Sample size calculations for population‐and family‐based case‐control association studies on marker genotypes

RM Pfeiffer, MH Gail - Genetic Epidemiology: The Official …, 2003 - Wiley Online Library
RM Pfeiffer, MH Gail
Genetic Epidemiology: The Official Publication of the …, 2003Wiley Online Library
Most previous sample size calculations for case-control studies to detect genetic
associations with disease assumed that the disease gene locus is known, whereas, in fact,
markers are used. We calculated sample sizes for unmatched case-control and sibling case-
control studies to detect an association between a biallelic marker and a disease governed
by a putative biallelic disease locus. Required sample sizes increase with increasing
discrepancy between the marker and disease allele frequencies, and with less-than …
Abstract
Most previous sample size calculations for case-control studies to detect genetic associations with disease assumed that the disease gene locus is known, whereas, in fact, markers are used. We calculated sample sizes for unmatched case-control and sibling case-control studies to detect an association between a biallelic marker and a disease governed by a putative biallelic disease locus. Required sample sizes increase with increasing discrepancy between the marker and disease allele frequencies, and with less-than-maximal linkage disequilibrium between the marker and disease alleles. Qualitatively similar results were found for studies of parent offspring triads based on the transmission disequilibrium test (Abel and Müller-Myhsok, 1998, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63: 664–667; Tu and Whittemore, 1999, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64: 641–649). We also studied other factors affecting required sample size, including attributable risk for the disease allele, inheritance mechanism, disease prevalence, and for sibling case-control designs, extragenetic familial aggregation of disease and recombination. The large sample-size requirements represent a formidable challenge to studies of this type. Genet Epidemiol 25: 136–148, 2003. Published 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Wiley Online Library