Weaning of immunosuppression in living donor liver transplant recipients1

M Takatsuki, S Uemoto, Y Inomata, H Egawa… - …, 2001 - journals.lww.com
M Takatsuki, S Uemoto, Y Inomata, H Egawa, T Kiuchi, S Fujita, M Hayashi, T Kanematsu…
Transplantation, 2001journals.lww.com
Background. Some reported studies have indicated the possibility of immunosuppression
withdrawal in cadaveric liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
possibility and feasibility of weaning living donor liver transplant recipients from
immunosuppression. Methods. From June of 1990 to October of 1999, 63 patients were
considered to be weaned from immunosuppression. They consisted of 26 electively weaned
patients and 37 either forcibly or incidentally weaned patients (nonelective weaning) due to …
Abstract
Background.
Some reported studies have indicated the possibility of immunosuppression withdrawal in cadaveric liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility and feasibility of weaning living donor liver transplant recipients from immunosuppression.
Methods.
From June of 1990 to October of 1999, 63 patients were considered to be weaned from immunosuppression. They consisted of 26 electively weaned patients and 37 either forcibly or incidentally weaned patients (nonelective weaning) due to various causes but mainly due to infection. Regarding elective weaning, we gradually reduced the frequency of tacrolimus administration for patients who survived more than 2 years after transplantation, maintained a good graft function, and had no rejection episodes in the preceding 12 months. The frequency of administration was reduced from the conventional bid until the start of weaning to qd, 4 times a week, 3 times a week, twice a week, once a week, twice a month, once a month, and finally, the patients were completely weaned off with each weaning period lasting from 3 to 6 months. The reduction method of nonelective weaning depended on the clinical course of each individual case. When the patients were clinically diagnosed to develop rejection during weaning, then such patients were treated by a reintroduction of tacrolimus or an additional steroid bolus when indicated.
Results.
Twenty-four patients (38.1%) achieved a complete withdrawal of tacrolimus with a median drug-free period of 23.5 months (range, 3–69 months). Twenty-three patients (36.5%) are still being weaned at various stages. Sixteen patients (25.4%) encountered rejection while weaning at median period of 9.5 months (range, 1–63 months) from the start of weaning. All 16 were easily treated with the reintroduction of tacrolimus or additional steroid bolus therapy.
Conclusions.
We were able to achieve a complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in some selected patients. Although the mechanism of graft acceptance in these patients has yet to be elucidated, we believe that a majority of long-term patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation may, thus, be potential candidates to be successfully weaned from immunosuppression.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins