A human IgG1 myeloma protein that has a delection in the third constant domain of the heavy chain (Cgamma3) and forms two-chain half-molecules was studied for its in vivo turnover and its ability to fix C1q and hemolytic complement, to bind to human lymphocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes, and to induce a passive cutaneous reaction in guinea pigs. In both man and monkeys, the half-molecule was rapidly catabolized and in part excreted into the urine. The half-life in man was 4.3 days and the fractional turnover 165% per day; 7.6% of the intravascular pool was excreted into the urine per day. Although the 7S four-chain myeloma protein could not be obtained in a pure form, the elimination from the serum of a partially purified preparation suggested that it was also rapidly catabolized. The unaggregated half-molecule neither formed complexes with C1q, cound to human lymphocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes, nor elicited a reverse passive cutaneous reaction in guinea pigs. In contrast, the aggregated half-molecule fixed hemolytic complement and bound to the human white cells similarly to an intact IgG1 myeloma protein. In order to explain the biological activities of this half-moleculr, it is postulated that IgG1 may have several (at least two) submolecular sites for a given biological activity that are localized on both the Cgamma2 and Cgamma3 domains. Proteins having both sites would be capable of binding to C1q and Fc cell receptors in unaggregated in order to obtain half-molecule, must be aggregated in order to obtain this binding.
H L Spiegelberg
Usage data is cumulative from March 2023 through March 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 56 | 0 |
39 | 14 | |
Scanned page | 76 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 9 | 0 |
Totals | 180 | 14 |
Total Views | 194 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.