BACKGROUND Neoantigens derived from KRASMUT have been described, but the fine antigen specificity of T cell responses directed against these epitopes is poorly understood. Here, we explore KRASMUT immunogenicity and the properties of 4 T cell receptors (TCRs) specific for KRASG12V restricted to the HLA-A3 superfamily of class I alleles.METHODS A phase 1 clinical vaccine trial targeting KRASMUT was conducted. TCRs targeting KRASG12V restricted to HLA-A*03:01 or HLA-A*11:01 were isolated from vaccinated patients or healthy individuals. A comprehensive analysis of TCR antigen specificity, affinity, crossreactivity, and CD8 coreceptor dependence was performed. TCR lytic activity was evaluated, and target antigen density was determined by quantitative immunopeptidomics.RESULTS Vaccination against KRASMUT resulted in the priming of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses. KRASG12V -specific natural (not affinity enhanced) TCRs exhibited exquisite specificity to mutated protein with no discernible reactivity against KRASWT. TCR-recognition motifs were determined and used to identify and exclude crossreactivity to noncognate peptides derived from the human proteome. Both HLA-A*03:01 and HLA-A*11:01–restricted TCR-redirected CD8+ T cells exhibited potent lytic activity against KRASG12V cancers, while only HLA-A*11:01–restricted TCR-T CD4+ T cells exhibited antitumor effector functions consistent with partial coreceptor dependence. All KRASG12V-specific TCRs displayed high sensitivity for antigen as demonstrated by their ability to eliminate tumor cell lines expressing low levels of peptide/HLA (4.4 to 242) complexes per cell.CONCLUSION This study identifies KRASG12V-specific TCRs with high therapeutic potential for the development of TCR-T cell therapies.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03592888.FUNDING AACR SU2C/Lustgarten Foundation, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and NIH.
Adham S. Bear, Rebecca B. Nadler, Mark H. O’Hara, Kelsey L. Stanton, Chong Xu, Robert J. Saporito, Andrew J. Rech, Miren L. Baroja, Tatiana Blanchard, Maxwell H. Elliott, Michael J. Ford, Richard Jones, Shivang Patel, Andrea Brennan, Zachary O’Neil, Daniel J. Powell Jr., Robert H. Vonderheide, Gerald P. Linette, Beatriz M. Carreno
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,923 | 658 |
| 712 | 202 | |
| Figure | 1,107 | 4 |
| Table | 335 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 805 | 137 |
| Citation downloads | 221 | 0 |
| Totals | 7,103 | 1,001 |
| Total Views | 8,104 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.