2):237–249.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Robert A, Asano T. Resistance of germfree rats to indomethacin-induced intestinal lesions. Prostaglandins. 1977;14(2):333–341.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Hagiwara M, et al. Role of unbalanced growth of gram-negative bacteria in ileal ulcer formation in rats treated with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. J Med Invest. 2004;51(1-2):43–51.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Wallace JL, et al. Proton pump inhibitors exacerbate NSAID-induced small intestinal injury by inducing dysbiosis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(4):1314–1322.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Liang X, et al. Bidirectional interactions between indomethacin and the murine intestinal microbiota. Elife. 2015;4:e08973.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Uejima M, et al. Role of intestinal bacteria in ileal ulcer formation in rats treated with a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug. Microbiol Immunol. 1996;40(8):553–560.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Maseda D, Ricciotti E. NSAID-gut microbiota interactions. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1153.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Reuter BK, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy in rats: role of permeability, bacteria, and enterohepatic circulation. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(1):109–117.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Zhou Y, et al. Effect of indomethacin on bile acid-phospholipid interactions: implication for small intestinal injury induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298(5):G722–G731.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Saitta KS, et al. Bacterial β-glucuronidase inhibition protects mice against enteropathy induced by indomethacin, ketoprofen or diclofenac: mode of action and pharmacokinetics. Xenobiotica. 2014;44(1):28–35.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Reese J, et al. Coordinated regulation of fetal and maternal prostaglandins directs successful birth and postnatal adaptation in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(17):9759–9764.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Stanfield KM, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in embryonic and fetal tissues during organogenesis and late pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003;67(1):54–58.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Rugstad HE, et al. Piroxicam and naproxen plasma concentrations in patients with osteoarthritis: relation to age, sex, efficacy and adverse events. Clin Rheumatol. 1986;5(3):389–398.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Nair AB, Jacob S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016;7(2):27–31.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Gika HG, et al. Determination of two COX-2 inhibitors in serum and synovial fluid of patients with inflammatory arthritis by ultra performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2009;49(3):579–586.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Lemmens G, et al. Insight into the colonic disposition of celecoxib in humans. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;145:105242.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Fournel S, Caldwell J. The metabolic chiral inversion of 2-phenylpropionic acid in rat, mouse and rabbit. Biochem Pharmacol. 1986;35(23):4153–4159.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Kinouchi T, et al. Culture supernatants of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium adolescentis repress ileal ulcer formation in rats treated with a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug by suppressing unbalanced growth of aerobic bacteria and lipid peroxidation. Microbiol Immunol. 1998;42(5):347–355.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Koga H, et al. Experimental enteropathy in athymic and euthymic rats: synergistic role of lipopolysaccharide and indomethacin. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(3):G576–G582.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  70. Syer SD, et al. NSAID enteropathy and bacteria: a complicated relationship. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(4):387–393.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. LoGuidice A, et al. Pharmacologic targeting of bacterial β-glucuronidase alleviates nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;341(2):447–454.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Hofmann AF. The continuing importance of bile acids in liver and intestinal disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(22):2647–2658.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Song Z, et al. Taxonomic profiling and populational patterns of bacterial bile salt hydrolase (BSH) genes based on worldwide human gut microbiome. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):9.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Ojeda ML, et al. Microbiota-liver-bile salts axis, a novel mechanism involved in the contrasting effects of sodium selenite and selenium-nanoparticle supplementation on adipose tissue development in adolescent rats. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(5):1123.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Chen S, et al. High temperature and humidity in the environment disrupt bile acid metabolism, the gut microbiome, and GLP-1 secretion in mice. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):465.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Bycroft C, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562(7726):203–209.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. The All of Us Research Program Investigators, et al. The “All of Us” research program. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):668–676.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Fiorucci S, et al. Activation of the farnesoid-X receptor protects against gastrointestinal injury caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(8):1929–1938.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Jones BV, et al. Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(36):13580–13585.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Chillingworth NL, et al. Sex differences in inflammation and inflammatory pain in cyclooxygenase-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;291(2):R327–R334.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Craft RM, et al. Antinociception produced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in female vs male rats. Behav Pharmacol. 2021;32(2&3):153–169.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Solomon DH, et al. Differences in safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in patients with osteoarthritis and patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(4):537–546.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Collantes E, et al. A multinational randomized, controlled, clinical trial of etoricoxib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis [ISRCTN25142273]. BMC Fam Pract. 2002;3:10.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Nissen SE, et al. Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, naproxen, or ibuprofen for arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(26):2519–2529.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Lee SP, et al. Effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on small intestinal injuries as evaluated by capsule endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(8):2724–2731.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Maiden L, et al. A quantitative analysis of NSAID-induced small bowel pathology by capsule enteroscopy. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(5):1172–1178.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Goldstein JL, et al. Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3(2):133–141.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Edogawa S, et al. Sex differences in NSAID-induced perturbation of human intestinal barrier function and microbiota. FASEB J. 2018;32(12):fj201800560R.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. Mitchell JA, et al. Cell-specific gene deletion reveals the antithrombotic function of COX1 and explains the vascular COX1/prostacyclin paradox. Circ Res. 2019;125(9):847–854.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Yu Z, et al. Disruption of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway attenuates atherogenesis consequent to COX-2 deletion in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(17):6727–6732.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  91. Song WL, et al. Noninvasive assessment of the role of cyclooxygenases in cardiovascular health: a detailed HPLC/MS/MS method. Methods Enzymol. 2007;433:51–72.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Bolyen E, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):852–857.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. Callahan BJ, et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–583.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  94. Quast C, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(database issue):590–596.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  95. Bokulich NA, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):90.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  96. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–780.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  97. Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(12):8228–8235.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  98. Lozupone CA, et al. Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(5):1576–1585.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  99. Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001;26(1):32–46.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  100. Friedman ES, et al. FXR-dependent modulation of the human small intestinal microbiome by the bile acid derivative obeticholic acid. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(6):1741–1752.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  101. Wang S, et al. Diet-induced remission in chronic enteropathy is associated with altered microbial community structure and synthesis of secondary bile acids. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):126.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (January 27, 2026): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (March 16, 2026): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts