Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research ArticleCell biologyGeneticsVascular biology Open Access | 10.1172/JCI186287

CDKL1 variants affecting ciliary formation predispose to thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection

Theresa Nauth,1 Melanie Philipp,2 Sina Renner,1 Martin D. Burkhalter,2 Helke Schüler,3 Ceren Saygi,4 Kristian Händler,5 Bente Siebels,6 Alice Busch,1 Thomas Mair,6 Verena Rickassel,1 Sophia Deden,1 Konstantin Hoffer,7,8 Jakob Olfe,9 Thomas S. Mir,9 Yskert von Kodolitsch,3 Evaldas Girdauskas,10 Meike Rybczynski,3 Malte Kriegs,7,8 Hannah Voß,6 Thomas Sauvigny,11 Malte Spielmann,5,12,13 Malik Alawi,4 Susanne Krasemann,14,15 Christian Kubisch,1 Till J. Demal,10 and Georg Rosenberger1

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Nauth, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Philipp, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Renner, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Burkhalter, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Schüler, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Saygi, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Händler, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Siebels, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Busch, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Mair, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Rickassel, V. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Deden, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Hoffer, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Olfe, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Mir, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by von Kodolitsch, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Girdauskas, E. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Rybczynski, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Kriegs, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Voß, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Sauvigny, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Spielmann, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Alawi, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Krasemann, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Kubisch, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Demal, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

2Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Section of Pharmacogenomics, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

3Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

4Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

5Institute of Human Genetics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), University of Lübeck and University of Kiel, Lübeck, Germany.

6Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Diagnostics;

7University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; and

8Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum–UCCH; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

9Clinic for Children’s Heart Medicine and Adult Congenital Heart Disease and

10Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

11Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

12Human Molecular Genetics Group, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

13DZHK e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

14Institute of Neuropathology and

15Core Facility for Experimental Histo-Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Find articles by Rosenberger, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Authorship note: TN and MP are co–first authors.

Published October 7, 2025 - More info

Published in Volume 135, Issue 23 on December 1, 2025
J Clin Invest. 2025;135(23):e186287. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI186287.
© 2025 Nauth et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published October 7, 2025 - Version history
Received: August 23, 2024; Accepted: September 30, 2025
View PDF
Abstract

Genetic factors are fundamental in the etiology of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD), but the genetic cause is detected in only about 30% of cases. To define unreported TAAD-associated sequence variants, exome and gene panel sequencing was performed in 323 patients. We identified heterozygous CDKL1 variants [c.427T>C p.(Cys143Arg), c.617C>T p.(Ser206Leu), and c.404C>T p.(Thr135Met)] in 6 patients from 3 families with TAAD spectrum disorders. CDKL1 encodes a protein kinase involved in ciliary biology. Amino acid substitutions were predicted to affect CDKL1 catalytic activity or protein binding properties. CDKL1 was expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells in normal and diseased human aortic wall tissue. Cdkl1 knockdown and transient knockout in zebrafish resulted in intersomitic vessel (ISV) malformations and aortic dilation. Coinjection of human CDKL1wild-type RNA, but not CDKL1Cys143Arg and CDKL1Ser206Leu RNA, rescued ISV malformations. All variants affected CDKL1 kinase function and profiling data, and altered protein-protein binding properties, particularly with ciliary transport molecules. Expression of CDKL1 variants in heterologous cells interfered with cilia formation and length, CDKL1 localization, and p38 MAPK and Vegf signaling. Our data suggest a role of CDKL1 variants in the pathogenesis of TAAD spectrum disorders. The association between primary cilia dysregulation and TAAD expands our knowledge of the underlying molecular pathophysiology.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (TAAD) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries (1–3). TAAD is divided into non-syndromic forms and syndromic forms such as Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Patients with syndromic forms present with anomalies within various organ systems including integumental, musculoskeletal, ocular, craniofacial, and/or non-aortic vascular manifestations (2, 4). In a larger context, diseases with TAAD can be counted among the extensive group of connective tissue disorders (CTDs) (5). From an etiological point of view, TAAD is a heterogeneous disease with a high proportion of genetic predisposition (1, 2, 6). Accordingly, a positive family history is a substantial risk factor for TAAD (2). More than 40 genes with differing strength of association with hereditary TAAD (HTAAD) have been described (1, 4, 7). However, definitively disease-causing variants in these genes are only found in less than 30% of patients (2, 4), which suggests further genetic heterogeneity (4). As a genetic diagnosis is getting increasingly important for gene-tailored, personalized patient management, further disease genes have to be identified.

Most known genes implicated in HTAAD encode proteins acting in 3 cellular mechanisms: (a) extracellular matrix (ECM) assembly, maintenance, and homeostasis (including collagen metabolism); (b) transforming growth factor-β (TGFB) signaling; and (c) vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) function (1–3). To give some details, fibrillins and collagens (e.g., FBN1, COL3A1) are structural ECM components; enzymes such as LOX and PLOD1 are involved in processing of structural ECM molecules; TGFB receptors and SMAD proteins (e.g., TGFBR1, SMAD3) mediate or affect TGFB signaling and VSMC phenotype; and MYH11, ACTA2, MYLK, and PRKG1 are regulators of VSMC contractility (1, 2, 4). Few HTAAD genes are associated with miscellaneous cellular mechanisms such as cell-cell adhesion or transcriptional regulation (1, 3, 4). To identify additional susceptibility genes for TAAD, we performed exome sequencing in a family with TAAD. We validated our priority candidate genes by genetic analyses in a cohort of 320 individuals with TAAD spectrum disorders/hereditary CTDs, by computer-aided in silico analysis, and by extensive functional characterization of candidate variants.

Results

Identification of heterozygous CDKL1 missense variants in patients with TAAD spectrum disorders. We performed exome sequencing in 3 affected individuals of family 1 (Figure 1A). The male index patient (patient P1) had a severe and complex aortic disease, which affected the entire length of the organ. Initially, he presented at an external hospital with a type B aortic dissection, which was treated by a replacement of the abdominal aorta and iliac artery replacement using a Y-graft, with reimplantation of the renal and visceral arteries at the age of 45 years. Subsequently, due to a thoracic aortic aneurysm of the descending aorta, a thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the distal aortic arch as well as the descending aorta was performed at our center at the same year. Thereafter, a type A dissection occurred, which necessitated the replacement of the aortic root (Bentall procedure) and the proximal arch, also within the same year. Due to graft infections and an endoleak, several further open and endovascular aortic procedures were necessary afterward. In addition to the aortic disease, a physical examination at the age of 52 years revealed hypertelorism, a high-arched palate, flat feet (pes planus), and severe myopia. His brother (patient P2) had a type B aortic dissection at the age of 52 years, which was treated by endovascular aortic repair. An anterior spinal artery syndrome led to a spinal cord injury. At the age of 53 years, carotid artery dissections on both sides on the basis of carotidal aneurysms and basal ganglia hemorrhage occurred. The index patient’s niece (patient P3) presented at the age of 22 with scoliosis, positive wrist and thumb sign, planovalgus deformity of both feet, myopia, greater than 90° extension of the fifth digit, borderline dilated pulmonary artery, and a marfanoid habitus. The aorta showed normal diameters and was not affected by dissections. Table 1 summarizes the clinical manifestations. Family history indicated that an older brother of the index patient died due to an aortic event (TAAD) at the age of 39 years. None of the 3 affected family members showed sequence variants with allele frequencies (AFs) ≤0.05 in disease and candidate disease genes for vascular/connective tissue disorders (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI186287DS1). Moreover, they did not share putatively disease-relevant copy number variations, and genome sequencing in patient P1 did not reveal any rare intronic FBN1 variants predicted to affect splicing (Supplemental Data: Results). Filtering of exome data, variant prioritization, and genotyping in the unaffected brother (Figure 1A, U1) of the index patient resulted in a list of 11 putative candidate alleles present in a heterozygous form in all 3 affected family members (Table 2). Further variant prioritization including pathogenicity predictions, allele frequencies, and functional considerations supported the heterozygous missense variant CDKL1 c.427T>C p.(Cys143Arg) as the most promising candidate allele (Table 2): First, CDKL1 (cyclin-dependent kinase–like 1) belongs to a family of CDKL kinases encompassing homologs CDKL1, CDKL2, CDKL3, CDKL4, and CDKL5 (8). Little is known about CDKL function, except for CDKL5 that is encoded by the disease gene for a form of epileptic encephalopathy (developmental and epileptic encephalopathy-2 [DEE2], MIM #300672). Pathogenic variants affecting CDKL5 amino acid 152 (p.Cys152Arg, p.Cys152Phe, p.Cys152Tyr), which is homologous to Cys143 in CDKL1, have been reported previously (9–13). Second, allele count of CDKL1 c.427T>C is 0 in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) v2.1.1 (Table 2) (14). Third, CDKL1 p.(Cys143Arg) was predicted to be damaging by 5 in silico pathogenicity prediction tools (Table 2), and CDKL1 Cys143 was determined to be crucial for ATP binding by the use of structural bioinformatics approaches (15).

