[HTML][HTML] Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent–induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine

M Tepel, M Van Der Giet, C Schwarzfeld… - … England Journal of …, 2000 - Mass Medical Soc
M Tepel, M Van Der Giet, C Schwarzfeld, U Laufer, D Liermann, W Zidek
New England Journal of Medicine, 2000Mass Medical Soc
Background Radiographic contrast agents can cause a reduction in renal function that may
be due to reactive oxygen species. Whether the reduction can be prevented by the
administration of antioxidants is unknown. Methods We prospectively studied 83 patients
with chronic renal insufficiency (mean [±SD] serum creatinine concentration, 2.4±1.3 mg per
deciliter [216±116 μmol per liter]) who were undergoing computed tomography with
iopromide, a nonionic, low-osmolality contrast agent. Patients were randomly assigned …
Background
Radiographic contrast agents can cause a reduction in renal function that may be due to reactive oxygen species. Whether the reduction can be prevented by the administration of antioxidants is unknown.
Methods
We prospectively studied 83 patients with chronic renal insufficiency (mean [±SD] serum creatinine concentration, 2.4±1.3 mg per deciliter [216± 116 μmol per liter]) who were undergoing computed tomography with iopromide, a nonionic, low-osmolality contrast agent. Patients were randomly assigned either to receive the antioxidant acetylcysteine (600 mg orally twice daily) and 0.45 percent saline intravenously, before and after administration of the contrast agent, or to receive placebo and saline.
Results
Ten of the 83 patients (12 percent) had an increase of at least 0.5 mg per deciliter (44 μmol per liter) in the serum creatinine concentration 48 hours after administration of the contrast agent: 1 of the 41 patients in the acetylcysteine group (2 percent) and 9 of the 42 patients in the control group (21 percent; P=0.01; relative risk, 0.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.9). In the acetylcysteine group, the mean serum creatinine concentration decreased significantly (P<0.001), from 2.5±1.3 to 2.1±1.3 mg per deciliter (220±118 to 186±112 μmol per liter) 48 hours after the administration of the contrast medium, whereas in the control group, the mean serum creatinine concentration increased nonsignificantly (P=0.18), from 2.4±1.3 to 2.6±1.5 mg per deciliter (212±114 to 226± 133 μmol per liter) (P<0.001 for the comparison between groups).
Conclusions
Prophylactic oral administration of the antioxidant acetylcysteine, along with hydration, prevents the reduction in renal function induced by iopromide, a nonionic, low-osmolality contrast agent, in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
The New England Journal Of Medicine