We have segregated DR1+ individuals into two categories according to whether or not their class II+ cells stimulated T lymphocyte clones specific for or restricted to DR1. In a majority of cases (87%), failure to stimulate was a property of cells having the B14;DR1 haplotype and/or nonclassical 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Absence of clonal proliferation could not be explained by release of an intercellular suppressor factor or by stimulator cell absorption of interleukin 2. Homozygous cells inheriting both stimulatory (DR1n) and nonstimulatory (DR1x) haplotypes did not successfully mediate clonal expansion, implying that a trans acting factor operates intracellularly to modify both DR1 alleles or their products. Other DR alleles did not appear to be affected as evidence by normal proliferative responses of T lymphocyte clones restricted to DR2 or DR7 and stimulated by DR1x,2 and DR1x,7 cells, respectively. By two-dimensional gel analysis, we have further identified a 50-kD surface glycoprotein contained in anti-DR immunoprecipitates of DR1x, but not DR1n or non-DR1 cellular lysates. This 50-kD structure had antigenic and peptide identity to DR alpha and beta chains but was resistant to dissociation under conditions that normally separate DR alpha and beta (8 M urea plus 5% 2-mercaptoethanol); boiling in sodium dodecyl sulfate was required to segregate the component polypeptides of the 50-kD heterodimer. We postulate that a product of a novel combinatorial association between constitutive chains of DR may interfere with or compete for normal T cell receptor recognition of DR1 as both an alloantigen and a restricting element. We further propose that gene abnormalities within the class III region of a haplotype associated with nonclassical 21-hydroxylase deficiency may extend into the DR subregion of the major histocompatibility complex with consequent aberrations in DR1 presentation.
J E Davis, R R Rich, M Van, H V Le, M S Pollack, R G Cook
Usage data is cumulative from October 2021 through October 2022.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.