Role of cerebellar interpositus nucleus in the genesis and control of reflex and conditioned eyelid responses

L Jiménez-Díaz, J de Dios Navarro-López… - Journal of …, 2004 - Soc Neuroscience
L Jiménez-Díaz, J de Dios Navarro-López, A Gruart, JM Delgado-García
Journal of Neuroscience, 2004Soc Neuroscience
The role of cerebellar circuits in the acquisition of new motor abilities is still a matter of
intensive debate. To establish the contribution of posterior interpositus nucleus (PIN) to the
performance and/or acquisition of reflex and classically conditioned responses (CRs) of the
eyelid, the effects of microstimulation and/or pharmacological inhibition by muscimol of the
nucleus were investigated in conscious cats. Microstimulation of the PIN in naive animals
evoked ramp-like eyelid responses with a wavy appearance, without producing any …
The role of cerebellar circuits in the acquisition of new motor abilities is still a matter of intensive debate. To establish the contribution of posterior interpositus nucleus (PIN) to the performance and/or acquisition of reflex and classically conditioned responses (CRs) of the eyelid, the effects of microstimulation and/or pharmacological inhibition by muscimol of the nucleus were investigated in conscious cats. Microstimulation of the PIN in naive animals evoked ramp-like eyelid responses with a wavy appearance, without producing any noticeable plastic functional change in the cerebellar and brainstem circuits involved. Muscimol microinjections decreased the amplitude of reflex eyeblinks evoked by air puffs, both when presented alone or when paired with a tone as conditioned stimulus (CS). In half-conditioned animals, muscimol injections also decreased the amplitude and damped the typical wavy profile of CRs, whereas microstimulation of the same sites increased both parameters. However, neither muscimol injections nor microstimulation modified the expected percentage of CRs, suggesting a major role of the PIN in the performance of eyelid responses rather than in the learning process. Moreover, the simultaneous presentation of CS and microstimulation in well trained animals evoked CRs similar in amplitude to the added value of those evoked by the two stimuli presented separately. In contrast, muscimol-injected animals developed CRs to paired CS and microstimulation presentations, larger than those evoked by the two stimuli when presented alone. It is concluded that the PIN contributes to the enhancement of both reflex and conditioned eyelid responses and to the damping of resonant properties of neuromuscular elements controlling eyelid kinematics.
Soc Neuroscience