Insulin dose-response curves for stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake and suppression of endogenous glucose production differ in nondiabetic humans and are …

R Basu, A Basu, CM Johnson, WF Schwenk… - Diabetes, 2004 - Am Diabetes Assoc
R Basu, A Basu, CM Johnson, WF Schwenk, RA Rizza
Diabetes, 2004Am Diabetes Assoc
To determine whether the insulin dose-response curves for suppression of endogenous
glucose production (EGP) and stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU) differ in
nondiabetic humans and are abnormal in type 2 diabetes, 14 nondiabetic and 12 diabetic
subjects were studied. Glucose was clamped at∼ 9.5 mmol/l and endogenous hormone
secretion inhibited by somatostatin, while glucagon and growth hormone were replaced by
an exogenous infusion. Insulin was progressively increased from∼ 150 to∼ 350 and∼ 700 …
To determine whether the insulin dose-response curves for suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) and stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU) differ in nondiabetic humans and are abnormal in type 2 diabetes, 14 nondiabetic and 12 diabetic subjects were studied. Glucose was clamped at ∼9.5 mmol/l and endogenous hormone secretion inhibited by somatostatin, while glucagon and growth hormone were replaced by an exogenous infusion. Insulin was progressively increased from ∼150 to ∼350 and ∼700 pmol/l by means of an exogenous insulin infusion, while EGP, SGU, and leg glucose uptake (LGU) were measured using the splanchnic and leg catheterization methods, combined with a [3-3H]glucose infusion. In nondiabetic subjects, an increase in insulin from ∼150 to ∼350 pmol/l resulted in maximal suppression of EGP, whereas SGU continued to increase (P < 0.001) when insulin was increased to ∼700 pmol/l. In contrast, EGP progressively decreased (P < 0.001) and SGU progressively increased (P < 0.001) in the diabetic subjects as insulin increased from ∼150 to ∼700 pmol/l. Although EGP was higher (P < 0.01) in the diabetic than nondiabetic subjects only at the lowest insulin concentration, SGU was lower (P < 0.01) in the diabetic subjects at all insulin concentrations tested. On the other hand, in contrast to LGU and overall glucose disposal, the increment in SGU in response to both increments in insulin did not differ in the diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, implying a right shifted but parallel dose-response curve. These data indicate that the dose-response curves for suppression of glucose production and stimulation of glucose uptake differ in nondiabetic subjects and are abnormal in people with type 2 diabetes. Taken together, these data also suggest that agents that enhance SGU in diabetic patients (e.g. glucokinase activators) are likely to improve glucose tolerance.
Am Diabetes Assoc