Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention

R Desimone, J Duncan - Annual review of neuroscience, 1995 - annualreviews.org
Annual review of neuroscience, 1995annualreviews.org
The two basic phenomena that define the problem of visual attention can be illustrated in a
simple example. Consider the arrays shown in each panel of Figure 1. In a typical
experiment, before the arrays were presented, subjects would be asked to report letters
appearing in one color (targets, here black letters), and to disregard letters in the other color
(nontargets, here white letters). The array would then be briefly flashed, and the subjects,
without any opportunity for eye movements, would give their report. The display mimics our …
The two basic phenomena that define the problem of visual attention can be illustrated in a simple example. Consider the arrays shown in each panel of Figure 1. In a typical experiment, before the arrays were presented, subjects would be asked to report letters appearing in one color (targets, here black letters), and to disregard letters in the other color (nontargets, here white letters). The array would then be briefly flashed, and the subjects, without any opportunity for eye movements, would give their report. The display mimics our. usual cluttered visual environment: It contains one or more objects that are relevant to current behavior, along with others that are irrelevant. The first basic phenomenon is limited capacity for processing information. At any given time, only a small amount of the information available on the retina can be processed and used in the control of behavior. Subjectively, giving attention to any one target leaves less available for others. In Figure 1, the probability of reporting the target letter N is much lower with two accompa nying targets (Figure la) than with none (Figure Ib). The second basic phenomenon is selectivity-the ability to filter out un wanted information. Subjectively, one is aware of attended stimuli and largely unaware of unattended ones. Correspondingly, accuracy in identifying an attended stimulus may be independent of the number of nontargets in a display (Figure la vs Ie)(see Bundesen 1990, Duncan 1980).
Annual Reviews