Molecular evolution of breast cancer

PT Simpson, JS Reis‐Filho, T Gale… - The Journal of …, 2005 - Wiley Online Library
PT Simpson, JS Reis‐Filho, T Gale, SR Lakhani
The Journal of Pathology: A Journal of the Pathological Society of …, 2005Wiley Online Library
Molecular analysis of invasive breast cancer and its precursors has furthered our
understanding of breast cancer progression. In the past few years, new multi‐step pathways
of breast cancer progression have been delineated through genotypic–phenotypic
correlations. Nuclear grade, more than any other pathological feature, is strongly associated
with the number and pattern of molecular genetic abnormalities in breast cancer cells. Thus,
there are two distinct major pathways to the evolution of low‐and high‐grade invasive …
Abstract
Molecular analysis of invasive breast cancer and its precursors has furthered our understanding of breast cancer progression. In the past few years, new multi‐step pathways of breast cancer progression have been delineated through genotypic–phenotypic correlations. Nuclear grade, more than any other pathological feature, is strongly associated with the number and pattern of molecular genetic abnormalities in breast cancer cells. Thus, there are two distinct major pathways to the evolution of low‐ and high‐grade invasive carcinomas: whilst the former consistently show oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) positivity and 16q loss, the latter are usually ER/PgR‐negative and show Her‐2 overexpression/amplification and complex karyotypes. The boundaries between the evolutionary pathways of well‐differentiated/low‐grade ductal and lobular carcinomas have been blurred, with changes in E‐cadherin expression being one of the few distinguishing features between the two. In addition, lesions long thought to be precursors of breast carcinomas, such as hyperplasia of usual type, are currently considered mere risk indicators, whilst columnar cell lesions are now implicated as non‐obligate precursors of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and well‐differentiated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, only through the combination of comprehensive morphological analysis and cutting‐edge molecular tools can this knowledge be translated into clinical practice and patient management. Copyright © 2005 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Wiley Online Library