Family pedigrees.Figure 1

Family pedigrees. The respective identified CDKL1 variant and current age (in years) is given. (A) Family 1. Patients P1, P2, and P3 with a TAAD spectrum disorder were used for the identification of CDKL1 as candidate disease gene. U1, unaffected brother of the index. (B) Family 2. Patients P4 and P5 with Marfan syndrome–like features. (C) Family 3. Patient P6 with aortic dissection.

Table 1

Patients, clinical characteristics, and CDKL1 variants identified in this study

Table 2

Candidate disease alleles

Gene panel sequencing identified 2 further CDKL1 variants in a cohort of 320 consecutive, unrelated individuals with TAAD spectrum or connective tissue disorders: The heterozygous missense variant CDKL1 c.617C>T p.(Ser206Leu) was detected in patient P4 (family 2, Figure 1B), a woman with Marfan syndrome–like features including positive wrist and thumb signs, dural ectasia, pectus excavatum, and joint hyperflexibility (knees and elbows) as first reported at the age of 37 years and confirmed in her most recent clinical examination at the age of 51 years (Table 1). Her brother, patient P5 (Figure 1B), also carries the CDKL1 c.617C>T variant and presented with scoliosis, positive thumb sign, greater than 90° extension of the fifth digit, reduced upper segment/lower segment ratio, increased arm/height ratio (dolichostenomelia), and dural ectasia at the age of 23 years and at his most recent clinical examination at the age of 34 years. According to medical history, the mother and the grandfather of the siblings died of an aortic dissection and sudden cardiac death, respectively (Figure 1B). We did not identify variants with AF ≤0.05 in disease and candidate disease genes for vascular/connective tissue disorders (Supplemental Table 1). The siblings did not share potentially pathogenic copy number variations, and genome sequencing in patient P5 did not reveal any rare intronic FBN1 variants predicted to affect splicing (Supplemental Data: Results). The AF of CDKL1 c.617C>T p.(Ser206Leu) is 0.00001831 in gnomAD (v2.1.1) controls, 0.00004576 for non-Finnish Europeans (NFEs) in gnomAD (v4.1.0), and 0.00003656 in gnomAD (v4.1.0) total dataset (Table 2). CDKL1 p.(Ser206Leu) is predicted to be deleterious by all 5 tested pathogenicity classifiers (Table 2). Moreover, DEE2-causing serine-to-arginine change of CDKL5 amino acid 215, which is homologous to CDKL1 Ser206, caused a marked reduction in CDKL5 kinase activity in cell-based studies (16). Segregation analysis was not possible because DNA samples from further family members were not available.

Patient P6 (family 3, Figure 1C), a 57-year-old woman, presented with an acute type A aortic dissection from the aortic root to the iliac bifurcation at the age of 52. The brachiocephalic trunk originated from the true lumen; the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery were both also affected by the dissection. She was treated with a replacement of the ascending aorta and the proximal aortic arch as well as the aortic valve using a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. The most recent clinical examination at the age of 52 years did not show any relevant musculoskeletal features, other than pes planus (Table 1). Her family history was negative for aortic disease. Gene panel sequencing revealed the heterozygous missense variant CDKL1 c.404C>T, which has an AF of 0.00004570 in gnomAD (v2.1.1) controls, 0.00009407 for NFEs in gnomAD (v4.1.0), and 0.00007930 in gnomAD (v4.1.0) total dataset (Table 2). CDKL1 p.(Thr135Met) is predicted to be deleterious by 4 of 5 tested pathogenicity classifiers (Table 2). In addition, we identified 2 heterozygous variants in OMIM disease genes in patient P6: MYLK c.3064C>A p.(Pro1022Thr) and FLNC c.449A>G p.(Asp150Gly), which were classified as variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and likely benign variant (LBV), respectively (Table 2) (17). MYLK c.3064C>A p.(Pro1022Thr) is listed neither in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database (dbSNP) and gnomAD database (v2.1.1), nor in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) (18), and all pathogenicity scores tested were below their respective thresholds (Table 2). Heterozygous pathogenic variants in MYLK cause autosomal dominant aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 7 (MIM #613780). The overwhelming majority of aortopathy-associated MYLK variants are frameshift, nonsense, or splice site alterations (ClinVar, HGMD) (18, 19), whereas the significance of MYLK missense variants for the manifestation of TAAD is unsolved (20, 21). Heterozygous pathogenic FLNC variants cause several forms of (cardio)myopathies (MIM #617047, #614065, #609524), none of which are consistent with the clinical manifestations in patient P6. FLNC c.449A>G p.(Asp150Gly) has an AF of 0.00003672 in gnomAD (v2.1.1) controls (Table 2), and it is listed in ClinVar and HGMD as VUS and likely disease-causing, respectively, for (cardio)myopathies (22, 23). Only 2 of 5 pathogenicity scores calculated for FLNC c.449A>G p.(Asp150Gly) were above the respective thresholds (Table 2). Parental DNA samples for segregation analysis were not available. Taken together, available data do not rule out a role for MYLK c.3064C>A and do not support a role for FLNC c.449A>G in the clinical manifestation of patient P6.

In summary, we identified 3 different CDKL1 variants in 6 individuals from 3 families with clinical presentations suggestive of CTDs with aortic/arterial manifestations. The mean age of the patients at first clinical manifestation was 38.5 ± 12.4 years with an even female to male ratio. Four of six patients presented with vascular manifestations, and all but one (patient P2) showed skeletal features.

Molecular modeling and conservation analysis. Figure 2A shows the spatial position of affected CDKL1 amino acids Cys143, Ser206, and Thr135 in relation to conserved protein motifs, secondary structure elements, and protein surface. These amino acids are conserved (Figure 2B). Cys143 is the first amino acid of the highly conserved activation loop and borders the invariant DFG motif that is important for Mg2+ binding and protein catalysis (Figure 2, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 1). Molecular replacement of Cys143 with an arginine is predicted to result in loss of one van der Waals contact with the phosphate donor ATP and changes of more than 25 intramolecular interactions (Figure 2C and Supplemental Figure 2). We conclude that p.Cys143Arg may interfere with ATP phosphate positioning and/or protein catalysis. Ser206 is within the GKSDVD motif that is implicated in regulator/substrate binding (Figure 2, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 1). Replacement of the uncharged, polar, hydrophilic Ser206 by an uncharged, nonpolar, hydrophobic leucine is predicted to reverse surface hydrophobicity (Figure 2C and Supplemental Figure 3) that is crucial for protein folding and binding properties. Thus, the CDKL1 p.Ser206Leu alteration may affect interactions with yet undescribed regulators/substrates. Thr135 localizes in the Mg2+ binding loop and borders the serine/threonine protein kinases active-site signature, which suggests a structural function in positioning of Mg2+ and ATP (Figure 2A and Supplemental Figure 1). Molecular replacement of Thr135 is predicted to result in loss of more than 10 intramolecular interactions, including the one with Cys83 that is involved in ATP positioning and protein catalysis (Figure 2C and Supplemental Figures 1 and 4). Thus, p.Thr135Met possibly affects the catalytic activity of the kinase. In summary, structural and physicochemical in silico calculations suggest adverse effects on specific protein features for all identified CDKL1 variants. Detailed information on molecular modeling and on general kinase biology, including citations of relevant literature, is outlined in Supplemental Results, Supplemental Methods, and Supplemental Figures 1–4.

