Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
P.K. Epling-Burnette, Jin Hong Liu, Robyn Catlett-Falcone, James Turkson, Marc Oshiro, Ravi Kothapalli, Yongxiang Li, Ju-Ming Wang, Hsin-Fang Yang-Yen, James Karras, Richard Jove, Thomas P. Loughran
Published in Volume 107, Issue 3
J Clin Invest. 2001; 107(3):351–362 doi:10.1172/JCI9940
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1

Activation of STAT3 and STAT1 in leukemic LGLs. (a) EMSA with nuclear extracts from PBMCs of normal donors (NL), from normal donors activated for 7 days with PHA + IL-2 (NL-AC), and from patients with LGL leukemia (LGL). Cytoplasmic extracts from each sample were run on an SDS-PAGE gel and blotted for expression of STAT3. (b) EMSA supershift or blocking experiments with untreated (lanes 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13), anti-STAT1–preincubated (lanes 2, 5, 8, 11, and 14), and anti-STAT3–preincubated (lanes 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15) reaction mixtures. (c) Western blot analysis of whole-cell extracts for phosphorylated STAT3, total STAT3, and β-actin. (d) EMSA for STAT5-DNA–binding activity with activated normal and leukemic LGLs (10024-AC) used as a positive control. The relative migration of STAT3:3 homodimers (ST3:3), STAT1:3 heterodimers (ST1:3), and STAT1:1 homodimers (ST1:1) is shown in a and b. (d) STAT5:5 homodimers (ST5:5) and STAT1:1 homodimers (ST1:1) are indicated. WB, Western blot.