Although a large body of data on mobilization have yielded valuable clues, the mechanism(s) dictating egress of stem/progenitor cells during baseline hematopoiesis and after their mobilization are poorly understood. We have previously provided functional in vivo evidence that cytoadhesion molecules, specifically the β₁integrins, are involved in mobilization; however, the mechanism by which this was achieved was unclear. To provide further insights into the anti–very late antigen 4 (VLA4)/anti–vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1)—induced mobilization, we used these antibodies to treat mutant mice with compromised growth factor receptor function. We found that mobilization by anti-VLA4 does not depend on a functional granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-7 (IL-7), or IL-3α receptor. By contrast, the functional kit receptor is required, because W/W^v mice responded minimally, whereas Steel-Dickie (Sl/Sl^d) responded normally. Both W^v and Sl/Sl^d mice did not respond to anti–VCAM-1 treatment, in contrast to their +/+ littermates and despite normal levels of VCAM-1 expression in bone marrow cells. The defective response to anti–VCAM-1 in W/W^v mice was corrected after their transplantation with +/+ cells. me^v/me^v mice showed increased numbers of circulating progenitors before treatment and a heightened response after anti-VLA4 or anti–VCAM-1 treatment. Downmodulation of kit expression was detected in normal bone marrow cells after anti-VLA4 treatment. On the strength of the above findings we conclude that (1) anti–VLA4/VCAM-1—induced mobilization likely requires signaling for stimulation of cell migration; (2) this cooperative signaling involves the kit/kit ligand pathway, and provides a novel example of integrin/cytokine crosstalk; and (3) migration mediated through the kit/kit ligand pathway may be a common contributor to different mobilization stimuli. Dissection of the exact molecular pathways that lead to mobilization remains a future challenge.