BACKGROUND Naive cells comprise 90% of the CD4+ T cell population in neonates and exhibit distinct age-specific capacities for proliferation and activation. We hypothesized that HIV-infected naive CD4+ T cell populations in children on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) would thus be distinct from infected memory cells.METHODS Peripheral blood naive and memory CD4+ T cells from 8 children with perinatal HIV on ART initiated at age 1.7–17 months were isolated by FACS. DNA was extracted from sorted cells, and HIV proviruses were counted, evaluated for intactness, and subjected to integration site analysis (ISA).RESULTS Naive CD4+ T cells containing HIV proviruses were detected in children with 95% statistical confidence. A median 4.7% of long terminal repeat–containing naive CD4+ T cells also contained HIV genetic elements consistent with intactness. Full-length proviral sequencing confirmed intactness of 1 provirus. In the participant with the greatest degree of naive cell infection, ISA revealed infected expanded cell clones in both naive and memory T cells, with no common HIV integration sites detected between subsets. Divergent integration site profiles reflected differential gene expression patterns of naive and memory T cells.CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that HIV persisted in both naive and memory CD4+ T cells that underwent clonal expansion and harbored intact proviruses, and suggest that infected memory T cell clones do not frequently arise from naive cell differentiation in children with perinatal HIV on long-term ART.FUNDING Center for Cancer Research, NCI; Office of AIDS Research; NCI FLEX; Children’s and Emory Junior Faculty Focused Award.
Mary Grace Katusiime, Victoria Neer, Shuang Guo, Sean C. Patro, Wenjie Wang, Brian Luke, Adam A. Capoferri, Xiaolin Wu, Anna M. Horner, Jason W. Rausch, Ann Chahroudi, Maud Mavigner, Mary F. Kearney
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,509 | 198 |
| 390 | 43 | |
| Figure | 530 | 0 |
| Table | 195 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 349 | 10 |
| Citation downloads | 160 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,133 | 251 |
| Total Views | 3,384 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.