Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Lung inflammatory injury and tissue repair (Jul 2023)
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
RGS2-mediated translational control mediates cancer cell dormancy and tumor relapse
Jaebeom Cho, … , Mien-Chie Hung, Ho-Young Lee
Jaebeom Cho, … , Mien-Chie Hung, Ho-Young Lee
Published January 4, 2021
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(1):e136779. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI136779.
View: Text | PDF | Corrigendum
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

RGS2-mediated translational control mediates cancer cell dormancy and tumor relapse

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Slow-cycling/dormant cancer cells (SCCs) have pivotal roles in driving cancer relapse and drug resistance. A mechanistic explanation for cancer cell dormancy and therapeutic strategies targeting SCCs are necessary to improve patient prognosis, but are limited because of technical challenges to obtaining SCCs. Here, by applying proliferation-sensitive dyes and chemotherapeutics to non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines and patient-derived xenografts, we identified a distinct SCC subpopulation that resembled SCCs in patient tumors. These SCCs displayed major dormancy-like phenotypes and high survival capacity under hostile microenvironments through transcriptional upregulation of regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2). Database analysis revealed RGS2 as a biomarker of retarded proliferation and poor prognosis in NSCLC. We showed that RGS2 caused prolonged translational arrest in SCCs through persistent eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) phosphorylation via proteasome-mediated degradation of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4). Translational activation through RGS2 antagonism or the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, including sildenafil (Viagra), promoted ER stress–induced apoptosis in SCCs in vitro and in vivo under stressed conditions, such as those induced by chemotherapy. Our results suggest that a low-dose chemotherapy and translation-instigating pharmacological intervention in combination is an effective strategy to prevent tumor progression in NSCLC patients after rigorous chemotherapy.

Authors

Jaebeom Cho, Hye-Young Min, Ho Jin Lee, Seung Yeob Hyun, Jeong Yeon Sim, Myungkyung Noh, Su Jung Hwang, Shin-Hyung Park, Hye-Jin Boo, Hyo-Jong Lee, Sungyoul Hong, Rang-Woon Park, Young Kee Shin, Mien-Chie Hung, Ho-Young Lee

×

Figure 1

Isolation of slow-cycling and chemoresistant population in NSCLC cell line and lung PDX samples.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Isolation of slow-cycling and chemoresistant population in NSCLC cell li...
(A) Schematic diagram distinguishing the intrinsic slow-cycling cells (CFSEhi) from the actively cycling cells (CFSElo). (B) Gating strategy of flow cytometry sorting for CFSElo (~10%), CFSEmid (~35%–40%), and CFSEhi (~10%) populations. (C-F) The basal Ki67 positivity (C), mitotic index (D), anchorage-dependent colony formation (E), and resistance to chemotherapy in the anchorage-independent colony formation (F) of CFSEhi cells compared with CFSEmid and CFSElo cells. (G) Delayed tumorigenesis of CFSEhi cells compared with CFSElo cells in NOD/SCID mice (H460 and PDX1-2, n = 5 per group; H1299, SK [SK-MES-1], and PDX1-1, n = 6 per group). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 6 for C; n = 5 for D; n = 3 for E; n = 4 for F. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, as determined by 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (C, D, E, F).

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts