[HTML][HTML] Prevention of rectal SHIV transmission in macaques by daily or intermittent prophylaxis with emtricitabine and tenofovir

JG García-Lerma, RA Otten, SH Qari, E Jackson… - PLoS …, 2008 - journals.plos.org
JG García-Lerma, RA Otten, SH Qari, E Jackson, M Cong, S Masciotra, W Luo, C Kim…
PLoS medicine, 2008journals.plos.org
Background In the absence of an effective vaccine, HIV continues to spread globally,
emphasizing the need for novel strategies to limit its transmission. Pre-exposure prophylaxis
(PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs could prove to be an effective intervention strategy if highly
efficacious and cost-effective PrEP modalities are identified. We evaluated daily and
intermittent PrEP regimens of increasing antiviral activity in a macaque model that closely
resembles human transmission. Methods and Findings We used a repeat-exposure …
Background
In the absence of an effective vaccine, HIV continues to spread globally, emphasizing the need for novel strategies to limit its transmission. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs could prove to be an effective intervention strategy if highly efficacious and cost-effective PrEP modalities are identified. We evaluated daily and intermittent PrEP regimens of increasing antiviral activity in a macaque model that closely resembles human transmission.
Methods and Findings
We used a repeat-exposure macaque model with 14 weekly rectal virus challenges. Three drug treatments were given once daily, each to a different group of six rhesus macaques. Group 1 was treated subcutaneously with a human-equivalent dose of emtricitabine (FTC), group 2 received orally the human-equivalent dosing of both FTC and tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and group 3 received subcutaneously a similar dosing of FTC and a higher dose of tenofovir. A fourth group of six rhesus macaques (group 4) received intermittently a PrEP regimen similar to group 3 only 2 h before and 24 h after each weekly virus challenge. Results were compared to 18 control macaques that did not receive any drug treatment. The risk of infection in macaques treated in groups 1 and 2 was 3.8- and 7.8-fold lower than in untreated macaques (p = 0.02 and p = 0.008, respectively). All six macaques in group 3 were protected. Breakthrough infections had blunted acute viremias; drug resistance was seen in two of six animals. All six animals in group 4 that received intermittent PrEP were protected.
Conclusions
This model suggests that single drugs for daily PrEP can be protective but a combination of antiretroviral drugs may be required to increase the level of protection. Short but potent intermittent PrEP can provide protection comparable to that of daily PrEP in this SHIV/macaque model. These findings support PrEP trials for HIV prevention in humans and identify promising PrEP modalities.
PLOS