Structural and physicochemical impact of CDKL1 amino acid changes.Figure 2

Structural and physicochemical impact of CDKL1 amino acid changes. (A) Molecular position of CDKL1 amino acids Cys143, Ser206, and Thr135 in relation to conserved sequence motifs and accessible surfaces. CDKL1 amino acids 1–303 are shown (AlphaFold AF-Q00532-F1-model_v4; AlphaFill AF-Q00532-F1-model_v1). Different colors in the ribbon representation (left model) and on the protein surface (right model) indicate conserved sequence motifs in the protein kinase domain of CDKL1 (amino acids 5–288). Secondary structure elements including β4, β6, and β7 strands as well as αC, αE, αF, and αG helices are indicated. (B) Conservation of CDKL1. Conservation was determined between 150 sequences among various species and visualized using the ConSurf server. Conserved amino acids are highlighted in maroon and variable residues in cyan. Cys143, Ser206, and Thr135 are marked with arrowheads. (C) Structural or physicochemical consequences of CDKL1 amino acid changes. Ribbon representations show spatial positions of CDKL1 wild-type amino acids Cys143 and Thr135 (top models) and exchanged amino acids Arg143 and Met135 (bottom models) as well as neighboring amino acids and phosphate donor ATP (all as sticks). Van der Waals (VDW) overlaps ≥0.4 Å (i.e., contacts) are shown as green lines; VDW overlaps ≥0.6 Å (i.e., clashes) are indicated by magenta lines. Side chains are colored by element (hydrogen: white; carbon: gray; oxygen: red; nitrogen: blue; sulfur: yellow; phosphorus: orange). In the ribbon representations for the p.Thr135Met change, amino acids involved in ATP positioning and protein catalysis are indicated by dark blue and light blue, respectively. Protein surface models show surface hydrophobicity of wild-type amino acid Ser206 (top model) and replaced amino acid Leu206 (bottom model), both within the putative Gly-Lys-Ser-Asp-Val-Asp protein binding motif. The color code ranges from cyan for the most hydrophilic residues to tan for the most hydrophobic residues. Comprehensive models are shown in Supplemental Figures 2–4.

CDKL1 is expressed in VSMCs within aortic wall tissue. Immunohistological staining of tissue sections suggested CDKL1 expression in epithelial and endothelial cells, adipocytes, and melanocytes and in the walls of blood vessels of various tissues (Supplemental Figure 5) (24); however, no expression data were generated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for larger vessels. We visualized CDKL1 in aortic tissue from 3 individuals with ascending aortic aneurysms and 2 control individuals (Figure 3A and Supplemental Figure 6, A and B). Clinical details regarding these patients and controls are given in Supplemental Methods. Staining of ACTA2 and CD31, marker proteins for smooth muscle cells and vascular endothelial cells, respectively, in consecutive sections suggested that CDKL1 is expressed weakly to moderately in VSMCs of the aortic media and moderately in the smooth muscle layer of small blood vessels, the vasa vasorum (Figure 3A and Supplemental Figure 6, A and B). Certain cells and cell layers showed stronger CDKL1 expression in both tissue areas (arrows in Figure 3A and in Supplemental Figure 6, A and B). Validation of CDKL1 antibodies is shown in Supplemental Figure 7.

CDKL1 is expressed in VSMCs of normal and diseased aortic tissue.Figure 3

CDKL1 is expressed in VSMCs of normal and diseased aortic tissue. (A) Immunohistological analysis of CDKL1 expression in aortic wall tissue. Consecutive sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human aorta tissue from a control individual (control 1) and 2 patients with aortic aneurysms (aneurysm 1 and aneurysm 2) were immunostained for VSMC marker protein ACTA2 (smooth muscle actin), CDKL1 (antibody 1 [AB1; see Supplemental Data: Results]; 1:300), and the vascular endothelial marker CD31 using specific primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase–conjugated (brown) secondary antibodies. Specimens were counterstained with hematoxylin (nuclei, blue). Representative pictures are shown. Note that CDKL1 is colocalizing with ACTA2-positive cells. Arrows indicate cells with stronger CDKL1 expression. Vv, vasa vasorum. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Reanalysis of combined publicly available human aortic single-cell RNA-Seq datasets (28, 29). Filtered and annotated data were merged and integrated using Harmony. Top left panel: Feature plot of CDKL1 expression in combined dataset. Each cell in the dataset is represented by a dot in the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) space. Cells with a CDKL1 expression above 0 are colored in blue; cells with no detected expression of CDKL1 are colored in yellow. Top right panel: UMAP representation of the annotation of the combined dataset. Annotation was copied and combined from original publications (28, 29). Bottom panel: Dot plot of marker genes confirming cell identity. Gene markers for specific cell types were selected from literature (25–27).

Recent studies indicated that VSMCs display a high degree of plasticity and possess several differentiation potentials and phenotypes with changes in morphology and function (25–27). Therefore, and to support our IHC data, we assessed in which VSMC subtypes CDKL1 may be expressed by accessing 2 publicly available single-cell RNA-Seq datasets of aortic wall cells (28, 29). CDKL1 showed low but ubiquitous expression across all cell types present in the datasets (Figure 3B). Cell types showing slightly enriched CDKL1 expression as compared with general CDKL1 expression level in the dataset include lymphatic endothelial cells, neuronal cells, and VSMC subtype II (Figure 3B). The 3 defined VSMC subpopulations (I, II, and III) in our study consist primarily of contractile VSMCs according to coexpressed markers (specific markers: TAGLN, ACTA2, COL4A1); markers for synthetic VSMCs are also enriched (VIM, MYH10) (Figure 3B, dot plot) (25, 26, 30–32). VSMC subtype II may also include fibroblast-like VSMCs (specific markers: BGN, COL1A2, COL3A1) that have been shown to be present in both diseased and normal aorta (Figure 3B, dot plot) (33, 34).

Taken together, these data indicate that CDKL1 is expressed in VSMCs in the media of the aorta and of vasa vasorum; however, it is not yet entirely clear whether CDKL1-positive cells — in particular those strongly expressing CDKL1 — likely represent specific VSMC subpopulations.

Knockdown of Cdkl1 induces vascular malformation and aortic dilation in zebrafish. We next assessed whether CDKL1 is involved in vascular biology using a zebrafish model. All affected CDKL1 amino acids described in this study are conserved in zebrafish (Supplemental Figure 1). Whole-mount in situ hybridization during zebrafish development revealed cdkl1 expression in ciliated tissues including the neural tube, the pronephros, and the olfactory pit (beginning at 13 somite stage [ss], 20 ss, and 24 hours post-fertilization [hpf], respectively) (Supplemental Figure 8A). We blocked Cdkl1 expression by injection of 2 different morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) targeting either the start codon (ATG MO) or a splice site (splMO; splice blocking efficiency was verified by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR; Supplemental Figure 8B) in zebrafish embryos and analyzed intersomitic vessels (ISVs). ISVs connect the dorsal aorta or posterior cardinal vein to the dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessels and are considered a model system for the investigation of vascular development. Knockdown of Cdkl1 by either MO resulted in ISV malformations, shortening, and breakdown (Figure 4, A and B). This could be partially but significantly rescued by coinjection of RNA encoding human wild-type CDKL1 (CDKL1WT), thus confirming the specificity of the vascular defects and cross-species conservation of cdkl1 (Figure 4C). In contrast, coinjection of RNA coding for CDKL1Cys143Arg or CDKL1Ser206Leu did not rescue the ISV phenotype (Figure 4C). Injection of any CDKL1 RNA (encoding wild type, p.Cys143Arg, or p.Ser206Leu) alone did not produce significant vascular defects in zebrafish embryos (Figure 4C). However, long-term manifestations in adult zebrafish expressing CDKL1 missense variants cannot be excluded.

ISV malformation and aortic dilation in zebrafish cdkl1 morphants and crispFigure 4

ISV malformation and aortic dilation in zebrafish cdkl1 morphants and crispants. (A) ISV malformations in zebrafish embryos. Representative fluorescence images are shown for each phenotype; dorsal to the right. Cartoon illustrates aberrantly formed ISVs in 48-hpf fli-GFP embryos. (B) Quantification of ISV formation defects. (C) Coinjection of RNA encoding CDKL1WT rescued ISV defects upon MO-induced Cdkl1 knockdown, while variants encoding CDKL1Cys143Arg and CDKL1Ser206Leu are unable to rescue ISV malformations. Overexpression of CDKL1WT or its variants did not induce ISV defects. (D) Cdkl1 crispants (Cdkl1 Crispr) display ISV defects more often than do non-injected (NI) embryos or embryos injected with Cas9 only. Single ribonucleoprotein complexes including 2 guide RNAs (targeting Cdkl1 exons 6 and 7) and Cas9 were injected into the first cell of fertilized zebrafish eggs; as control, eggs were injected with Cas9 only. 1-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple-comparison tests were applied (B, C, and D). Bar graphs show means + SEM; n = 3 (B), n = 3–6 (C), and n = 4 (D) experiments. NS, P = 0.9806; ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001. (E) Coinjection of RNA encoding CDKL1WT rescued ISV defects upon CRISPR/Cas–mediated Cdkl1 knockdown, while neither mutant variant did so. n = 3 experiments. *P ≤ 0.05, **P = 0.0040, Brown-Forsythe and Welch’s ANOVA test with Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparison test. (F) Cdkl1 morphants display aortic dilation. Fli-GFP zebrafish embryos were injected with control (CTRL) MO or Cdkl1 splMO. Representative image of the dorsal aorta in embryos 4 days post-fertilization. Red bracket indicates width of the aorta. (G) Quantification of aortic dilation. (H) Cdkl1 crispants display aortic dilation. Single ribonucleoprotein complexes including 2 guide RNAs (targeting Cdkl1 exons 6 and 7) and Cas9 were injected into the first cell of fertilized zebrafish eggs; as control, eggs were injected with Cas9 only. 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test was applied; n = 3 experiments; red lines show medians; ***P = 0.0003, ****P < 0.0001 (G and H). Circles in the graphs indicate individual experiments, and numbers of embryos analyzed are given (B–E, G, and H).

