Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(12):e186591. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI186591.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microglia-mediated brain immune changes play a role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but imaging microglia in living people with PD has relied on positron emission tomography (PET) ligands that lack specificity in labeling immune cells in the nervous system. We aimed to develop imaging of colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) as a microglial-sensitive marker of innate immunity.METHODS IHC using a CSF1R antibody evaluated colocalization with Iba-1 in PD (n = 4) and control (n = 4) human brain samples. Autoradiography using a CSF1R tritiated ligand in human brain samples from individuals with PD (n = 5) and in a control group (n = 4) was performed to obtain Bmax. PET imaging using a CSF1R radioligand was performed in 10 controls and 12 people with PD, and VT was compared between groups and correlated with disease severity.RESULTS IHC of CSF1R in human brain samples shows colocalization with Iba-1 and is significantly increased in brain samples from individuals with PD compared with individuals in a control group. Autoradiography revealed significantly increased CSF1R ligand binding in the inferior parietal cortex of patients with PD. [11C]CPPC PET showed higher binding in people with moderate PD compared with people in a control group and ligand binding correlated with more severe motor disability and poorer verbal fluency.CONCLUSION This study underscores the significance of CSF1R imaging as a promising biomarker for brain immune function in Parkinson’s disease, which may be associated with cognitive and motor disease severity.FUNDING PET imaging: the Michael J. Fox Foundation and the RMS Family Foundation. Radiotracer development: NIH (R01AG066464 and P41 EB024495). Postmortem brain tissues: NIH P30 AG066507 and BIOCARD study NIH U19 AG033655.
Authors
Kelly A. Mills, Yong Du, Jennifer M. Coughlin, Catherine A. Foss, Andrew G. Horti, Katelyn R. Jenkins, Yana Skorobogatova, Ergi Spiro, Chelsie S. Motley, Robert F. Dannals, Wojciech G. Lesniak, Jae-Jin Song, Yu Ree Choi, Javier Redding-Ochoa, Juan C. Troncoso, Valina L. Dawson, Tae-In Kam, Martin G. Pomper, Ted M. Dawson
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through November 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,864 | 133 |
| 466 | 25 | |
| Figure | 367 | 0 |
| Table | 155 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 515 | 11 |
| Citation downloads | 115 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,482 | 169 |
| Total Views | 3,651 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)