ATP‐dependent paracrine communication between enteric neurons and glia in a primary cell culture derived from embryonic mice

P Gomes, J Chevalier, W Boesmans… - …, 2009 - Wiley Online Library
P Gomes, J Chevalier, W Boesmans, L Roosen, V Van Den Abbeel, M Neunlist, J Tack…
Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 2009Wiley Online Library
The importance of dynamic interactions between glia and neurons is increasingly
recognized, both in the central and enteric nervous system. However, apart from their
protective role, little is known about enteric neuro–glia interaction. The aim was to
investigate neuro–glia intercellular communication in a mouse culture model using optical
techniques. Complete embryonic (E13) guts were enzymatically dissociated, seeded on
coverslips and studied with immunohistochemistry and Ca2+‐imaging. Putative progenitor …
Abstract
The importance of dynamic interactions between glia and neurons is increasingly recognized, both in the central and enteric nervous system. However, apart from their protective role, little is known about enteric neuro–glia interaction. The aim was to investigate neuro–glia intercellular communication in a mouse culture model using optical techniques. Complete embryonic (E13) guts were enzymatically dissociated, seeded on coverslips and studied with immunohistochemistry and Ca2+‐imaging. Putative progenitor‐like cells (expressing both PGP9.5 and S‐100) differentiated over approximately 5 days into glia or neurons expressing typical cell‐specific markers. The glia–neuron ratio could be manipulated by specific supplements (N2, G5). Neurons and glia were functionally identified both by their Ca2+‐response to either depolarization (high K+) or lysophosphatidic acid and by the expression of typical markers. Neurons responded to ACh, DMPP, 5‐HT, ATP and electrical stimulation, while glia responded to ATP and ADPβs. Inhibition of glial responses by MRS2179 suggests involvement of P2Y1 receptors. Neuronal stimulation also caused delayed glial responses, which were reduced by suramin and by exogenous apyrases that catalyse nucleotide breakdown. Conversely, glial responses were enhanced by ARL‐67156, an ecto‐ATPase inhibitor. In this mouse enteric co‐culture, functional glia and neurons can be easily monitored using optical techniques. Glial cells can be activated directly by ATP or ADPβs. Activation of neuronal cells (DMPP, K+) causes secondary responses in glial cells, which can be modulated by tuning ATP and ADP breakdown. This strongly supports the involvement of paracrine purinergic communication between enteric neurons and glia.
Wiley Online Library