To model Cdkl1 loss of function and to verify a vascular phenotype in zebrafish, we applied transient CRISPR/Cas9–mediated gene editing: Cdkl1 crispants showed strong ISV malformation (Figure 4D and Supplemental Figure 8C). This could be significantly rescued by coinjection of RNA encoding human wild-type CDKL1 (CDKL1WT), but not by coinjection of mutant CDKL1Cys143Arg or CDKL1Ser206Leu (Figure 4E). Next, we analyzed dorsal aortic morphology in 4-day-old zebrafish upon both knockdown and loss of Cdkl1 expression. Blocking Cdkl1 expression by injection of a splice site MO (splMO) resulted in significant aortic dilation (Figure 4, F and G). The dorsal aorta was also significantly dilated upon CRISPR/Cas9–mediated knockout of Cdkl1 in zebrafish embryos compared with embryos injected with Cas9 only (Figure 4H). Summarized, data from the zebrafish model suggest that loss of functional CDKL1 leads to abnormal vascular formation and aortic dilation.

CDKL1 variants show reduced kinase activities and affect substrate phosphorylation profiling. Two of the identified CDKL1 changes affect the magnesium binding loop (Supplemental Figure 1); therefore, we investigated whether the identified variants interfere with CDKL1 kinase activity. We expressed CDKL1 wild-type (CDKL1WT), CDKL1Cys143Arg, CDKL1Ser206Leu, and CDKL1Thr135Met in HeLa and HEK293T cells and performed in vitro kinase assays. Since no physiological substrate of CDKL1 is known, we used a suboptimal substrate (peptide sequence RPRSPGARR) that has been determined for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinases IME2 and CDC28 and applied previously to measure CDKL1 kinase activity (8, 35). S. cerevisiae IME2 and the kinase-dead variant CDKL1Lys33Arg were used as positive and negative controls, respectively (8). Compared with empty vector controls and CDKL1Lys33Arg, increased kinase activity was observed both for CDKL1WT and IME2 (Figure 5, A and B). We detected significantly reduced kinase activity for CDKL1Cys143Arg (Figure 5, A and B), CDKL1Ser206Leu (Figure 5A), and CDKL1Thr135Met (Figure 5B). These data demonstrate that p.Cys143Arg, p.Ser206Leu, and p.Thr135Met affect CDKL1 kinase function in vitro.

CDKL1 variants interfere with kinase function.Figure 5

CDKL1 variants interfere with kinase function. (A and B) In vitro kinase assays. HeLa (A) or HEK293T (B) cells were transiently transfected with CDKL1 and IME2 constructs or empty vectors (HAcontrol and EGFPcontrol). Fusion proteins were immunoprecipitated and subjected to kinase assays using peptide substrate RPRSPGARR and the ADP-Glo kinase assay (Promega). Luminescence intensities of individual measuring points were normalized to the entire luminescence signal of an experiment and to the amount of immunoprecipitated protein (n = 7, A; n = 4, B). Medians (50th percentiles, lines in boxes) as well as 0th, 25th, 75th, and 100th percentiles are given in the box plots. Small aliquots were removed from precipitates and subjected to immunoblotting using anti-HA (A) and anti-GFP (B) antibodies; representative blots are shown. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc multiple-comparison test. (C) CDKL1 serine/threonine phosphorylation profiling. EGFP-tagged CDKL1 variants were expressed in HEK293T cells, purified using GFP-Trap (ChromoTek), and applied to STK-PamChip arrays (PamGene). Seventy-one peptides passed quality control. The heatmap displays average log2-transformed signal intensities for indicated CDKL1 variants. The signals were sorted from high (red) to low (blue) intensity that corresponds to phosphorylation levels. To visualize overall sample variance and group differences, peptide phosphorylation and overall kinase activity are shown in box plot representation. (D) Peptide substrates with significantly changed phosphorylation. The heatmap shows significantly differentially phosphorylated peptides between samples treated with disease-associated CDKL1 variants versus CDKL1WT. The effects of CDKL1 variants are log ratios [log2(disease-associated CDKL1 variant)/log2(CDKL1WT)]. Blue and red indicate reduced and increased phosphorylation, respectively. Peptides that did not pass the significance threshold (P < 0.05, disease-associated CDKL1 variant vs. CDKL1WT) are black. Peptide numbers correspond to those in Supplemental Table 2, where details on the substrates are also described.

To verify that CDKL1Cys143Arg, CDKL1Ser206Leu, and CDKL1Thr135Met do impair CDKL1 kinase function, we used the microarray-based PamGene technology (https://pamgene.com/technology/). Our primary aim was not to identify CDKL1 substrates, because this in vitro method does not reveal what takes place physiologically. Assay functionality experiments are shown in Supplemental Figure 9, A and B. We applied recombinant CDKL1WT, CDKL1Thr135Met, CDKL1Cys143Arg, or CDKL1Ser206Leu to kinase reactions on peptide microarrays and quantified the phosphorylation of 144 serine/threonine substrate peptides. We observed differences in peptide phosphorylation patterns and, therefore, CDKL1 serine/threonine kinase function between CDKL1WT and disease-associated CDKL1 variants (Supplemental Figure 9C). Combined replicate results show generally lower signal intensities of phosphorylated peptides for disease-associated CDKL1, as confirmed by box plot analysis (Figure 5C). Phosphorylation of 60 peptides was significantly decreased in CDKL1Thr135Met-treated samples compared with CDKL1WT, of 30 in CDKL1Cys143Arg-treated samples, and of 27 in CDKL1Ser206Leu-treated samples (Figure 5D). In addition, application of CDKL1Ser206Leu resulted in increased phosphorylation of 7 peptides (Figure 5D). Phosphorylation of 20 peptide substrates was significantly reduced for all 3 disease-associated CDKL1 variants compared with CDKL1WT (Figure 5D). Information on peptide sequences is given in Supplemental Table 2. These data confirm that CDKL1Cys143Arg, CDKL1Ser206Leu, and CDKL1Thr135Met interfere with CDKL1 kinase function.

CDKL1 variants differ in protein complexing properties. To assess consequences for protein binding properties, we affinity-purified GFP-tagged CDKL1 variants from HEK293T lysates and analyzed precipitates by differential quantitative proteomics (tandem mass spectrometry). In total, we quantified 1,304 proteins; of these, 626 proteins were identified as ANOVA significant (q value < 0.05) between all compared variants (Figure 6A and Supplemental Table 3). CDKL1Thr135Met showed a relatively small effect on abundances of coprecipitated proteins compared with CDKL1WT, with no q value–significant proteins being present. In contrast, protein abundances were strongly affected for CDKL1Ser206Leu and CDKL1Cys143Arg (log2 difference > 0.58 or < 0.58, at least 1.5 times more or less abundant than in CDKL1WT) considering P value–significant proteins (Figure 6A, Supplemental Figure 10, and Supplemental Table 3). Moreover, protein abundances for CDKL1Ser206Leu strongly differed from those for CDKL1WT samples and EGFP controls, as suggested by a high number of q value–significant proteins. This may indicate loss of physiological protein-protein interactions and extensive unspecific binding for this variant (Figure 6A, Supplemental Figure 10, and Supplemental Table 3). Finally, protein abundances in kinase-dead CDKL1Lys33Arg samples were similar to those in CDKL1Cys143Arg samples, consistent with impaired kinase activity for both variants (Figure 6A, Supplemental Figure 10, and Supplemental Table 3). Taken together, these data suggest variant-specific consequences for CDKL1 binding properties in addition to mutation effect overlaps. Notably, 36 of 626 (5.75%) significantly differentially abundant proteins between all compared CDKL1 variants were found in the Gene Ontology Cellular Component (GOCC) gene/protein set Cilium (GO:0005929) (Figure 6B). In particular, proteins involved in intraflagellar transport (IFT) (e.g., IFT52, IFT172, etc.) showed major differences between CDKL1 variants (Figure 6B), indicating that disease-associated CDKL1 variants may affect intraflagellar transport to cilia. We validated CDKL1 variant–specific effects on protein-protein interaction with IFT52, IFT172, CFAP20, and TUBA1A by using coimmunoprecipitations and statistical analyses (Figure 6, C and D).

