Five-year follow-up after clinical islet transplantation

EA Ryan, BW Paty, PA Senior, D Bigam, E Alfadhli… - Diabetes, 2005 - Am Diabetes Assoc
EA Ryan, BW Paty, PA Senior, D Bigam, E Alfadhli, NM Kneteman, JRT Lakey, AMJ Shapiro
Diabetes, 2005Am Diabetes Assoc
Islet transplantation can restore endogenous β-cell function to subjects with type 1 diabetes.
Sixty-five patients received an islet transplant in Edmonton as of 1 November 2004. Their
mean age was 42.9±1.2 years, their mean duration of diabetes was 27.1±1.3 years, and
57% were women. The main indication was problematic hypoglycemia. Forty-four patients
completed the islet transplant as defined by insulin independence, and three further patients
received> 16,000 islet equivalents (IE)/kg but remained on insulin and are deemed …
Islet transplantation can restore endogenous β-cell function to subjects with type 1 diabetes. Sixty-five patients received an islet transplant in Edmonton as of 1 November 2004. Their mean age was 42.9 ± 1.2 years, their mean duration of diabetes was 27.1 ± 1.3 years, and 57% were women. The main indication was problematic hypoglycemia. Forty-four patients completed the islet transplant as defined by insulin independence, and three further patients received >16,000 islet equivalents (IE)/kg but remained on insulin and are deemed complete. Those who became insulin independent received a total of 799,912 ± 30,220 IE (11,910 ± 469 IE/kg). Five subjects became insulin independent after one transplant. Fifty-two patients had two transplants, and 11 subjects had three transplants. In the completed patients, 5-year follow-up reveals that the majority (∼80%) have C-peptide present post–islet transplant, but only a minority (∼10%) maintain insulin independence. The median duration of insulin independence was 15 months (interquartile range 6.2–25.5). The HbA1c (A1C) level was well controlled in those off insulin (6.4% [6.1–6.7]) and in those back on insulin but C-peptide positive (6.7% [5.9–7.5]) and higher in those who lost all graft function (9.0% [6.7–9.3]) (P < 0.05). Those who resumed insulin therapy did not appear more insulin resistant compared with those off insulin and required half their pretransplant daily dose of insulin but had a lower increment of C-peptide to a standard meal challenge (0.44 ± 0.06 vs. 0.76 ± 0.06 nmol/l, P < 0.001). The Hypoglycemic score and lability index both improved significantly posttransplant. In the 128 procedures performed, bleeding occurred in 15 and branch portal vein thrombosis in 5 subjects. Complications of immunosuppressive therapy included mouth ulcers, diarrhea, anemia, and ovarian cysts. Of the 47 completed patients, 4 required retinal laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy and 5 patients with microalbuminuria developed macroproteinuria. The need for multiple antihypertensive medications increased from 6% pretransplant to 42% posttransplant, while the use of statin therapy increased from 23 to 83% posttransplant. There was no change in the neurothesiometer scores pre- versus posttransplant. In conclusion, islet transplantation can relieve glucose instability and problems with hypoglycemia. C-peptide secretion was maintained in the majority of subjects for up to 5 years, although most reverted to using some insulin. The results, though promising, still point to the need for further progress in the availability of transplantable islets, improving islet engraftment, preserving islet function, and reducing toxic immunosuppression.
Am Diabetes Assoc