Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American …

DM Nathan, JB Buse, MB Davidson, RJ Heine… - Diabetes …, 2006 - Am Diabetes Assoc
DM Nathan, JB Buse, MB Davidson, RJ Heine, RR Holman, R Sherwin, B Zinman
Diabetes care, 2006Am Diabetes Assoc
The epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the latter part of the 20th and in the early 21st century,
and the recognition that achieving specific glycemic goals can substantially reduce
morbidity, have made the effective treatment of hyperglycemia a top priority (1–3). While the
management of hyperglycemia, the hallmark metabolic abnormality associated with type 2
diabetes, has historically had center stage in the treatment of diabetes, therapies directed at
other coincident features, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, hypercoagulability, obesity …
The epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the latter part of the 20th and in the early 21st century, and the recognition that achieving specific glycemic goals can substantially reduce morbidity, have made the effective treatment of hyperglycemia a top priority (1–3). While the management of hyperglycemia, the hallmark metabolic abnormality associated with type 2 diabetes, has historically had center stage in the treatment of diabetes, therapies directed at other coincident features, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, hypercoagulability, obesity, and insulin resistance, have also been a major focus of research and therapy. Maintaining glycemic levels as close to the nondiabetic range as possible has been demonstrated to have a powerful beneficial impact on diabetes-specific complications, including retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in the setting of type 1 diabetes (4, 5); in type 2 diabetes, more intensive treatment strategies have likewise been demonstrated to reduce complications (6–8). Intensive glycemic management resulting in lower HbA1c (A1C) levels has also been shown to have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications in type 1 diabetes (9, 10); however, the role of intensive diabetes therapy on CVD in type 2 diabetes remains under active investigation (11, 12). Some therapies directed at lowering glucose levels have additional benefits with regard to CVD risk factors, while others lower glucose without additional benefits.
The development of new classes of blood glucose–lowering medications to supplement the older therapies, such as lifestyle-directed interventions, insulin, sulfonylureas, and metformin, has increased the treatment options for type 2 diabetes. Whether used alone or in combination with other blood glucose–lowering interventions, the availability of the newer agents has provided an increased number of choices for practitioners and patients and heightened uncertainty regarding the most appropriate means of treating this widespread disease. Although numerous reviews on the management of type 2 diabetes have been published in recent years (13–16), practitioners are often left without a clear pathway of therapy to follow. We developed the following consensus approach to the management of hyperglycemia in the nonpregnant adult to help guide health care providers in choosing the most appropriate interventions for their patients with type 2 diabetes.
Am Diabetes Assoc