Disease-associated CDKL1 variants show different protein-protein interactioFigure 6

Disease-associated CDKL1 variants show different protein-protein interaction profiles. EGFP-tagged CDKL1 protein variants were expressed in HEK293T cells, purified by GFP-Trap, and subjected to liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Experimental duplicates were performed for all conditions. Protein abundances were normalized based on GFP protein peptide abundances. (A and B) Heatmaps: Pearson correlation–based hierarchical clustering of EGFP-vector, CDKL1WT, CDKL1Lys33Arg, CDKL1Thr135Met, CDKL1Cys143Arg, and CDKL1Ser206Leu samples with average linkage, based on 626 ANOVA-significant proteins (A) and on 36 cilium proteins, assigned to the GOCC gene set Cilium (B) between all analyzed phenotypes (adjusted P value < 0.05). Normalized protein abundances were scaled before clustering for visual purposes. Relative protein abundance is coded by colors from red (high abundance) to blue (low abundance). (C and D) Validation of differentially affected protein-protein interactions. Total cell lysates (TCL) of HEK293T cells expressing EGFP-tagged CDKL1 protein variants or EGFP (control) were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) using GFP-Trap beads. CDKL1 expression and precipitation efficiencies were determined by anti-GFP immunoblotting. Coprecipitation and input levels of endogenous IFT52, IFT172, CFAP20, and TUBA1A were assessed by immunoblotting using specific primary antibodies; GAPDH was used as loading control (C). The graph shows mean relative amounts of coprecipitated IFT52, IFT172, CFAP20, and TUBA1A normalized to precipitated GFP (D). The mean of experiments for CDKL1WT (IFT52, IFT172, CFAP20) and CDKL1Ser206Leu (TUBA1A) was set to 1. **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA. n = 3 experiments.

CDKL1 variants interfere with cilia formation, cilia length, and ciliary localization of CDKL1. Caenorhabditiselegans Cdkl1 localizes to the transition zone above the basal body and controls cilia length (8, 36, 37). To test whether disease-associated variants affect cilia formation, cilia length, or ciliary localization of CDKL1, we expressed EGFP-tagged CDKL1 variants in RPE-1 and HEK293T cells and costained acetylated tubulin (as a marker for the axoneme) and γ-tubulin or pericentrin (as markers for the basal body). Overexpression of any variant (WT, p.Cys143Arg, p.Ser206Leu) in RPE-1 cells reduced the number of ciliated cells to a similar level, in comparison with vector controls (Figure 7A). Gene dosage appeared to matter, as RPE-1 cells strongly overexpressing EGFP-CDKL1WT no longer formed any cilium, whereas cells strongly overexpressing EGFP-CDKL1Cys143Arg or EGFP-CDKL1Ser206Leu still did (Figure 7A, microscopy images). Moreover, RPE-1 cells transfected with CDKL1 patient variants extended 2 cilia significantly more often than cells expressing wild-type CDKL1 (Figure 7B). In HEK293T cells, expression of CDKL1WT shortened ciliary length in comparison with EGFPcontrol cells, consistent with an inhibitory effect on ciliation seen in RPE-1 cells, and expression of CDKL1Cys143Arg, CDKL1Thr135Met, and CDKL1Lys33Arg resulted in elongated cilia (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure 11). Cilia length in cells expressing CDKL1Ser206Leu was similar to that in EGFPcontrol cells (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure 11). Statistical evaluation confirmed these observations (Figure 7C). To identify whether this may be a direct effect of CDKL1 on cilia, we assessed the subcellular localization more closely. All CDKL1 variants showed a prominent nuclear localization (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure 11). In addition, CDKL1WT localizes to the tip of the axoneme in 23.8% of cells and to the ciliary base in 95.2% of cells (i.e., 71.4% base + 23.8% base and tip); we observed a similar distribution for CDKL1Thr135Met (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure 11). The localization at the tip of the axoneme was increased for CDKL1Cys143Arg (45.8%) and CDKL1Lys33Arg (52.9%) (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure 11). CDKL1Ser206Leu did not localize to the tip of the axoneme and could be observed at the base of the cilium only in 60.7% of cells (Figure 7C and Supplemental Figure 11). These data demonstrate that human CDKL1 controls cilia formation and that disease-associated CDKL1 variants display altered functionality toward cilia.

Consequences of CDKL1 variants for ciliary biology.Figure 7

Consequences of CDKL1 variants for ciliary biology. (A) Expression of CDKL1 variants affects primary cilia formation. EGFP-CDKL1 variants were transiently expressed in RPE-1 cells (green), serum-starved to induce ciliation, and stained for the axoneme of primary cilia with anti–acetylated tubulin (Ac. tub., magenta). Scale bar: 10 μm. n = 5 experiments with more than 100 cells per condition and experiment counted. **P = 0.0083, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple-comparison post-test. (B) Expression of disease-associated CDKL1 variants increases number of bi-ciliated RPE-1 cells. EGFP-CDKL1 variants were transiently expressed in RPE-1 cells (green) and stained for the axoneme with anti–acetylated tubulin (Ac. tub., green) and for the basal body with anti–γ-tubulin (G.-tub., magenta) antibodies. Scale bar: 5 μm. n = 3 experiments with 211–441 ciliated cells counted. *P = 0.0309, **P = 0.0070, Brown-Forsythe and Welch’s ANOVA test with Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparison test. (C) CDKL1 variants localize at the basal body (and tip) of the primary cilium and affect cilia length in HEK293T cells. EGFP-CDKL1 variants were transiently expressed in HEK293T cells (green). Cells were stained for the axoneme of primary cilia with anti–acetylated tubulin (red) and for the basal body with anti-pericentrin (cyan) antibodies. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Shown are representative images of CDKL1-expressing cells with primary cilia; further images are given in Supplemental Figure 11. Scale bars: 10 μm, and 1 μm in close-up images. Quantification of cilium length: n = 3 experiments with ≥20 cilia per condition measured; median (red bars) and individual experiments (circles) are indicated. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001, Brown-Forsythe and Bartlett’s ANOVA test with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Quantification of CDKL1 localization: Stacked bar graphs summarize 3 experiments with ≥17 cilia per condition analyzed. ****P < 0.0001, Fisher’s exact test. All images (A–C) were acquired with a confocal microscope.

CDKL1 variants increase p38 (MAPK14) signaling in HEK293T cells, and knockdown of Cdkl1 induces Vegf signaling in zebrafish. To track down CDKL1-induced alterations in specific cell signaling pathways, we carried out extensive immunoblot analyses in HEK293T cells cultured under basal conditions. We could not detect altered expression or activation of proteins associated with cilia biology (NOTCH-, WNT-, and SHH-dependent signaling routes) (Supplemental Figure 12) or involved in cell cycle regulation (cyclins, CDKs, and p21Waf1/Cip1) (Supplemental Figure 13). For background information regarding these analyses, see Supplemental Results under the subsection Analysis of candidate CDKL1-dependent signaling pathways. TAAD is closely associated with dysregulation of TGFB signaling (1, 2), and TGFB signaling plays multiple roles in cilia (38). We could not identify an involvement of CDKL1 in canonical TGFB signaling via SMAD2/3 (Supplemental Figure 14A) and non-canonical TGFB signaling branches via MEK-ERK and AKT (Supplemental Figure 14, B and D). TGFB can also rapidly activate the so-called stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs) p38 (MAPK14) and JNK (MAPK8) in a SMAD-independent (i.e., non-canonical) manner, including in cilia (39, 40). CDKL1 p.Lys33Arg, p.Cys143Arg, p.Thr135Met, and p.Ser206Leu significantly increased p38 phosphorylation (Figure 8A). Moreover, expression of disease-associated CDKL1 variants slightly induced phosphorylation of JNK compared with CDKL1WT (Supplemental Figure 14C). These data suggest that expression of CDKL1 variants results in dysregulation of p38, which is involved in a wide variety of cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, development, survival, apoptosis, senescence, and cytokine production. Next, we tested canonical Wnt signaling (via the downstream effector Axin2), Hedgehog signaling (via the downstream effector Patched1), and Vegf signaling in zebrafish. Only Vegfaa, which is orthologous to human VEGFA, showed significant upregulation upon knockdown of Cdkl1 (Figure 8B). This is consistent with previous reports suggesting that elevated Vegf signaling is associated with ISV defects and induction of plexin D1 expression (41, 42). In line with this, Cdkl1 inhibition resulted in elevated expression of the arterial marker proteins ephB2A and plexin D1 (Figure 8C), which have previously been associated with expansion of arterial cells (43) and aberrant ISV formation, respectively (44).

