Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Hideko Kasahara, Bora Lee, Jean-Jacques Schott, D. Woodrow Benson, J.G. Seidman, Christine E. Seidman, Seigo Izumo
Published in Volume 106, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2000; 106(2):299–308 doi:10.1172/JCI9860
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4

DNA binding affinity of the group 3 and 4 mutant proteins versus wild-type CSX/NKX2.5. Sequence of the native –242 bp site (top) and a mutated –242 bp binding site (bottom) in the ANF promoter. EMSA of group 3 (M198 and M259) and group 4 (M25, the mutation site is marked with an asterisk) protein compared with that of the wild-type CSX/NKX2.5. Proteins were mixed with probes containing either tandemly repeated binding sites (ad) or single binding site (eh). Lanes showing similar monomer/dimer ratios are indicated with asterisks in the top panels (ad). In all three mutant proteins, binding affinity as a dimer is reduced approximately 3- to 32 fold (bd versus a), whereas they show similar DNA binding affinity as wild-type to the single binding site (fh versus e). D, dimer; M, monomer; F, free probe.