Adverse Effect of Adjuvant Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Breast Cancer with Cyclin D1 Gene Amplification

K Jirström, M Stendahl, L Rydén, A Kronblad… - Cancer research, 2005 - AACR
K Jirström, M Stendahl, L Rydén, A Kronblad, PO Bendahl, O Stål, G Landberg…
Cancer research, 2005AACR
Cyclins D1 and A2 are cell cycle regulators that also have the ability to interact with the
estrogen receptor (ER) and consequently interfere with antiestrogen treatment in breast
cancer. Experimental data support this concept, but the clinical relevance needs to be further
established. In this study, we evaluated cyclin D1 and A2 protein expression by
immunohistochemistry and cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) amplification by fluorescence in situ
hybridization in 500 primary breast cancers arranged in tissue microarrays. Patients had …
Abstract
Cyclins D1 and A2 are cell cycle regulators that also have the ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER) and consequently interfere with antiestrogen treatment in breast cancer. Experimental data support this concept, but the clinical relevance needs to be further established. In this study, we evaluated cyclin D1 and A2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry and cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 500 primary breast cancers arranged in tissue microarrays. Patients had been randomized to 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen or no treatment with a median follow-up of 14 years, allowing for subgroup analysis of treatment response defined by cyclin status. We found that both cyclin D1 and A2 protein overexpression was associated with an impaired tamoxifen response, although not significant in multivariate interaction analyses, whereas tamoxifen-treated patients with CCND1-amplified tumors had a substantially increased risk for disease recurrence after tamoxifen treatment in univariate analyses [relative risk (RR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.94-5.26; P = 0.06] in contrast to nonamplified tumors (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.65; P < 0.0001). Consequently, a highly significant interaction between tamoxifen treatment and CCND1 amplification could be shown regarding both recurrence-free survival (RR, 6.38; 95% CI, 2.29-17.78; P < 0.001) and overall survival (RR, 5.34; 95% CI, 1.84-15.51; P = 0.002), suggesting an agonistic effect of tamoxifen in ER-positive tumors. In node-positive patients, the disparate outcome according to gene amplification status was even more accentuated. In summary, our data implicate that despite a significant correlation to cyclin D1 protein expression, amplification status of the CCND1 gene seems a strong independent predictor of tamoxifen response, and possibly agonism, in premenopausal breast cancer.
AACR