CDKL1 function in cell signaling.Figure 8

CDKL1 function in cell signaling. (A) CDKL1 variants increase signaling via p38 (MAPK8). Total lysates of HEK293T cells transiently expressing CDKL1WT, CDKL1Thr135Met, CDKL1Cys143Arg, or CDKL1Ser206Leu were cultured under basal conditions (DMEM containing 10% serum), lysed, and subjected to immunoblotting as indicated. Cells expressing kinase-dead CDKL1Lys33Arg and cells transfected with empty vector (EV) were used as controls. GAPDH was used as loading control. Representative immunoblots from 5 independent experiments (n = 5) are given. Graph shows means (± SD) of the relative phosphorylation of p38 (at Thr180 and Tyr182) normalized to amounts of total p38 as well as to GAPDH. Phosphorylation levels in cells expressing CDKL1 mutants are relative to those in CDKL1WT cells. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01. (B) Knockdown of Cdkl1 induces Vegfaa expression. Quantitative PCR analysis was performed on total RNA of 24 hpf zebrafish embryos. Graphs show amounts of axin2, patched1, and vegfaa transcripts in Cdkl1 splMO relative to CTRL MO–treated embryos. n = 8 experiments; mean values (red bars) and individual experiments (circles) are indicated. **P = 0.07, 2-tailed Wilcoxon’s test. (C) Expression of the arterial marker ephrin B2a (ephB2a) and of plexin D1 (plxnD1) is stronger in Cdkl1 morphants than in control-injected embryos. Spatial expression was determined by in situ hybridization. Stacked bar graphs summarize 3 experiments with 82 (CTRL MO) and 85 embryos (Cdkl1 splMO) for ephB2a and 3 experiments with 63 (CTRL MO) and 42 embryos (Cdkl1 splMO) for plxnD1. **P = 0.0018, ***P = 0.0003, 2-sided Fisher’s exact test. All experiments were done at 24 hpf. Scale bars: 200 μm.

Discussion

Clinical aspects. Recurrent vascular manifestations in our series of individuals with heterozygous CDKL1 include aneurysms and dissections of the thoracic/abdominal aorta and of the carotid arteries (Table 1). In 5 of the 6 patients, craniofacial and/or skeletal manifestations were diagnosed (Table 1). Other clinical features in the individuals described in this study, such as hernias, dural ectasia, and myopia, have been reported in hereditary aortopathies, e.g., Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (2, 4). Patients with CDKL1 variants show overlaps and differences in their clinical manifestations; this may reflect similar and variant-specific cell physiological effects of CDKL1 variants as detected in our functional tests. In line with the clinical presentation of the patients in this study, several TAAD disease genes (e.g., SMAD3 and TGFBR1) are associated with a broad phenotypic spectrum including aneurysms/dissections of other arteries in addition to the aorta (45). Taken together, the collected clinical data may suggest that CDKL1-associated vasculopathy might be characterized by an involvement of large to medium-sized arteries in addition to the clinical manifestations known for hereditary aortopathies (2, 4).

Recently, it was reported that de novo variants in CDKL1 and CDKL2 are associated with neurodevelopmental symptoms (46). Regarding the 2 identified CDKL1 variants, dominant-negative (antimorphic) consequences have been suggested (46). In contrast, our data indicate amorphic/hypomorphic, neomorphic, and hypermorphic consequences of CDKL1 variants identified in our patients (for details, see Supplemental Data: Discussion). Notably, 2 of the patients with CDKL2 variants show subdural hemorrhage and connective tissue defects (46), suggesting pleiotropic manifestations of CDKL2 variants. In general, ciliary dysfunction has been associated with a remarkable variability of phenotypic presentation with multiorgan involvement and allelism (47, 48). Clinical presentation ranges from single-organ impairment to complex systemic disorders including renal, endocrine, cardiovascular, skeletal, respiratory, genital, pancreatic, hepatic, retinal, neuronal, and other anomalies (49, 50). In conclusion, CDKL1 variants may exert allelic and pleiotropic consequences affecting various tissues and organs.

Genetic perspectives and architecture. Hereditary aortopathies are characterized by reduced penetrance, highly variable expressivity, and late onset; moreover, the presence of genetic modifiers and reduced-penetrance alleles has been proposed (2, 4, 51, 52). This may also explain the negative family history in family 3 (Table 1). Moreover, a complex genetic architecture (di-/oligo-/polygenic inheritance) with rare variants having large effects and common alleles having low to moderate effect sizes may account for a considerable number of aortic disease (3, 6, 52). Here, we describe variable expressivity (e.g., age of disease onset, affected arteries; Table 1, families 1 and 2) and concomitant variants (patient P6). Therefore, we suggest that adverse functional CDKL1 variants may represent dynamic disease alleles for a CTD with potentially marked effect sizes depending on the respective genetic background. Taken together, we support the notion that hereditary aortopathies and arterial aneurysms/dissections show a complex genetic architecture with penetrant mutations and variants with small to moderate effect sizes (3, 52).

Zebrafish vascular defects as indicator of human TAAD-associated genes. It has been reported that zebrafish cdkl1 morphants showed eye anomalies, small brains, and curved bodies, and coinjection of wild-type cdkl1 mRNA partially rescued these phenotypes, so that zcdkl1 was regarded as an important developmental gene (53). In our hands, however, no gross morphological changes in the embryos devoid of functional Cdkl1 could be observed except for vascular defects. Indeed, we demonstrated that knockdown and transient knockout of cdkl1 induces aortic dilation and ISV malformation in zebrafish. Several groups have used the zebrafish model to investigate the effects of TAAD-associated genes on the vasculature: Global Secisbp2 (i.e., zebrafish ortholog of the TAAD disease gene SECISBP2) deficiency resulted in dilation of the ventral aorta in zebrafish larvae (54). Injection of TAAD-associated SMAD3 variant mRNA resulted in enlargement of the dorsal aorta in zebrafish embryos (55). Knockdown of the mat2aa gene (i.e., zebrafish ortholog of the TAAD-associated gene MAT2A) resulted in developmental defects including malformation of the aortic arches (56). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that knockout of the Marfan syndrome– and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome–related genes fbn1, col1a2, col5a1, and col5a2 resulted in various cardiovascular and skeletal defects such as reduced diameter of the aorta and ISVs, inappropriate ISV branching, and scoliosis in zebrafish (57).

Molecular pathology. Recently, Canning et al. revealed a role for C. elegans cdkl1 in the length regulation of primary cilia, organelles that perform essential roles in human sensory physiology, cell signaling, and development (8, 37); this function was lost in a kinase-dead mutant and by introduction of disease-linked mutations (8). Consequently, a possible role for mammalian CDKL proteins in human physiology and disease has been suggested (8, 37). IFT is required for the assembly and maintenance of cilia, as well as for cilium-dependent signaling; IFT protein complexes function as adaptors facilitating cargo transport between the base and tip of the cilium (58, 59). The basal body anchors and positions the cilium within the cell (58, 59). C. elegans cdkl1 is an IFT-associated cargo protein that relies on IFT for its transport to cilia (37). Given the observation that CDKL1 variants interacting with IFT proteins (i.e., CDKL1WT, CDKL1Thr135Met, CDKL1Cys143Arg, and CDKL1Lys33Arg) but not IFT binding–deficient CDKL1Ser206Leu localize at the axoneme (Figure 7C), we speculate that impaired binding to the IFT system may result in CDKL1 mislocalization. Consequently, we assume that altered subcellular distribution due to aberrant protein interactions may represent the basic molecular defect for CDKL1Ser206Leu, whereas impaired kinase function rather than mislocalization is the primary molecular defect for CDKL1Thr135Met, CDKL1Cys143Arg, and CDKL1Lys33Arg.

