Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer

J Lapointe, C Li, JP Higgins… - Proceedings of the …, 2004 - National Acad Sciences
J Lapointe, C Li, JP Higgins, M Van De Rijn, E Bair, K Montgomery, M Ferrari, L Egevad…
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004National Acad Sciences
Prostate cancer, a leading cause of cancer death, displays a broad range of clinical
behavior from relatively indolent to aggressive metastatic disease. To explore potential
molecular variation underlying this clinical heterogeneity, we profiled gene expression in 62
primary prostate tumors, as well as 41 normal prostate specimens and nine lymph node
metastases, using cDNA microarrays containing≈ 26,000 genes. Unsupervised hierarchical
clustering readily distinguished tumors from normal samples, and further identified three …
Prostate cancer, a leading cause of cancer death, displays a broad range of clinical behavior from relatively indolent to aggressive metastatic disease. To explore potential molecular variation underlying this clinical heterogeneity, we profiled gene expression in 62 primary prostate tumors, as well as 41 normal prostate specimens and nine lymph node metastases, using cDNA microarrays containing ≈26,000 genes. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering readily distinguished tumors from normal samples, and further identified three subclasses of prostate tumors based on distinct patterns of gene expression. High-grade and advanced stage tumors, as well as tumors associated with recurrence, were disproportionately represented among two of the three subtypes, one of which also included most lymph node metastases. To further characterize the clinical relevance of tumor subtypes, we evaluated as surrogate markers two genes differentially expressed among tumor subgroups by using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays representing an independent set of 225 prostate tumors. Positive staining for MUC1, a gene highly expressed in the subgroups with “aggressive” clinicopathological features, was associated with an elevated risk of recurrence (P = 0.003), whereas strong staining for AZGP1, a gene highly expressed in the other subgroup, was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence (P = 0.0008). In multivariate analysis, MUC1 and AZGP1 staining were strong predictors of tumor recurrence independent of tumor grade, stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels. Our results suggest that prostate tumors can be usefully classified according to their gene expression patterns, and these tumor subtypes may provide a basis for improved prognostication and treatment stratification.
National Acad Sciences