The serum bactericidal activity (SBA) of cirrhotic patients was compared with that of normal individuals using the release of 51Cr from radiolabeled Escherichia coli as the assay method. 80% (22/27) of patients were found to have deficient SBA against at least one of three smooth, serum-sensitive test strains of E. coli. Cirrhotic patients were found to have normal levels of serum lysozyme. Although some patients were mildly hypocomplementemic, this abnormality did not correlate with the presence of a bactericidal defect. Bactericidal antibody in normal and cirrhotics' sera was limited to the immunoglobulin (Ig)M class. Purified IgM from patients with deficient SBA against E. coli 0111 had lower concentrations of bactericidal antibody for that E. coli than did IgM from normal sera; the calculated bactericidal activity of total serum IgM was also lower. The bactericidal defect in cirrhotic serum could be completely corrected by either human antiserum to the homologous strain of E. coli or by purified, normal human IgM. However, because higher concentrations of IgM were required to restore normal SBA to a cirrhotic's serum than to agammaglobulinemic serum, there may be an inhibitor of bactericidal antibody in addition to a deficiency of bactericidal IgM antibody to E. coli in the serum of patients with cirrhosis. The bactericidal activity of the alternative complement pathway was also assessed. Sera from cirrhotic patients had no deficit in SBA attributable to the alternative complement pathway. In fact, in some, the activity of the alternative complement pathway was supernormal, compensating in part for the deficit in IgM-mediated SBA.
Joshua Fierer, Fred Finley
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 140 | 0 |
89 | 20 | |
Scanned page | 259 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 13 | 0 |
Totals | 501 | 22 |
Total Views | 523 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.