Primary cilia are fundamentally important for the structure and the function of VSMCs within the arteries (60, 61). Primary cilia of VSMCs are preferentially oriented, possess proteins critical for cell-ECM interactions, and respond to ECM proteins and mechanical stimulations (62, 63). Thus, the primary cilia of VSMCs can act as mechanochemical sensors (i.e., to sense the surrounding mechanical and chemical stimuli), thereby affecting VSMC function and phenotype (60, 62–69). Since VSMCs and the ECM are essential for regulating vascular tissue homeostasis, differentiation, and wound repair, cilium-mediated functions may be pivotal for maintaining vascular functional integrity (62, 69). More detailed background information is given in the Supplemental Data: Discussion. Based on this knowledge, it was proposed that proteins involved in mechanosensing biology are associated with aortic disease (70). Indeed, ciliary dysfunction can induce aneurysm formation and progression (60, 71–74), and several TAAD disease genes are involved in mechanosensing and the contractile response of cells (3, 51). We detected CDKL1-positive VSMCs in the aortic wall, and we showed that disease-associated, functional CDKL1 variants interfere with cilia formation and length, affect CDKL1 binding with proteins particularly involved in ciliary transport, and increase SAPK (p38) activation. p38 is central for the cellular response to virtually all types of stress, including mechanical forces perceived by cilia (60, 75). We speculate that increased activation of SAPK may result from stress induced by aberrant environmental sensing due to defective sensory cilia in VSMCs. Notably, increased p38 signaling upon cellular stress has been previously associated with different etiologies of cardiovascular disease (76). Upon knockdown of Cdkl1 in zebrafish, we detected increased Vegfaa, which is orthologous to human VEGFA. VEGF has essential roles in both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, and it has been demonstrated that VEGF expression is stimulated by TGFB and positively regulated by p38 in several cell types (77–80). Moreover, increased VEGF has been associated with abdominal aneurysm in patients (81), and inhibition of VEGFA suppressed aneurysm formation in a mouse model (82). In conclusion, our findings support the idea that pathogenic CDKL1 variants interfere with cilia formation/homeostasis in aortic VSMCs, which causes aberrant environmental sensing by primary cilia and altered cilia-dependent signaling; this molecular dysfunction underlies a CTD associated with aortic/arterial aneurysm and dissection. The presented data, therefore, may expand our knowledge of the molecular pathophysiology of this group of disorders.

Limitations. The pedigrees of the families described in this study are small for a complex inherited disorder known for its heterogeneous genetic and environmental factors. Moreover, phenotypes and CDKL1 genotypes of several relatives are not available; thus cosegregation analysis is incomplete. Exome sequencing and targeted next-generation sequencing do not capture structural variants, copy number variations, or non-coding/intronic variants. Thus, it cannot be ruled out that such variants within known disease genes cause the clinical manifestation in our patients. The association, discussed above, of increased SAPK activation in HEK293T cells and enhanced Vegfaa abundance in zebrafish is a speculative attempt at explanation that requires validation. Alternatively, defective ciliary biology first may lead to altered VEGF abundance, resulting in SAPK activation.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. Sex was not considered as a biological variable.

Analytical and descriptive procedures. All experimental work, i.e., all analytical and descriptive analyses, is reported in Supplemental Methods.

Statistics. Methods of statistical analysis are given in Supplemental Methods. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Types of statistical analyses and — where applicable — specific P values are specified in the respective figure legends.

Study approval. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All analyses were performed clinically as required and approved by national legal regulation (German Genetic Diagnosis Act) and the local Institutional Review Board of the Hamburg Medical Association (votes PV3759, PV7038), Hamburg, Germany. Study participants gave their written informed consent to genetic analyses, clinical data and specimen collection, as well as pseudonymized publication of study results.

Data availability. All supporting data including materials and methods are available within the article and supplemental material. Values for all data points in graphs and behind reported means are provided in the Supporting Data Values file. Due to legal and ethical considerations, human sequencing data beyond those published as part of this project will not be made publicly available. Proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD048044.

Author contributions

GR conceptualized, supervised, and administered the study. MP, TS, TJD, and GR acquired funding. TN, MP, MK, HV, MA, TJD, and GR wrote (parts of) the original draft of the manuscript. MS, CK, TJD, and GR reviewed and edited the manuscript. TN, SR, MDB, BS, AB, VR, SD, and K Hoffer conducted experiments. TN, MP, CS, K Händler, BS, TM, MK, HV, MA, SK, and GR acquired, analyzed, and curated data. HS, JO, TSM, YVK, EG, MR, TS, and TJD identified the patients, performed clinical assessment, and provided clinical samples.

TN did most of the experimental work and generated most of the data; therefore, she merited the first place in the order of the first authors. The contribution of MP as a principal investigator was critical for the article, as she enabled zebrafish experiments and immunocytochemistry in RPE-1 cells. It was felt that MP merited the second place in the shared first authorship. Both first authors agreed to this order of first authorship.

Funding support
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) RO3660/3-1 and RO3660/7-1 to GR.
  • DFG SA4284/4-1 to TS.
  • DFG PH144/4-1, PH144/4-3, and 467868420 (funding of Stellaris 5 confocal microscope) to MP.
  • Clinician Scientist Programme of the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (FKZ 81X3710109 to TJD).
  • DFG (no. 247354600 to the Core Facility Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics).
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Unedited blot and gel images

View Supplemental table 3

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We thank the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) Microscopy Imaging Facility for assistance and the Core Facility Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics as part of the Technology Platform Mass Spectrometry at the University of Hamburg and the UKE for support with mass spectrometric measurements and analysis. We thank all patients and families for their participation in this study. Finally, we thank Cornelia Donow, Lukas Grein, and Kristin Hartmann for excellent fish care and/or superior technical assistance.

Address correspondence to: Georg Rosenberger, Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49.40.7410.54534; Email: rosenberger@uke.de.

Footnotes

YVK’s present address is: Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Gefäßchirurgie, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

EG’s present address is: Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Clinic Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

HV’s present address is: Group of Immunoproteomics, Department of Immunodynamics, Institute for Experimental Immunology and Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2025, Nauth et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(23):e186287. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI186287.

