Apolipoprotein E modulates low density lipoprotein retention by lipoprotein lipase anchored to the subendothelial matrix

U Saxena, E Ferguson, CL Bisgaier - Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1993 - Elsevier
U Saxena, E Ferguson, CL Bisgaier
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1993Elsevier
Lipoprotein lipase (lipase), a key enzyme in lipoprotein triglyceride metabolism, has been
shown to markedly increase low density lipoprotein (LDL) retention by subendothelial
matrix. In the present study we assessed the role that lipoprotein and matrix components
play in retention of LDL by lipase anchored to the subendothelial matrix. Lipase addition to
subendothelial matrix increased LDL retention by 66-fold. Scatchard analysis of LDL binding
to lipase-containing matrix yielded an association constant of 12 nM. Exogenous addition of …
Lipoprotein lipase (lipase), a key enzyme in lipoprotein triglyceride metabolism, has been shown to markedly increase low density lipoprotein (LDL) retention by subendothelial matrix. In the present study we assessed the role that lipoprotein and matrix components play in retention of LDL by lipase anchored to the subendothelial matrix. Lipase addition to subendothelial matrix increased LDL retention by 66-fold. Scatchard analysis of LDL binding to lipase-containing matrix yielded an association constant of 12 nM. Exogenous addition of the matrix components, heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate (i.e. chondroitin sulfate B), reduced LDL retention by greater than 90%. These glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) also reduced lipolytic activity associated with the matrix, suggesting that lipase was released from its binding sites on the matrix. In contrast, other matrix components (collagen, fibronectin, vitronectin, and chondroitin sulfate A) neither affected LDL release nor matrix lipolytic activity. Thus, heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate function to anchor lipase to the subendothelial cell matrix. The effects of apolipoprotein E (apoE) and apoA-I were also examined. Preincubation of the subendothelial matrix with apoE, followed by washing, did not affect subsequent lipase binding to the matrix nor its ability to retain LDL. However, the direct addition of apoE alone or in combination with phospholipid liposomes decreased lipase-mediated LDL retention in a concentration-dependent fashion. Addition of apoA-I had no effect. Thus, in these studies apoE functions to displace LDL bound to lipase, but not lipase anchored to the matrix. To further examine the physiologic implications of this process, we assessed the ability of human apoE-rich and apoE-poor high density lipoproteins (HDL) to displace LDL from matrix-anchored lipase. ApoE-rich HDL reduced LDL retention dramatically (86% at 2.5 micrograms/ml). In contrast, apoE-poor HDL, at the highest concentration evaluated (400 micrograms/ml), decreased LDL retention by only 32%. Overall, these data suggest apoE and specifically apoE-containing HDL reduce the lipase-mediated retention of LDL by subendothelial matrix. This observation, in part could explain the protective effects of apoE and apoE-containing HDL against atherosclerosis.
Elsevier