Cancer stem cells: are we missing the target?

RJ Jones, WH Matsui, BD Smith - Journal of the National …, 2004 - academic.oup.com
RJ Jones, WH Matsui, BD Smith
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004academic.oup.com
Most conventional anticancer agents are nonselective cellular poisons with broad activities
against most dividing cells, regardless of whether they are malignant or not; any preferential
effects of these agents on cancer cells usually reflect their relatively high rates of cell
division. The widely acclaimed success of imatinib mesylate (also known as STI571 or
Gleevec, and herein referred to as imatinib) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) highlights
the enormous possibilities that the development of drugs directed against cancer-specific …
Most conventional anticancer agents are nonselective cellular poisons with broad activities against most dividing cells, regardless of whether they are malignant or not; any preferential effects of these agents on cancer cells usually reflect their relatively high rates of cell division. The widely acclaimed success of imatinib mesylate (also known as STI571 or Gleevec, and herein referred to as imatinib) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) highlights the enormous possibilities that the development of drugs directed against cancer-specific targets has for improving cancer treatment. Targeted anticancer agents have the potential to favorably influence patient survival by decreasing toxicity and improving disease control. However, recent laboratory and clinical data raise questions about whether new anticancer agents will effectively target relevant subsets of cancer cells. These issues have implications for interpreting results of clinical studies with targeted therapies as well as for the future development of new anticancer treatments.
Oxford University Press