References
  1. Chou EL, Lindsay ME. The genetics of aortopathies: hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(1):136–148.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Verstraeten A, et al. Aetiology and management of hereditary aortopathy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(4):197–208.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Chou E, et al. Genetics and mechanisms of thoracic aortic disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(3):168–180.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Luyckx I, et al. Update on the molecular landscape of thoracic aortic aneurysmal disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022;37(3):201–211.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Vanakker O, et al. The genetics of soft connective tissue disorders. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:229–255.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Pinard A, et al. Genetics of thoracic and abdominal aortic diseases. Circ Res. 2019;124(4):588–606.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Renard M, et al. Clinical validity of genes for heritable thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(6):605–615.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Canning P, et al. CDKL family kinases have evolved distinct structural features and ciliary function. Cell Rep. 2018;22(4):885–894.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Tao J, et al. Mutations in the X-linked cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5/STK9) gene are associated with severe neurodevelopmental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75(6):1149–1154.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Hector RD, et al. CDKL5 variants: improving our understanding of a rare neurologic disorder. Neurol Genet. 2017;3(6):e200.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Lindy AS, et al. Diagnostic outcomes for genetic testing of 70 genes in 8565 patients with epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorders. Epilepsia. 2018;59(5):1062–1071.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Demarest ST, et al. CDKL5 deficiency disorder: relationship between genotype, epilepsy, cortical visual impairment, and development. Epilepsia. 2019;60(8):1733–1742.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Fernandez-Marmiesse A, et al. Rare variants in 48 genes account for 42% of cases of epilepsy with or without neurodevelopmental delay in 246 pediatric patients. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1135.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Karczewski KJ, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581(7809):434–443.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Rout AK, et al. Deep insights into the mode of ATP-binding mechanism in Zebrafish cyclin-dependent protein kinase-like 1 (zCDKL1): a molecular dynamics approach. J Mol Graph Model. 2018;81:175–183.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. MacKay CI, et al. Expanding the phenotype of the CDKL5 deficiency disorder: are seizures mandatory? Am J Med Genet A. 2020;182(5):1217–1222.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Richards S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Stenson PD, et al. Human gene mutation database (HGMD): 2003 update. Hum Mutat. 2003;21(6):577–581.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Landrum MJ, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(d1):D1062–D1067.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Wallace SE, et al. MYLK pathogenic variants aortic disease presentation, pregnancy risk, and characterization of pathogenic missense variants. Genet Med. 2019;21(1):144–151.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Milewicz DM, Cecchi AC. Heritable thoracic aortic disease overview. In: Adam MP, et al., eds. GeneReviews. University of Washington; 1993.
  22. Verdonschot JAJ, et al. A mutation update for the FLNC gene in myopathies and cardiomyopathies. Hum Mutat. 2020;41(6):1091–1111.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Westra D, et al. Panel-based exome sequencing for neuromuscular disorders as a diagnostic service. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;6(2):241–258.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Sjostedt E, et al. An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain. Science. 2020;367(6482):eaay5947.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Cao G, et al. How vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype switching contributes to vascular disease. Cell Commun Signal. 2022;20(1):180.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Cao G, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic landscape in aortic aneurysm. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):113.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Tao J, et al. Vascular stem/progenitor cells in vessel injury and repair. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:845070.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Chou EL, et al. Aortic cellular diversity and quantitative genome-wide association study trait prioritization through single-nuclear RNA sequencing of the aneurysmal human aorta. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2022;42(11):1355–1374.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Pirruccello JP, et al. Deep learning enables genetic analysis of the human thoracic aorta. Nat Genet. 2022;54(1):40–51.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Frismantiene A, et al. Smooth muscle cell-driven vascular diseases and molecular mechanisms of VSMC plasticity. Cell Signal. 2018;52:48–64.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Tierney JW, et al. Therapeutic MK2 inhibition blocks pathological vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype switch. JCI Insight. 2021;6(19):e142339.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Beamish JA, et al. Molecular regulation of contractile smooth muscle cell phenotype: implications for vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(5):467–491.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Li Y, et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation. 2020;142(14):1374–1388.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Pedroza AJ, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype modulation in Marfan syndrome aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(9):2195–2211.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Holt LJ, et al. Evolution of Ime2 phosphorylation sites on Cdk1 substrates provides a mechanism to limit the effects of the phosphatase Cdc14 in meiosis. Mol Cell. 2007;25(5):689–702.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Li C, et al. MKS5 and CEP290 dependent assembly pathway of the ciliary transition zone. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(3):e1002416.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Park K, et al. CDKL kinase regulates the length of the ciliary proximal segment. Curr Biol. 2021;31(11):2359–2373.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Christensen ST, et al. Primary cilia and coordination of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(6):a028167.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Tzavlaki K, Moustakas A. TGF-β signaling. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3):487.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Anvarian Z, et al. Cellular signalling by primary cilia in development, organ function and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(4):199–219.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Lange M, et al. Zebrafish mutants in vegfab can affect endothelial cell proliferation without altering ERK phosphorylation and are phenocopied by loss of PI3K signaling. Dev Biol. 2022;486:26–43.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Kim J, et al. Semaphorin 3E-Plexin-D1 signaling regulates VEGF function in developmental angiogenesis via a feedback mechanism. Genes Dev. 2011;25(13):1399–1411.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Casie Chetty S, et al. Vegf signaling promotes vascular endothelial differentiation by modulating etv2 expression. Dev Biol. 2017;424(2):147–161.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Hogan BM, Schulte-Merker S. How to plumb a pisces: understanding vascular development and disease using zebrafish embryos. Dev Cell. 2017;42(6):567–583.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Milewicz DM, et al. Update on the genetic risk for thoracic aortic aneurysms and acute aortic dissections: implications for clinical care. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2021;62(3):203–210.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  46. Bereshneh AH, et al. De novo variants in CDKL1 and CDKL2 are associated with neurodevelopmental symptoms. Am J Hum Genet. 2025;112(4):846–862.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Shamseldin HE, et al. The morbid genome of ciliopathies: an update. Genet Med. 2020;22(6):1051–1060.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Shamseldin HE, et al. The morbid genome of ciliopathies: an update [erratum]. Genet Med. 2022;24(4):966.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Alzarka B, et al. Diseases of the primary cilia: a clinical characteristics review. Pediatr Nephrol. 2025;40(3):611–627.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Focsa IO, et al. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity of primary ciliopathies (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2021;48(3):176.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Rodrigues Bento J, et al. The genetics and typical traits of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2022;23:223–253.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Cecchi AC, et al. Current state and future directions of genomic medicine in aortic dissection: a path to prevention and personalized care. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35(1):51–59.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Hsu LS, et al. Zebrafish cyclin-dependent protein kinase-like 1 (zcdkl1): identification and functional characterization. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(6):3606–3617.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Schoenmakers E, et al. Selenoprotein deficiency disorder predisposes to aortic aneurysm formation. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):7994.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Sheppard MB, et al. Novel SMAD3 variant identified in a patient with familial aortopathy modeled using a zebrafish embryo assay. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1103784.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Guo DC, et al. MAT2A mutations predispose individuals to thoracic aortic aneurysms. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(1):170–177.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Prendergast A, et al. Phenotyping zebrafish mutant models to assess candidate genes associated with aortic aneurysm. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(1):123.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Bhogaraju S, et al. Intraflagellar transport complex structure and cargo interactions. Cilia. 2013;2(1):10.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Lechtreck KF. IFT-cargo interactions and protein transport in cilia. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40(12):765–778.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Pala R, et al. The roles of primary cilia in cardiovascular diseases. Cells. 2018;7(12):233.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Qi YX, et al. Mechanobiology and vascular remodeling: from membrane to nucleus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1097:69–82.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Hosio M, et al. Primary ciliary signaling in the skin-contribution to wound healing and scarring. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:578384.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Lu CJ, et al. Non-random distribution and sensory functions of primary cilia in vascular smooth muscle cells. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2008;31(3):171–184.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Wu J, et al. Characterization of primary cilia in human airway smooth muscle cells. Chest. 2009;136(2):561–570.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Poole CA, et al. Confocal analysis of primary cilia structure and colocalization with the Golgi apparatus in chondrocytes and aortic smooth muscle cells. Cell Biol Int. 1997;21(8):483–494.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Qian Q, et al. Analysis of the polycystins in aortic vascular smooth muscle cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(9):2280–2287.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Shi ZD, Tarbell JM. Fluid flow mechanotransduction in vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39(6):1608–1619.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Reho JJ, et al. Smooth muscle cell-specific disruption of the bbsome causes vascular dysfunction. Hypertension. 2019;74(4):817–825.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Raines EW. The extracellular matrix can regulate vascular cell migration, proliferation, and survival: relationships to vascular disease. Int J Exp Pathol. 2000;81(3):173–182.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Yamashiro Y, et al. Abnormal mechanosensing and cofilin activation promote the progression of ascending aortic aneurysms in mice. Sci Signal. 2015;8(399):ra105.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Aboualaiwi WA, et al. Survivin-induced abnormal ploidy contributes to cystic kidney and aneurysm formation. Circulation. 2014;129(6):660–672.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Liu M, et al. Primary cilia deficiency induces intracranial aneurysm. Shock. 2018;49(5):604–611.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Luu VZ, et al. Role of endothelial primary cilia as fluid mechanosensors on vascular health. Atherosclerosis. 2018;275:196–204.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Mohieldin AM, et al. Vascular endothelial primary cilia: mechanosensation and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2016;12(1):57–67.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Canovas B, Nebreda AR. Diversity and versatility of p38 kinase signalling in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(5):346–366.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Coulthard LR, et al. p38(MAPK): stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Trends Mol Med. 2009;15(8):369–379.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Tokuda H, et al. Involvement of MAP kinases in TGF-beta-stimulated vascular endothelial growth factor synthesis in osteoblasts. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;415(1):117–125.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Pages G, et al. Stress-activated protein kinases (JNK and p38/HOG) are essential for vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA stability. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(34):26484–26491.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Kim JH, et al. p38 MAPK inhibition selectively mitigates inflammatory mediators and VEGF production in AF cells co-cultured with activated macrophage-like THP-1 cells. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(12):1662–1669.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Cuenda A, Rousseau S. p38 MAP-kinases pathway regulation, function and role in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773(8):1358–1375.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Kaneko H, et al. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor-A in development of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;91(2):358–367.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Xu B, et al. Inhibition of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-A or its receptor activity suppresses experimental aneurysm progression in the aortic elastase infusion model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(8):1652–1666.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Kopanos C, et al. VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(11):1978–1980.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Hebsgaard SM, et al. Splice site prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana pre-mRNA by combining local and global sequence information. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(17):3439–3452.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Reese MG, et al. Improved splice site detection in Genie. J Comput Biol. 1997;4(3):311–323.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (October 7, 2025): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (December 1, 2025): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts